Maksutov wrote:...we do know that the Book of Mormon is of human origin...
And others would disagree.
Regards,
MG
Maksutov wrote:...we do know that the Book of Mormon is of human origin...
mentalgymnast wrote:Maksutov wrote:...we do know that the Book of Mormon is of human origin...
And others would disagree.
Regards,
MG
Themis wrote: I'm criticizing you for speculating based on 0 evidence and worse for a lot of evidence that does not support your speculations.
I will again say, as I've said before, in the market place of ideas and religions I look at the CofJCofLDS as a very strong competitor in that marketplace as being the 'real deal' in all of its fullness.
Gadianton wrote:...the information must be soldered in from elsewhere.
mentalgymnast wrote:
I think we've been down this road before, Themis. I suppose the problem with being able to focus on and really determine whether one faith community might have something more...of an eternal nature/importance...than another is the fact that there are so many of them. It makes it a bit confusing, doesn't it? You look at all of the systems of faith that generally/essentially have similar teachings and have a set of doctrines or practices that people adhere to and one can easily say, "Well, they can't all be true, so none of them are". Or the corollary, "Well, I've determined that there is no evidence for God, so all the systems of religious belief are man made".
I will again say, as I've said before, in the market place of ideas and religions I look at the CofJCofLDS as a very strong competitor in that marketplace as being the 'real deal' in all of its fullness. I know that this can't be proved to you. It's a matter of faith. But for you to determine that the CofJCofLDS doesn't have one piece of evidence that would lead one towards a belief in its divine origins is honestly a bit egotistical in your own prowess in having learned all there is to know about life and the cosmos.
Have you stopped wondering about human potential beyond the here and now? Have you stopped asking yourself the question, "Is there something more than this?"
Religious folks, and members of the LDS church in particular are like Joseph Smith, the founder prophet, in the sense that they are concerned for the state and welfare of their eternal soul and whether or not they are accountable to God.
honorentheos wrote:Gadianton wrote:...the information must be soldered in from elsewhere.
Sorry to derail slightly, but for whatever reason I really enjoyed this phrasing and wanted to acknowledge that to Gad.
Lemmie wrote:I will again say, as I've said before, in the market place of ideas and religions I look at the CofJCofLDS as a very strong competitor in that marketplace as being the 'real deal' in all of its fullness.
Why?
Themis wrote: I keep an open mind.
Lemmie wrote:I will again say, as I've said before, in the market place of ideas and religions I look at the CofJCofLDS as a very strong competitor in that marketplace as being the 'real deal' in all of its fullness.
Why?
mentalgymnast wrote:Nothing you haven't heard before. I think I know that for a fact. I don't know that it's worth the time of 'making a list'. You could probably make it for me.![]()
But, I have been down the path of comparison shopping. I don't see any product that outperforms the message and doctrines of the CofJCofLDS.
Not to say, however, that there aren't a whole lot of other products on the shelves that provide a lot of good and nourishment to the common good and well being of humanity.
Regards,
MG
Lemmie wrote:I will again say, as I've said before, in the market place of ideas and religions I look at the CofJCofLDS as a very strong competitor in that marketplace as being the 'real deal' in all of its fullness.
Why?