The hell of Mormon afterlife

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_mentalgymnast
_Emeritus
Posts: 8574
Joined: Sat Jun 01, 2013 9:39 pm

Re: The hell of Mormon afterlife

Post by _mentalgymnast »

Morley wrote: For instance, you could explain how, in the LDS Church, obedience and morality are different. Or why they’re the same thing.


Is obedience to the commandments/teachings of the church and/or the Gospel of Jesus Christ immoral? For example, if I choose to honor my father and my mother...is that a moral act or is it simply blind obedience? Are there shades of gray? Should we act according to our moral conscience as we walk the path of obedience to commandments? If obeying a particular commandment goes against the grain of our own sense of morality are we obligated to obey?

There is obviously a LOT that can be unpacked in regards to your question.

9/11 terrorists. Moral because they were being obedient?

You ask a question that would take reams of dialogue to discuss before coming to any compromise or resolution.

In regards to the church and the daily living of the gospel, yes, I think that...generally speaking...walking the path of obedience to the commandments and guidelines of the church shows moral stamina and character. Are there going to be some hiccups along the way such as Prop. 8 sorts of speed bumps where both the church and its members have to find common ground if possible? Sure. Are there going to be times when common ground cannot be found between some members and the leadership? Sure. So can it get messy for some and not for others in what they see as moral correctness vs. not? Sure.

Back to the OP. Stem was making the argument that any placement or reward in the afterlife is a result of a set of arbitrary rules that may not have a grounding in what he considers to be correct moral practice, etc. At least that's what I got out of what he said. My argument is that the commandments of God are not a bunch of arbitrary rules and/or commandments that have little or nothing to do with correct moral principles but in fact are based upon eternal verities and moral guidelines and practices that can bring us to a state of godliness.

For example, charity. If charity...which includes the pure love of Christ and desire to become like Him...rules our hearts, is that not going to lead us in paths of moral clarity when it comes to making correct choices and controlling/disciplining our thoughts? I think so.

Anyway, I'm sure you will find reason to find exceptions and or reasons to find it abhorrent and/or unreasonable to find/look at the commandments of God to be contrary to moral correctness/practice. Be that as it may, isn't it wonderful that we each have the freedom to choose that which we believe to be correct moral practice/behavior?

And opposition provides those opportunities to make these choices.

Regards,
MG
_mentalgymnast
_Emeritus
Posts: 8574
Joined: Sat Jun 01, 2013 9:39 pm

Re: The hell of Mormon afterlife

Post by _mentalgymnast »

Morley wrote:
You need to careful, Dean Robbers. MG does not like to be held to the things he actually says.


Au contrair, mon ami, I'm open to correction and or adjustment in what I say. That's how we learn, right?

Granted, I'm not wrong very often. :wink: :smile:

Regards,
MG
_Lemmie
_Emeritus
Posts: 10590
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2015 7:25 pm

Re: The hell of Mormon afterlife

Post by _Lemmie »

Maksutov wrote:
mentalgymnast wrote:That's just bullsh**.

Things...and perceptions...really change when you jump off the boat, don't they?

Regards,
MG


That's the idea. Freedom from the bullsh** of Mormonism. :lol:

fetchface:

Is that guy still responding to me? What a waste of keystrokes. I have him on ignore.

And what a perfect example of why. He takes my statement out of context and expresses his faux outrage at it, but the truth is I'm right. The leaders of the LDS church don't want members going around calling them on their hypocrisy like Jesus called his leaders out. LDS church leaders don't want members to behave like Jesus and analyze their behavior critically. They want obedient sheep who never criticize them.

He knows I'm right so he has to quote me with context removed and rage at me, but he knows I'm right.

“Obedient” and “never criticizing.” That’s exactly the expectation, sadly. It twists the ordinary member’s responses into inconsistencies that I really think an individual would not engage in, without this added expectation.
_Gadianton
_Emeritus
Posts: 9947
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 5:12 am

Re: The hell of Mormon afterlife

Post by _Gadianton »

that the commandments of God are not a bunch of arbitrary rules and/or commandments that have little or nothing to do with correct moral principles but in fact are based upon eternal verities and moral guidelines and practices that can bring us to a state of godliness.


