DiscussMormonism.com

Dr. Shades wrote:
And to clarify:

"Z trolls:" A person who posted my real name on the old Zion's Lighthouse Message Board repeatedly and obsessively, then when called out on it created multiple variations of my first and last name as new screen names. This person even posted my wife's real name at one or more points.

Which was the catalyst for my throwing in. I'll clarify my own previous post now. Bolding...

What was on Z...and now I am going to drive everyone reading this completely batshit because I won't identify the posters in question...was:

1. The mention of two posters names. Possibly three. (Myself and Shades)*
2. The use of a family member's name of a poster as a user name. (Shades wife)
3. The mention of a poster's minor child. (a poster who no longer posts here)

Where in my number 1, I say there were possibly three. There was the mention of another MDBer's first name but I cannot recall if it was on Z or the Itchy blog. That person also no longer posts here.

Also in number 1, a variation of my first name was used. There was also a phrase used in one post that could have only been acquired via first or second hand knowledge of my private messages.

Runtu wrote:I remember that. I think I’d rather have them call my employer than threaten my wife.

I recall that. Unbelievable, Runtu! These Mopologists apparently have no shame! I am very sorry that happened.

Kishkumen wrote:I recall that. Unbelievable, Runtu! These Mopologists apparently have no shame! I am very sorry that happened.

I’m assuming the mopologist was trying to harm your career, which is despicable. I also assume your professor thought he was a loon.

Runtu wrote:I’m assuming the mopologist was trying to harm your career, which is despicable. I also assume your professor thought he was a loon.

If it happened. It is consistent with the Mopolgetic M.O., but I never heard from anyone at my employment about it. Perhaps my BYU source was mistaken. This is one of the key differences between my situation and yours and your wife’s.

Heck they eat their own. I'm remembering David B.

I am a bit surprised at the lengths Smac goes to in order to protect himself against allegations of impropriety, however, I am very happy he left off this part:

"I always use a tissue or disposable gloves to touch my alleged member when going tinkle. I wish to avoid any allegations of undue stimulation."

http://www.mormondialogue.org/topic/70698-update-on-mckenna-denson-lawsuit-hearing-schedule/?page=21

moksha wrote:I am a bit surprised at the lengths Smac goes to in order to protect himself against allegations of impropriety, however, I am very happy he left off this part:

"I always use a tissue or disposable gloves to touch my alleged member when going tinkle. I wish to avoid any allegations of undue stimulation."

http://www.mormondialogue.org/topic/70698-update-on-mckenna-denson-lawsuit-hearing-schedule/?page=21

That’s the kind of thing one should probably not publish online.

Kishkumen wrote:Hell, someone at BYU told me that a Mopologist contacted my employer to get me in hot water. Don’t know whether this was true, but it certainly is consistent with the Mope M.O.!

After thrashing a Mormon with his stance and defense on Facebook, I got booted from Facebook. So it is typical of their paranoid behavior. They obviously cannot with with facts, reality, and logic, so they resort to attacks personally that affect you in various ways. Looking back on it, it was one of the best things to happen to me.

It’s religion and politics. People lack self control when it comes to arguing about religion and/or politics. They sometimes lash out!

moksha wrote:I am a bit surprised at the lengths Smac goes to in order to protect himself against allegations of impropriety, however, I am very happy he left off this part:

"I always use a tissue or disposable gloves to touch my alleged member when going tinkle. I wish to avoid any allegations of undue stimulation."

http://www.mormondialogue.org/topic/70698-update-on-mckenna-denson-lawsuit-hearing-schedule/?page=21

Are you referencing this specific post?

http://www.mormondialogue.org/topic/706 ... 1209836221

(Hope that link works!)

I read that post and thought, “Good grief! You take all those precautions, but then you think it’s just fine for a man to be alone behind closed doors with a child or youth and ask them questions about masturbation and sex?” How does that make sense?????