How long/intensely did you believe in the historicity of the Book of Mormon?

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
MG 2.0
God
Posts: 3657
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm

Re: How long/intensely did you believe in the historicity of the Book of Mormon?

Post by MG 2.0 »

Marcus wrote:
Sat Aug 27, 2022 12:40 am
MG 2.0 wrote:
Sat Aug 27, 2022 12:11 am


I gave the link.
No you didn't.
Dr Moore wrote:
Mon Aug 15, 2022 8:06 pm
And around and around. MG doesn’t give two craps about data, methodology or logic. All he wants is to get people mad. #ignorethetroll
Pg.15 first post.

Is this all you want to focus on?

Do you not think that this makes sense? Back when you were an active Latter-Day Saint did you not think beyond the end of your nose?

What did perfection mean to you? Was it simply a guilt trip thing?

Regards,
MG
MG 2.0
God
Posts: 3657
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm

Re: How long/intensely did you believe in the historicity of the Book of Mormon?

Post by MG 2.0 »

Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:
Sat Aug 27, 2022 12:44 am
MG 2.0 wrote:
Sat Aug 27, 2022 12:25 am


I think I’m really starting to understand you better. And it’s NOT pretty.

Want to join in with a viable alternative?

You know what we were talking about, right?

Or maybe not…

Regards,
MG
You’re the one that claimed multiple times you’ve studied all the major religions and philosophies of the world and came to the conclusion Mormonism is the bestest one. So, tell us about the years you spent going to mosque and studying the Quran and Sunna so you could scratch that one off the list.

Also, your quick google search ref perfectionism and Islam was way the “F” off, probably because you know jack crap about Islam, no?

- Doc
Is the information incorrect?

https://www.al-islam.org/faith-and-reas ... perfection

We’re back to making a mountain out of a molehill.

Yeah, I spent years going to a mosque.

Where do you come up with this off kilter stuff?

You seem to want to avoid the actual discussion.

Regards,
MG
MG 2.0
God
Posts: 3657
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm

Re: How long/intensely did you believe in the historicity of the Book of Mormon?

Post by MG 2.0 »

Dr Exiled wrote:
Sat Aug 27, 2022 1:45 am
It's just guessing. Anyway, the "plan" I would support is where we come to this world to gain experience in a wild west, uncontrolled world, because without knowledge and how animalistic humans are, we tend to act as we do. This is the only way I can solve the problem of evil in my mind. existence.
Ok, so we now have our first alternative to the Plan of Salvation as taught by the LDS Church.

Do we have any Ayes?

I don’t like it personally. Doesn’t do much for raising stable families. I’ve gotten this far without a gun. I’m hoping to keep it that way.

But thanks for a one sentence replacement to try and state the overall purpose and meaning behind life on earth.

A bit on the short side compared with Seventies Course in Theology.

https://www.gutenberg.org/files/60492/6 ... 0492-h.htm

Regards,
MG
Last edited by MG 2.0 on Sat Aug 27, 2022 2:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
doubtingthomas
God
Posts: 2921
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2021 6:04 pm

Re: How long/intensely did you believe in the historicity of the Book of Mormon?

Post by doubtingthomas »

MG 2.0 wrote:
Sat Aug 27, 2022 2:23 am

You seem to want to avoid the actual discussion.
I'm interested in having a discussion with you.

Do you believe this stuff?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qbss9lGyNlg

I would like to know your opinion.
"I have the type of (REAL) job where I can choose how to spend my time," says Marcus. :roll:
User avatar
Doctor CamNC4Me
God
Posts: 9078
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 2:04 am

Re: How long/intensely did you believe in the historicity of the Book of Mormon?

Post by Doctor CamNC4Me »

MG 2.0 wrote:
Sat Aug 27, 2022 2:23 am
Yeah, I spent years going to a mosque.
:roll:

- Doc
Hugh Nibley claimed he bumped into Adolf Hitler, Albert Einstein, Winston Churchill, Gertrude Stein, and the Grand Duke Vladimir Romanoff. Dishonesty is baked into Mormonism.
MG 2.0
God
Posts: 3657
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm

Re: How long/intensely did you believe in the historicity of the Book of Mormon?

Post by MG 2.0 »

Gadianton wrote:
Sat Aug 27, 2022 2:03 am
I would not be at all surprised to find out that we may have ‘signed on’ to a LIMITED scope/range of experiences before coming to earth.
It's mathematically impossible. All of those Mormon theories about either picking parents, picking challenges, or whatever, would be impossible to work out without predestination being true.

Suppose just one thing was picked for me: I agreed to be in a car accident. That means I have to be born in a time with cars, for one. Subtle implications like this constrain possible events, people have to be born in times and places with tight constraints in order for the details of the events to even be possible, and then everyone's free will has to work out just right so the even happens.

