No Longer the "Mormon" Church - Deceptive Ads Instead

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_DrW
_Emeritus
Posts: 7222
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 2:57 am

Re: No Longer the "Mormon" Church - Deceptive Ads Instead

Post by _DrW »

Exiled wrote:It's amazing that even more people don't go elsewhere when their leaders act like this.

Strongly agree. It has to be disheartening for faithful members when the term Mormon has come to be held in such low regard by the general public that the leadership of the Church feels obliged to abandon it and re-brand.

It must be especially galling for the rank and file to realize that this sad state of affairs has come to pass because of the bigotry, callousness, and willful ignorance of its generally clueless and largely non-representative leadership.
David Hume: "---Mistakes in philosophy are merely ridiculous, those in religion are dangerous."

DrW: "Mistakes in science are learning opportunities and are eventually corrected."
_moksha
_Emeritus
Posts: 22508
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm

Re: No Longer the "Mormon" Church - Deceptive Ads Instead

Post by _moksha »

Because of many claims made about being the complete and restored church, it is not possible to simply advertise that we are the "New and Improved Mormon Church".

Renamings happen in the business world due to bad publicity, like when Arthur Anderson became Altria due to the Enron scandal, or when mercenary soldiers company Blackwater became Xe and then ACADEMI.

The fly in this renaming ointment is that our missionaries will still carry around the Book of Mormon.
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
_Gadianton
_Emeritus
Posts: 9947
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 5:12 am

Re: No Longer the "Mormon" Church - Deceptive Ads Instead

Post by _Gadianton »

Dr. W,

This is a similar tactic to EVs who define themselves as Christian— take a word that has an understandable broad application and then use it in a narrow, exclusive way. The hope is to define one’s way to victory.

I don’t think it works very well. I always found it was easier to just call ourselves Mormons on mission despite the recommendation to try to hide the fact as long as possible.

In the case they have heard of Mormonism it’s just confusing and if they were biased that comes out anyway, and if they haven’t, then it doesn’t really help because they don’t have the expectation that Jesus is everything. There was a lot of Christianity where I was at, and some of the most interested investigators were looking for something different, and not exactly “Christian”.

But by all means spend millions of dollars figuring this out the hard way.
Lou Midgley 08/20/2020: "...meat wad," and "cockroach" are pithy descriptions of human beings used by gemli? They were not fashioned by Professor Peterson.

LM 11/23/2018: one can explain away the soul of human beings...as...a Meat Unit, to use Professor Peterson's clever derogatory description of gemli's ideology.
_SuperDell
_Emeritus
Posts: 919
Joined: Fri May 01, 2015 12:27 am

Re: No Longer the "Mormon" Church - Deceptive Ads Instead

Post by _SuperDell »

Major league dishonesty - The Church of Jesus Christ is the legal name of a different Church - not L-d$,inc.

Would be nice to see the legal owner of the name hit the MoronicPriesthood types with a lawsuit and restraining order.
“Those who never retract their opinions love themselves more than they love truth.”
― Joseph Joubert
_JP
_Emeritus
Posts: 24
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2018 1:27 am

Re: No Longer the "Mormon" Church - Deceptive Ads Instead

Post by _JP »

DrW wrote:Strongly agree. It has to be disheartening for faithful members when the term Mormon has come to be held in such low regard by the general public that the leadership of the Church feels obliged to abandon it and re-brand.

It must be especially galling for the rank and file to realize that this sad state of affairs has come to pass because of the bigotry, callousness, and willful ignorance of its generally clueless and largely non-representative leadership.


I'm quite confident that the "faithful" and "rank and file" members of the church are just fine with the recent shift away from the term "Mormon." You've constructed a narrative here that 95% of church members simply don't identify with.

I know many folks here are convinced this approach won't work, and the church will be back to using "Mormon" in the near future, but I'm not so convinced. I believe the church believes it has enough marketing and SEO power, combined with the fact that "The Church of Jesus Christ" is so fractured and not truly owned by one entity, that it believes it can co-opt the term.

And I think they're probably right, and if they are, it's actually a pretty genius move (and on brand).
_DrW
_Emeritus
Posts: 7222
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 2:57 am

Re: No Longer the "Mormon" Church - Deceptive Ads Instead

Post by _DrW »

JP wrote:
DrW wrote:Strongly agree. It has to be disheartening for faithful members when the term Mormon has come to be held in such low regard by the general public that the leadership of the Church feels obliged to abandon it and re-brand.

