She was obviously lying

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Dr Exiled
_Emeritus
Posts: 3616
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 3:48 am

Re: She was obviously lying

Post by _Dr Exiled »

Come on Peacemaker, you know deep down that Mormonism is indefensible. That's why you are here bearing your testimony. Do you feel better after condemning us?

Seer stones? Disappearing plates? Right out of the gate it's highly questionable and it only gets worse from there. You know, it's better dealing with reality instead of false paradigms. Why don't you use Alma 32 reasoning and try our reality based lifestyle? I think you'll find it's better and you'll save some money to boot.
"Religion is about providing human community in the guise of solving problems that don’t exist or failing to solve problems that do and seeking to reconcile these contradictions and conceal the failures in bogus explanations otherwise known as theology." - Kishkumen 
_Gadianton
_Emeritus
Posts: 9947
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 5:12 am

Re: She was obviously lying

Post by _Gadianton »

Exiled wrote:Come on Peacemaker, you know deep down that Mormonism is indefensible. That's why you are here bearing your testimony. Do you feel better after condemning us?

Seer stones? Disappearing plates? Right out of the gate it's highly questionable and it only gets worse from there. You know, it's better dealing with reality instead of false paradigms. Why don't you use Alma 32 reasoning and try our reality based lifestyle? I think you'll find it's better and you'll save some money to boot.


well said, Exiled. I sensed the same thing, that this individual suspects it's all a sham and just can't ditch the ego.
Lou Midgley 08/20/2020: "...meat wad," and "cockroach" are pithy descriptions of human beings used by gemli? They were not fashioned by Professor Peterson.

LM 11/23/2018: one can explain away the soul of human beings...as...a Meat Unit, to use Professor Peterson's clever derogatory description of gemli's ideology.
_lostindc
_Emeritus
Posts: 2380
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 11:27 pm

Re: She was obviously lying

Post by _lostindc »

Gadianton wrote:
Exiled wrote:Come on Peacemaker, you know deep down that Mormonism is indefensible. That's why you are here bearing your testimony. Do you feel better after condemning us?

Seer stones? Disappearing plates? Right out of the gate it's highly questionable and it only gets worse from there. You know, it's better dealing with reality instead of false paradigms. Why don't you use Alma 32 reasoning and try our reality based lifestyle? I think you'll find it's better and you'll save some money to boot.


well said, Exiled. I sensed the same thing, that this individual suspects it's all a sham and just can't ditch the ego.


I was once a Peacemaker, well not in the definition of the word, but like the Peacemaker poster. I wasn't a potato like this Peacemaker, but I was very much troubled similar to Peacemaker. I would jump on this board, or similar boards, once I discovered an aha, bullseye, or whatever. My hope was validation of Mormonism even though I knew Mormonism to be an obvious fraud. Crazy. I feel bad for Peacemaker and I hope he gets unstuck from this realm.
2019 = #100,000missionariesstrong
_I have a question
_Emeritus
Posts: 9749
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2015 8:01 am

Re: She was obviously lying

Post by _I have a question »

peacemaker wrote:You anti-Mormons didn't listen to me. A woman that contradicts herself and has a history of making false accusations is lying. You anti-mormons didn't believe brother Leavitt when he stated that Denson did not use the words rape or attempted rape. You anti-mormons are blind and worship false prophets.
If she was called Joseph Smith you'd still find a way of believing her.
“When we are confronted with evidence that challenges our deeply held beliefs we are more likely to reframe the evidence than we are to alter our beliefs. We simply invent new reasons, new justifications, new explanations. Sometimes we ignore the evidence altogether.” (Mathew Syed 'Black Box Thinking')
_SuperDell
_Emeritus
Posts: 919
Joined: Fri May 01, 2015 12:27 am

Re: She was obviously lying

Post by _SuperDell »

peacemaker wrote:You anti-Mormons didn't listen to me. A woman that contradicts herself and has a history of making false accusations is lying. You anti-mormons didn't believe brother Leavitt when he stated that Denson did not use the words rape or attempted rape. You anti-mormons are blind and worship false prophets.


Nope, don't believe in prophets, false or not.

I think they are less real than Vampires.
“Those who never retract their opinions love themselves more than they love truth.”
― Joseph Joubert
_Fence Sitter
_Emeritus
Posts: 8862
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 3:49 pm

Re: She was obviously lying

Post by _Fence Sitter »

I'll apologize for Denson if you will apologize for Hamalu.
"Any over-ritualized religion since the dawn of time can make its priests say yes, we know, it is rotten, and hard luck, but just do as we say, keep at the ritual, stick it out, give us your money and you'll end up with the angels in heaven for evermore."
Post Reply