Now just think about all the background assumptions required to make one thing true for every single person. 200,000 spirits agreed to land-mine injuries? There has to be a war, or several wars?, the technology tree has to work out just right to create the kind of weapons that inflict the damage. Another agreed to be born blind. All those agreed to be blind at birth have to have matching gene failures, or mothers in a situation that will cause a birth defect. And they have to be there by their free will. It's absurd.

In fact, it's absurd to believe that the world's population will unfold exactly right in order to equal exactly the number of spirits waiting; without predestination. If you're pro-life, you've got a hot mess to deal with: hundreds of millions agree to enter the fertilized egg and then get aborted? Well, now you have to have a tech tree, the right population level to sustain the numbers, and then the personal decisions of mothers sprouting from life circumstances to match those who agreed to be aborted in the pre-existence.
Limited as in general classifications such as native intelligence (I’m not an Einstein but I was gifted with some natural talents/abilities that let me CHOOSE teaching as a career…I could as well have chosen something else), natural capabilities (I’ll ever be a great orator but I was born with a fairly healthy body with a body mass that let me CHOOSE to take up running as a hobby).

I could go on. As you could also along with the rest of humanity.

So I’m talking about more general classifications such as those above and a myriad of others. Country of origin, ethnic groups, even religious tendencies and spiritual ‘homes’ might be pre planned. Earlier I mentioned matriculation. I think this can play apart as we move around from one mental, physical, spiritual habitation to another. I think that your examples fall more into ‘random acts’ which can happen to any one at any time.

I’m interested in any alternative plans that you have in mind that would fit within some of the parameters I mentioned earlier in which the greatest good could be done for the greatest numbers of humanity…allowing for the fact that we are many and varied and tend towards carnality and natural man tendencies…but can also choose moral behavior which lifts us to service, love, and the progress of the human race. And even a hoped for afterlife of continued progress and happiness.

I’m not sure that I’ve ever seen or heard an atheist/agnostic present a viable plan that would work across the spectrum of complex human behaviors, gifts, abilities, proclivities, and what have you.

Typically, we see folks such as yourself simply trying to tear other systems down.

Regards,
MG
MG 2.0
God
Posts: 3657
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm

Re: How long/intensely did you believe in the historicity of the Book of Mormon?

Post by MG 2.0 »

Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:
Sat Aug 27, 2022 2:39 am
MG 2.0 wrote:
Sat Aug 27, 2022 2:23 am
Yeah, I spent years going to a mosque.
:roll:

- Doc
Kidding!!

You are a very serious man.

Regards,
MG
MG 2.0
God
Posts: 3657
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm

Re: How long/intensely did you believe in the historicity of the Book of Mormon?

Post by MG 2.0 »

Of course I suppose atheists could simply default to no God thus no plan. We’re just making it up as we go along.

I suppose that can work in the here and now. If there’s a hereafter? Not so sure about that. ;)

Regards,
MG
User avatar
canpakes
God
Posts: 7080
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:25 am

Re: How long/intensely did you believe in the historicity of the Book of Mormon?

Post by canpakes »

MG 2.0 wrote:
Fri Aug 26, 2022 8:31 pm
As an alternative plan, what would you suggest?
An immediate lack of an alternative does not render the existing idea believable nor requires any - or even no - alternative proposed.

But, simply ‘knowing God’ - no test elsewhere required - also works.

That also includes maximum agency.
I’m not sure that there is any real agency in this plan to speak of, aside from some very rudimentary choices. Certainly, most of the circumstances that have the greatest impact on your terrestrial existence appear to have been decided for you prior to your mortal birth.

By the way, I think that, as many have said here, not everyone is cut out to be a member of the church, per se. But that doesn’t mean that 99% plus of God’s children aren’t going to find the same fullness and happiness in an afterlife as me, you, or anyone else. None of us were members of a church in a premortal world [if it exist(s) (ed)]. None of us will be members of a church in a post mortal existence (if there is such an existence).

I would not be at all surprised to find out that we may have ‘signed on’ to a LIMITED scope/range of experiences before coming to earth. Kind of like signing up for school. Primary, secondary, and post secondary education. With options to matriculate to further opportunities either here or hereafter.

The primary reason for coming to earth is to gain a physical body and gain experience.
Why? Both that body and that experience are non-applicable to the post-mortal life. In an eternal, post mortal life within an ‘optimized’ body - as Mormonism suggests - what purpose is served by the knowledge of disease? Physical suffering? Death? Flowers? Mental illness? The taste of baklava? Drunkenness?

If that experience is not to be had here then it will come later albeit under different conditions.
But, that typically cannot happen. Again, in a perfected eternal form, I’ll never have need of experiencing the bemused inconvenience of my children’s socks disappearing from a dryer, nor need of being slowly and repeatedly stabbed with the horrifying pain of watching one of them slip, bit by fragile bit, from mortal existence via a cancer that ravaged their young body, ultimately stripping them of their desperate and innocent life.

Or anything in between.

The things that would matter in an eternal existence apply to an eternal existence, and are likely best learned via a process not limited to a lifespan randomized between one hour, and 100+ years, while restricted to a relatively tiny rock. And you would already have been aware of those before your mortal visit.