It must be especially galling for the rank and file to realize that this sad state of affairs has come to pass because of the bigotry, callousness, and willful ignorance of its generally clueless and largely non-representative leadership.


I'm quite confident that the "faithful" and "rank and file" members of the church are just fine with the recent shift away from the term "Mormon." You've constructed a narrative here that 95% of church members simply don't identify with.

I know many folks here are convinced this approach won't work, and the church will be back to using "Mormon" in the near future, but I'm not so convinced. I believe the church believes it has enough marketing and SEO power, combined with the fact that "The Church of Jesus Christ" is so fractured and not truly owned by one entity, that it believes it can co-opt the term.

And I think they're probably right, and if they are, it's actually a pretty genius move (and on brand).

Nice gambit. But you seem to be missing the point.

My comments here reflect the view of most of the Mormons with whom I have spoken regarding the honesty and effectiveness (and the lack thereof) when it comes to current LDS Leadership.

Well over half the Mormons I have known for more than 10 years or so, in any capacity, have left the LDS Church - many in openly expressed disgust. That includes my parents, all but one (BIC) sibling, the vast majority of nieces and nephews, and many members of my wife's current Ward, including some formerly prominent members.

You indicate that you are proud of the LDS Church leadership for trying to shed a centuries old brand that has fallen into disrepute through their own collective misguidence and mismanagement, and unethically attempting to co-opt the brand of another church just because the LD$ have the internet presence to do so.

Is that about right?

Why are we here not surprised.
David Hume: "---Mistakes in philosophy are merely ridiculous, those in religion are dangerous."

DrW: "Mistakes in science are learning opportunities and are eventually corrected."
_Fence Sitter
_Emeritus
Posts: 8862
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 3:49 pm

Re: No Longer the "Mormon" Church - Deceptive Ads Instead

Post by _Fence Sitter »

JP wrote:[ You've constructed a narrative here that 95% of church members simply don't identify with.
(and on brand).


Since over 50% of Mormons are inactive, how can it be asserted that 95% of Mormons don't identify with something?
"Any over-ritualized religion since the dawn of time can make its priests say yes, we know, it is rotten, and hard luck, but just do as we say, keep at the ritual, stick it out, give us your money and you'll end up with the angels in heaven for evermore."
_I have a question
_Emeritus
Posts: 9749
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2015 8:01 am

Re: No Longer the "Mormon" Church - Deceptive Ads Instead

Post by _I have a question »

JP wrote:I'm quite confident that the "faithful" and "rank and file" members of the church are just fine with the recent shift away from the term "Mormon."


Just as those same members were just fine with supporting the "I'm a Mormon" and "meet The Mormons" campaigns - both significant victories for Satan.

Why are rank and file members unable to spot when Church leaders are handing victories to Satan and speak up about it at the time?
Last edited by Guest on Wed Jan 16, 2019 2:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
“When we are confronted with evidence that challenges our deeply held beliefs we are more likely to reframe the evidence than we are to alter our beliefs. We simply invent new reasons, new justifications, new explanations. Sometimes we ignore the evidence altogether.” (Mathew Syed 'Black Box Thinking')
_Craig Paxton
_Emeritus
Posts: 2389
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2012 8:28 pm

Re: No Longer the "Mormon" Church - Deceptive Ads Instead

Post by _Craig Paxton »

Add Mormon to the list of other brands that have changed their name...some more successfully than others

Quantum Computer Services » AOL. ...
BackRub » Google. ...
Sound of Music » Best Buy. ...
Apple Computers » Apple, Inc. ...
Research in Motion » Blackberry. ...
Brad's Drink » Pepsi-Cola. ...
Tokyo Tsushin Kogyo » Sony.
"...The official doctrine of the LDS Church is a Global Flood" - BCSpace

"...What many people call sin is not sin." - Joseph Smith

"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away" - Phillip K. Dick

“The meaning of life is that it ends" - Franz Kafka
_JP
_Emeritus
Posts: 24
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2018 1:27 am

Re: No Longer the "Mormon" Church - Deceptive Ads Instead

Post by _JP »

DrW wrote:You indicate that you are proud of the LDS Church leadership for trying to shed a centuries old brand


Do I? Where exactly do I do that?
Post Reply