Protect LDS Children "The action" tomorrow

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: Protect LDS Children "The action" tomorrow

Post by _Jersey Girl »

Shulem wrote:
Jersey Girl wrote:Press conference is ongoing live as I write this. Sam Young being interviewed by multiple reporters. Currently giving an interview in Spanish. One reporter was possibly national, will try to find out.

Sam is on fire.


Watch it live on Facebook or view later.


This really is the beginning of a campaign to force the church to stop abusing children and expose the church for this horrific practice. Eventually it will get legal and government attention. The public needs to know that Mormons are obsessed with not masturbating and have messed with the tender minds of countless children. This is Karma, baby, and the church is going to be bitch slapped harder than it was over polygamy. The church is guilty and should pay a heavy price just like the Catholic church did.


I think that the current protest is one step forward in a process. by the way, the other night I looked for information regarding my former church, the SBC.

Here's how the SBC chose to address the issues and take note of the date of the article.

http://www.sbclife.net/article/1840/cri ... -and-grace
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: Protect LDS Children "The action" tomorrow

Post by _Jersey Girl »

Shulem wrote:I think the news media needs to track down the apostles wherever they may be or go. Dog them!

Paparazzi!


One of the reporters appeared to be national. I'm waiting for an answer on that.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: Protect LDS Children "The action" tomorrow

Post by _Jersey Girl »

An issue that was raised by last evening (?) was that should the LDS church eliminate one:one interviews with children, would that prevent children from reporting abuse.

I thought Sam's answer was spot on. He said that what should be happening is that adults who interact with children in positions of responsibility/authority (teachers, pastors, bishops, etc.) should be receiving bystander training. This would help adults identify signs of suspected child abuse and give them guidance on how to proceed.

I can't help but agree that this should be the case in all church settings because it's the only way to get close to meeting the needs of the children.

Sam has obviously done his homework. He's well able to articulate the issues and suggest workable solutions. Even if the church itself is not listening in, Sam's audience is listening and absorbing what he presents.

A grassroots fire cannot spread far or fast without strong wind. I'm now seeing Sam as propellant.

:-)
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_Shulem
_Emeritus
Posts: 12072
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 1:48 am

Re: Protect LDS Children "The action" tomorrow

Post by _Shulem »

Jersey Girl wrote:I think that the current protest is one step forward in a process. by the way, the other night I looked for information regarding my former church, the SBC.

Here's how the SBC chose to address the issues and take note of the date of the article.

http://www.sbclife.net/article/1840/cri ... -and-grace


LDS teaching positions are constantly changing hands and there are a great many people in positions that serve children throughout the church. The way the church operates they would have to perform background checks on pretty much every single member of the ward because everyone pretty much gets involved with children at some point or another. I would have to think there are some members who would object to getting a background check perhaps because they have a criminal record and don't want the embarrassment to resurface.

This is a real problem for the LDS church. They need to change their entire teaching structure and limit those who work with children. Gone are the days of having everyone teach. Yeah!
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: Protect LDS Children "The action" tomorrow

Post by _Jersey Girl »

Shulem wrote:
Jersey Girl wrote:I think that the current protest is one step forward in a process. by the way, the other night I looked for information regarding my former church, the SBC.

Here's how the SBC chose to address the issues and take note of the date of the article.

http://www.sbclife.net/article/1840/cri ... -and-grace


LDS teaching positions are constantly changing hands and there are a great many people in positions that serve children throughout the church. The way the church operates they would have to perform background checks on pretty much every single member of the ward because everyone pretty much gets involved with children at some point or another. I would have to think there are some members who would object to getting a background check perhaps because they have a criminal record and don't want the embarrassment to resurface.

This is a real problem for the LDS church. They need to change their entire teaching structure and limit those who work with children. Gone are the days of having everyone teach. Yeah!


FBI background check probably costs close to $50 by now.
State...I'm guessing $25.

Look at is as a bit of insurance.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_Shulem
_Emeritus
Posts: 12072
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 1:48 am

Re: Protect LDS Children "The action" tomorrow

Post by _Shulem »

Jersey Girl wrote:
FBI background check probably costs close to $50 by now.
State...I'm guessing $25.

Look at is as a bit of insurance.


The church is just going to have to foot the bill and get a program going where everyone is checked. Just imagine all the shaming and pointed fingers that will take place when members gossip about so and so not accepting or being worthy of a calling.

Instead of just wondering if that unworthy person masturbates members will be wondering if he's a felon or has some kind of devious thing on his record.

Oh my. It's time to bail out of the good ship Mormonism! Questionable members need to get out now or face humiliation and public embarrassment.
_Water Dog
_Emeritus
Posts: 1798
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 7:10 am

Re: Protect LDS Children "The action" tomorrow

Post by _Water Dog »

Jersey Girl wrote:FBI background check probably costs close to $50 by now.
State...I'm guessing $25.

Look at is as a bit of insurance.

Every year when my kids do sports and I signup to help with the team or coach they run a background check on me. Every. Year. Adults who have been cleared then get a special ID that they are supposed to wear. If you don't have the ID, you don't get to be in the dugout, etc.

The other thing about this that makes no sense is they could simply require members to pay for the cost of their own background checks. No questions asked, they would do it. The church could simply form a partnership with Intelius, or some company, and then setup a website that is tied to their LDS ORG account. Point, click, enter credit card number, background check is then done. It would be SOOOO easy. Wouldn't cost the church a penny, they might even turn a profit.
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: Protect LDS Children "The action" tomorrow

Post by _Jersey Girl »

Water Dog wrote:
Jersey Girl wrote:FBI background check probably costs close to $50 by now.
State...I'm guessing $25.

Look at is as a bit of insurance.

Every year when my kids do sports and I signup to help with the team or coach they run a background check on me. Every. Year. Adults who have been cleared then get a special ID that they are supposed to wear. If you don't have the ID, you don't get to be in the dugout, etc.

The other thing about this that makes no sense is they could simply require members to pay for the cost of their own background checks. No questions asked, they would do it. The church could simply form a partnership with Intelius, or some company, and then setup a website that is tied to their LDS ORG account. Point, click, enter credit card number, background check is then done. It would be SOOOO easy. Wouldn't cost the church a penny, they might even turn a profit.


I paid out of pocket for my own state and federal background checks. I see no reason why LDS church folks wouldn't do the same. If someone wanted to opt out, they simply wouldn't be permitted to take part in working with or transporting youth.

Done.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: Protect LDS Children "The action" tomorrow

Post by _Jersey Girl »

I asked about the issue of 2 petitions and received a response. Here's an excerpt of the conversation.

the one we started has the lower number, and someone else had started one that has the higher number. There is no other difference (members and non members can sign either or both).

We delivered copies of both to the Church at the March for the Children on March 30.

Ours: bit.ly/SafeKidsAndBishops

Theirs: https://www.care2.com/causes/lets-not-m ... lives.html


And yes, there could be some crossover signatures. I'm not sure if that matters except for those who would like to see more precise reporting which I think is understandable, still two petitions were delivered to the church for consideration.

And as I stated previously, when I signed there was no distinction made for members vs. non-members so I can vouch for what was stated above in terms of my own experience.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_RockSlider
_Emeritus
Posts: 6752
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 4:02 am

Re: Protect LDS Children "The action" tomorrow

Post by _RockSlider »

Jersey Girl,

Do you think Sam is getting the desired results at this point?
Post Reply