Kiwi57 uses words

[_Lemmie]

I can see this new thread turning into a kiwi57 comments Hall of Infamy. There’s just SO. MUCH. CONTENT. It’s too bad disqus doesn’t have a better search feature. It’d be interesting to review Russell “I use the hard R” McGregor’s thoughts on hot button topics.

- Doc

There really is, right? I wasn’t that aware of this guy until a while back when I noticed someone commenting over and over about “grunting” and “oinking” in the comments on Peterson’s Blog. What a bizarre approach to take! But, yes, that turned out to be this kiwi dude. He really had a thing for “oinks“ and “grunts,” to use his own terminology. Hopefully, his obsession has subsided. Replacing it with the racist bigotry in the OP is NOT an improvement, however.

[_Dr Moore]

Dan is correct to decry claims of moral equivalency on his message board and MDB. Russell and Midgley with their racism, open contempt and stalking tilt the scale, SeN wins the more offensive board competition. Equating the N word with “Mopologist” - just wow. I guess anything those two write will he left up with benefit of the doubt and in the name of friendship, no matter how objectively offensive.

[_Gadianton]

Last I checked, the comment hadn't been upvoted yet. Why not upvoted it, Coach? Whose side are you on?

[_Lemmie]

Kiwi57 Dr. Shades • 16 hours ago

It's a term of abuse used as a dog-whistle by a certain kind of bigot. Some bigots use "kike," others use "nigg*r," still others use "spic," and yet others use "mopologist."

http://disq.us/p/29lq1vz

After McGregor’s comment using the N word, Peterson says the following when asked about bigots on his site:

DanielPeterson Mod Dr. Shades • 5 hours ago • edited

There are none of them here, though, so far as I can tell.

http://disq.us/p/29mdrym

That’s shameful. McGregor uses the N word on Peterson’s site to cast aspersions on people who use the term mopologist, but Peterson sees no bigotry.

[_Dr Moore]

bigot: (noun) a person who is intolerant toward those holding different opinions.

Source- https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/bigot

Kiwi57’s board history showcases the very definition of bigotry.

[_Dr Exiled]

This is such nonsense to equate those who don't agree with LDS claims to be bigots. Please calm down kiwi57. The bigot thing is played and it failed.

[_Jersey Girl]

Yeah Russ?

Kiwi57 Dr. Shades • 16 hours ago

It's a term of abuse used as a dog-whistle by a certain kind of bigot.

You mean like 'anti-Mormon"? Like that?

In any case...

big·Old Testament
/ˈbiɡət/
Learn to pronounce
noun
a person who is intolerant toward those holding different opinions.

Some bigots use "kike," others use "nigg*r," still others use "spic," and yet others use "mopologist."

http://disq.us/p/29lq1vz

No Rusty, those aren't bigots. Those are racists.

You're welcome.

[_I have a question]

Kiwi57 Dr. Shades • 16 hours ago

It's a term of abuse used as a dog-whistle by a certain kind of bigot. Some bigots use "kike," others use "nigg*r," still others use "spic," and yet others use "mopologist."

http://disq.us/p/29lq1vz

I don’t even know what to say. This is an inexcusable post by Russell McGregor. That Peterson leaves it up is even more inexcusable.

This from a man (amongst others within his cohort) that derogatorily refers to this board as a "trailer park". Is he suggesting that families who, because of their circumstances, live on trailer parks are not worthy of respect? They are to be considered a kind of scum class? To be thought less of simply because of where they live and how much money they have?

Perhaps he should be cleaning his own nest up, before pointing out perceived deficiencies in others.

[_Dr LOD]

The latest from KiwiFruit. Where he reaffirms his low "Fowler's Stages of Faith" level, with his concrete and black white thinking. As well as reaffirming his commitment to institutionalized racism.

KiwiFruit - Matt, one of the principles of civil dialogue is that each of us allows the other to speak for themselves. You might like to try it sometime.
Of course, if your position is so weak that you need to control both sides of the conversation in order to get any traction, then I guess you'll just do what you have to do.

MF- Don't you mean the church marginalizes people by race

That is entirely foreign to my experience.

MF- The church and doctrine contribute to marginalizing many.

That's false.

Those who refuse to repent may choose to feel "marginalized" in the Church. But that will always be their choice.

KiwiFruit is a uneducated version of Midgley. Not that Midgley is that impressive in the first place.

On the question of church doctrine marginalizing many. So as a six year old child I felt marginalized when in primary when the Lamanite Book of Mormon stories came up. Before baptism exactly what sins would I have the need to repent of at that time. And if I felt marginalized how exactly was it my choice.

[_Dr LOD]

I just ran across this gem of a Kiwi Turd.

This was in answer to Moshka posting something from another board talking about steps the church could addressing racism within the church.


https://disqus.com/home/discussion/danp ... il_to_god/

IMHO, all four of them would be most agreeable to those who think it's up to them to steady the ark of God.

I have no problem if the Lord's anointed servants decide to talk about those things, or any of them. Telling the brethren what they ought to be doing is not something non-apostates do all that often.

My impression of Mopologists is they went way beyond steadying the ark. They took it for themselves.