There will be enough folks that have matriculated through the ‘earth program’ that they may well be able to help others along the way in the hereafter.
Help others to do what, exactly? Decide that the God that they are subject to in the afterlife - a God that they can clearly see and experience at that point - is the God that they are subject to in the afterlife?

There are so many paths towards enlightenment and perfection. Mormonism teaches that we reach perfection within a sphere unique to ourselves. My perfection is going to vary from yours. The point is, we are reaching towards completeness/wholeness. Different strokes for different folks. So the fact so few sentient beings that experience earth life do so as members of the ‘true church’ doesn’t really matter.
Does the nature of these differences carry weight in an afterlife? Does Jeffrey Holland’s decades spent trying to keep people devoted to and paying into a church that serves no purpose within the eternal afterlife count as more significant than the doctor in Senegal who has never heard of the Book of Mormon, but has spent most of his adult years fighting against disease, and for the health of his community neighbors?

They are gaining similar experiences that they can take into an afterlife.

Work, love, discipline, family, etc.
Were any of these concepts unknown in the premortal existence? Why would knowledge of them need to be provided within a terrestrial environment?

Terryl Givens proposes that the main difference between Mormons and everyone else is that we have been given authority to build and operate temples and the performance of ordinances necessary for both salvation and/or exaltation. Work for EVERYONE, not just those that are members of the LDS Church.
Terryl proposes that temples operate to perform ordinances that have no meaning in a post-mortal life, for what ends?

I think God’s plan is much bigger than we suppose, but I also am of the opinion that the work that the church does through those that accept the fullness of the gospel is critically important in the work of salvation and/or exaltation of God’s children.
What prevented a spirit from being ‘exalted’ prior to assignment on a terrestrial plane?

The emphasis you place on numbers aren’t of any great consequence.
In fact, they weren’t any consequence at all prior to around 1830, before which untold millions were presented with a terrestrial lifespan and no way to follow the supposed Plan.

God already knows what that ratio of ‘members’ vs. ‘nonmembers’ is going to be and He’s planned out for it.

D&C 76 gives a general outline of how BIG the plan is and how all encompassing. Especially when compared with general Christianity.

Somehow and somewhere along the line I do think that every knee shall bow and every tongue confess that Jesus is the Christ.
Why would that ever have been necessary via a quick mortal stint in the first place if you literally lived with the guy in your pre-existence?

The only perfect Son of God. But that doesn’t necessarily mean we will all follow Him. We will have agency in an afterlife just as we do here. And yes, we will still travel our own path as we do here, but with the knowledge that there is a Godhead and an overall plan which played a part in the life we came from while on earth.
There was no reason to create a terrestrial godhead - after forcibly removing your knowledge of God - in order to possibly get you to believe in a God that you were already aware of and acknowledged in the pre-mortal state.

Unless this was done purely for the amusement of the God in question.
User avatar
Gadianton
God
Posts: 4001
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2020 11:56 pm
Location: Elsewhere

Re: How long/intensely did you believe in the historicity of the Book of Mormon?

Post by Gadianton »

Country of origin, ethnic groups, even religious tendencies
Planning every single person's country of origin and ethnicity would require absolute predestination.
greatest good could be done for the greatest numbers of humanity
Assuming an omnipotent God, it would be trivial to imagine a world where far greater good is done for the average person than this one.

It's no use suggesting anything because your argument is entirely circular. How ever things happen to be is the best way you can imagine it, any suggestion of material benefit to someone lacking something immediately raises the alarm of interfering with agency. Any point made about excessive suffering immediately brings the possibility that the challenge was agreed upon in the pre-existence by the person, and that specific circumstance was the absolute best thing God and the individual could come up with for that person's growth.

The very way you state your proposal is a problem because "greatest good for the greatest number of humans" comes from Jeremy Bentham, the utilitarian philosopher. There isn't the wiggle room you imagine in this notion of 'good'. Sure, you can redefine "good" to mean whatever you want it to be, and then say that Bentham was a stepping stone towards this grander, very flexible idea of 'good' that just happens to work out perfectly for Mormonism. Granting you a flexible version of consequentialism that allows you to adjust all the tradeoffs needed to make everything as it is exactly what it should be -- the consequence of agency balancing with the consequence of material benefit, for instance, to justify the state as-is of every rich person and every poor person -- step back, and from a biological perspective, even a very broad notion of 'good' equating to what best benefits humans is a problem. From a biological perspective, what we're saying is that the greatest good = the survival of the ultimate invasive species.

As much as I'd like to solve world hunger, stepping back a little, I think it's ridiculous to believe the highest levels of 'goodness' require animals to be confined, farmed, and slaughtered brutally in order for humans to have easy lives. But even if we imagine future tech that allows us to work around hurting animals, the idea of goodness in the abstract still reduces to preserving the ultimate invasive species, which is just silly.
Post Reply