Your next on Backyard Professor Live Shulem!!!

[Philo Sofee]

OK young man... I am going to be blitzoiding through all your materials this week like a rampaging bull so I can do a generalized overall of all your views, evidences and approach to the BofAbr for my next Sunday live! It was good to see you in the audience tonight. I showed some good stuff on astronomy I am thinking... what a great topic eh?

THANKS for all you do, you are going to get enormous credit for it - far too looooong in coming out, but better late than never!

[Shulem]

ALL that sounds great. I think we are getting much closer to the point when the Church is going to stop publishing the Facsimiles and caption the Book of Abraham as an inspired restoration of the life and story of Abraham rather than a direct translation from physical papyrus. The writing is on the wall and time is running out for the Church. But this is not going to make the problems go away. It will only divert the narrative and provide means where the the Church can just avoid the whole thing altogether and refuse to answer and own up.

The chiseling of Anubis's nose has yet to be addressed by apologists! They have avoided it for obvious reasons. Everyone knows it's Anubis. The apologists are going to have to come up with ideas of why the snout was removed from the lead plate. But the reasons are obvious (it was a coverup) and I've explained it in a manner that makes total sense. There is more to this story and Hedlock was not exactly happy about having remove the nose. I believe I know more about this because I've made it my business to find out. All in good time I will share more. I've got aces up my sleeve, BABY! Yeah! Reuben Hedlock should not be blamed for anything. He was following orders and doing what he was commissioned to do. It was all Smith's fault.

[Moksha]

The chiseling of Anubis's nose has yet to be addressed by apologists! They have avoided it for obvious reasons. Everyone knows it's Anubis. The apologists are going to have to come up with ideas of why the snout was removed from the lead plate.

Big thanks go out to Shulem for sniffing this out and pointing everyone in the right direction. The desecration of Anubis's snout needs to be recognized. Even though the LDS Church has a long-standing policy of never apologizing for its wrongdoing, this matter still needs to be taken before the ancient history tribunal.

[Philo Sofee]

Well they do say the nose Knows...

[Shulem]

Well they do say the nose Knows...

And everyone (and that includes you) knows that the nose was hacked out of the lead face of the jackal god. Who will deny it? Will the apologists deny it? NO, they will not! John Gee and Kerry Muhlestein are not going to deny it, not ever. They can't because they know that nobody will believe them including themselves. Sometimes it just gets a little too hard to lie to oneself when you know that lying is not going to work or solve the problem. That is where we have come with Anubis's nose on the lead plate. Everyone can look and see and come to an understanding that indeed the nose was scraped out. But not only that, so also was the headcloth rounded off, and his head contorted to look like a dumb pin-head guy.

Times are changing. We have all the high cards and everything in order by suit. We win, Kerry, we win! Nobody can stop us now. We are on a roll, yeah, baby! We are rolling over the apologists and busting their corrupt organization wide open and exposing it to the world.

See the face of Anubis, the jackal-god of ancient Egypt! Isn't that right John Gee? You know it, I know it, and God knows it. The person of Fig. 6 *is* mighty Anubis a god of ancient Egypt.

We cannot deny it. Nobody can!

[Shulem]

What might Royal Skousen have to say about the face of Anubis being mutilated in the lead plate after the fact that it was correctly carved in the first place? What would Brian Hauglid have to say about a human head with a jackal eyeball and canine ear atop his head? I think it reasonable to assume that all of the scholars and apologists of the LDS church have cringed at Facsimile No. 3 knowing full well that the Explanations don't match up with what's going on and that the little black guy at the end of the line got a bad rap from Joseph Smith.

But it's not Reuben Hedlock's fault. Don't blame him. He was following orders and trusted in the prophet. The blame lies squarely at the feet of the prophet Joseph Smith. He is the one that decided they must get rid of Free Masonry's Egyptian Dog-Star god and change his appearance in order to satisfy previous declarations that the black man was a slave in Egypt owned by servants of the king.

But the cat DOG is out of the bag, baby, YEAH BABY, Anubis is out of the bag and now everyone knows it's him. His snout was hacked off and his head was rounded. His headcloth was smoothed out and poor Anubis was purposely made to appear as the lowest man in authority and power in in vignette scene. He was likened to an African slave or the seed of Cain.

Yeah, BABY! Now you know!!

Thanks to Shulem and my revelations.

[Shulem]

• We don't have all the papyrus

• The Abrahamic portion on the roll was at the end and is lost

• There are hidden messages in Egyptian nobody today understands

• The hieroglyphs on the Facsimiles are not entirely legible

• Reuben Hedlock was not told to copy exactly what was on the papyrus

• The translation was a spiritual translation not necessarily literal

• Critics need to learn about current scholarship

[Moksha]

• We don't have all the papyrus

• The Abrahamic portion on the roll was at the end and is lost

• There are hidden messages in Egyptian nobody today understands

• The hieroglyphs on the Facsimiles are not entirely legible

• Reuben Hedlock was not told to copy exactly what was on the papyrus

• The translation was a spiritual translation not necessarily literal

• Critics need to learn about current scholarship

• This was written as fan-fiction and thus is not bound by rulings of the Ancient History Tribunal.

[Shulem]

Pearl of Great Price Central, as do other Book of Abraham apologists, make a big deal out of Joseph Smith's lucky guess for Fig. 6 of Facsimile No. 2. I mean come on man, it's a no brainer for a 19th century religionist to associate a common Bible theme of the four winds of heaven or the cardinal directions with four ancient Egyptian images huddled together within the register of the Hypocephalus. There are obvious astronomical symbolic connotations in and around the Hypocephalus itself, so surely the four cardinal directions must be therein! It's a no brainer! Duh! Smith got lucky by taking a common Bible theme and tossing it into his Facsimile explanations. But, with that said, he only nailed one element and FAILED to include the remaining elements which are more important than cardinal directions.

• PROPER NAMES! Hapi, Imsety, Duamutef, and Qebehsenuef

• The figures are Egyptian gods

• The figures are symbolic of Canopic jars used to store embalmed vital organs

Nonetheless, get a load of these statements made by apologists to provide a half baked explanation in order to bolster Smith's lucky hit. But it turns out that Smith's lucky hit provides little support in showing he understood the true nature of the Hypocephalus and what it represented. The apologists lose!

The Four Sons of Horus (Facsimile 2, Figure 6)

Figure 6 of Facsimile 2 of the Book of Abraham was interpreted straightforwardly by Joseph Smith as “represent[ing] this earth in its four quarters.” Based on contemporary nineteenth-century usage of this biblical idiom (Revelation 20:8), Joseph Smith evidently meant the figures represent the four cardinal points (north, east, south, and west). This interpretation finds ready support from the ancient Egyptians.

While Joseph Smith’s succinct interpretation of Figure 6 in Facsimile 2 might have left out some additional details we know about the Sons of Horus (roles which evolved over the span of Egyptian religious history), it nevertheless converges nicely with current Egyptological knowledge

[Moksha]

I was just thinking of Bill Reel's phrase, "institutionalized systemic deceit".

Could anyone use that in a sentence? What about a sentence in an upcoming podcast?

Could anyone make such a sentence using these words as well:

• Elkenah

• Libnah

• Mahmackrah

• Korash

------------
"Enish-go-on-Dosh, Mahmackrah?"
"Aye, and a top o' the morning to ye, Paddy!"