John Gee FAIR interview with Scott Gordon

[Shulem]

John Gee acting like a victim and not seeming to understand why critics are so damn mad at him. Are you really that stupid, John? No, I don't think so. Pull your head out of your ass and admit that historical claims of Egypt's making in Abraham chapter 1 is crap. That is NOT how Egypt came to be. Egypt is much older than that and far predates anything Joseph Smith understood about ancient Egypt and the Hebrews. The Facsimiles and the translations are one part of the problem. The introduction of Egypt as a nation state as describes in the Book of Abraham is absolutely false and is the MAIN problem. You know it, so just admit it you son of a bitch dirt worm! Quit acting like a victim when it's you that are making victims by supporting false-Egyptology in the Book of Abraham.

Abraham said she was his sister. You say the Book of Abraham is true. You're both liars, you and Abraham.

[Philo Sofee]

The video is available online now: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7f0s53lTfY&t=20s

Thanks. Within the first 2 minutes, he is asked why on the internet is John Gee accused so much of not being a good scholar, and he says it is a general accusation with no details.....NO DETAILS?!?!?!?
OH MY FRICKIN GAWD MAN!

[Shulem]

The historical information contained in the Book of Abraham is for fasting and prayer -- empty calories. Hungry for the real meat on how Egypt came to be? Joseph Smith's fairy tale is the furthest thing from the truth and leaves one hungry to know the real scoop. That's what you get with Johnny-boy Gee and his furry lapdog poodle-Muhlestein. You starve to learn the truth about ancient Egypt!

You want real Egyptology? You want the real MEAT of the matter? Upper and Lower Egypt coming together!

Unification, baby.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

ENJOY!





Take that, John Gee, you WORM!

[Shulem]

Scott Gordon is a very nice guy, but he fails to understand that, once the introduction is made, it is time to quickly move on to substantive issues. An open-ended interview can be very refreshing and informative, and Gee is capable of handling the hard questions.

Gee is capable of handling the hard questions?

[Alphus and Omegus]

Scott Gordon is a very nice guy, but he fails to understand that, once the introduction is made, it is time to quickly move on to substantive issues. An open-ended interview can be very refreshing and informative, and Gee is capable of handling the hard questions.

Gee is capable of handling the hard questions?

Talk about no self-awareness. Gee and the FAIR people cannot handle hard questions. They shrink in cowardice from debate. Instead, they want to build elaborate structures of delusion to shelter their arguments from the bracing air of reality.

I also found it hilarious that Gee claims critics don't focus on the content of the Book of Abraham. That is its weakest point. The history is based on fictitious young earth creationism. The theology is totally manufactured (Mahmackrah, Korash, Elkenah, Libnah, ). The chronology is totally wrong. The entire thing is obvious Bible fan-fiction.

[Shulem]

Radio Free Mormon just referred to Kerry Muhlestein as John Gee's "flying monkey" but then moments later apologized for being so rude and opted to rephrase his statement by calling Muhlestein a "crummy little toadie"!



Muhlestein the toadie!