So Abraham nearly killing Isaac brought Abraham closer to a state of godliness?
Lou Midgley 08/20/2020: "...meat wad," and "cockroach" are pithy descriptions of human beings used by gemli? They were not fashioned by Professor Peterson.

LM 11/23/2018: one can explain away the soul of human beings...as...a Meat Unit, to use Professor Peterson's clever derogatory description of gemli's ideology.
_fetchface
_Emeritus
Posts: 1526
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2014 5:38 pm

Re: The hell of Mormon afterlife

Post by _fetchface »

Gadianton wrote:
that the commandments of God are not a bunch of arbitrary rules and/or commandments that have little or nothing to do with correct moral principles but in fact are based upon eternal verities and moral guidelines and practices that can bring us to a state of godliness.


So Abraham nearly killing Isaac brought Abraham closer to a state of godliness?

Not to mention when the Israelites that had to completely wipe out the Canaanites, including the babes. Slitting those newborn throats brought them closer to godliness? Seems logical.
Ubi Dubium Ibi Libertas
My Blog: http://untanglingmybrain.blogspot.com/
_Philo Sofee
_Emeritus
Posts: 6660
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 9:04 am

Re: The hell of Mormon afterlife

Post by _Philo Sofee »

Fetchface
Not to mention when the Israelites that had to completely wipe out the Canaanites, including the babes. Slitting those newborn throats brought them closer to godliness? Seems logical.


Well that helped, but when they continued obeying the Lord, because, well..... whatever God wants just has to be right, right? When they continued to also slaughter all the innocent animals for their crime of being in the wrong place at the wrong time, and......and.....when they salted the earth and killed all of those wicked plants for the crime of.....well.......being in the wrong place at the wrong time.....that.....that was the celestial moment when even the choirs of angels sang out for praise and joy and ululation.
Dr CamNC4Me
"Dr. Peterson and his Callithumpian cabal of BYU idiots have been marginalized by their own inevitable irrelevancy defending a fraud."
_fetchface
_Emeritus
Posts: 1526
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2014 5:38 pm

Re: The hell of Mormon afterlife

Post by _fetchface »

At some point you just have to stop and consider the possibility that you are working for the wrong side.
Ubi Dubium Ibi Libertas
My Blog: http://untanglingmybrain.blogspot.com/
_Morley
_Emeritus
Posts: 3542
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 6:19 pm

Re: The hell of Mormon afterlife

Post by _Morley »

mentalgymnast wrote:
Morley wrote: For instance, you could explain how, in the LDS Church, obedience and morality are different. Or why they’re the same thing.


Is obedience to the commandments/teachings of the church and/or the Gospel of Jesus Christ immoral?


In response to this same question from MG earlier in the thread, Morley wrote:And, no, obedience is not immoral. Neither is it moral. It's just obedience and should not be confused with morality. That's the point.


mentalgymnast wrote:My argument is that the commandments of God are not a bunch of arbitrary rules and/or commandments that have little or nothing to do with correct moral principles but in fact are based upon eternal verities and moral guidelines and practices that can bring us to a state of godliness.


What 'correct moral principle' is met by the LDS Church's version of baptism by immersion?
_mentalgymnast
_Emeritus
Posts: 8574
Joined: Sat Jun 01, 2013 9:39 pm

Re: The hell of Mormon afterlife

Post by _mentalgymnast »

Gadianton wrote:
that the commandments of God are not a bunch of arbitrary rules and/or commandments that have little or nothing to do with correct moral principles but in fact are based upon eternal verities and moral guidelines and practices that can bring us to a state of godliness.


So Abraham nearly killing Isaac brought Abraham closer to a state of godliness?


Two questions:

Did God love Abraham perfectly?
Did God love Isaac perfectly?

Of course we already can surmise that Abraham loved his son.

Regards,
MG
_Morley
_Emeritus
Posts: 3542
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 6:19 pm

Re: The hell of Mormon afterlife

Post by _Morley »

mentalgymnast wrote:
Gadianton wrote:So Abraham nearly killing Isaac brought Abraham closer to a state of godliness?


Two questions:

Did God love Abraham perfectly?
Did God love Isaac perfectly?

Of course we already can surmise that Abraham loved his son.



You didn't answer his question.



edit: Nor mine, for that matter.
Post Reply