Re: searching "old board" user posts

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
User avatar
Dr Moore
Endowed Chair of Historical Innovation
Posts: 1818
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2020 2:16 pm
Location: Cassius University

Re: searching "old board" user posts

Post by Dr Moore »

Hi all, in response to a threat where Symmachus lamented being unable to find old posts, please see the tip in the "Helpful hints" sticky thread.

If you follow those steps, you can easily get to a page where you're able to scroll or keyword search through old user posts.
User avatar
Moksha
God
Posts: 5875
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 3:13 am
Location: Koloburbia

Re: searching "old board" user posts

Post by Moksha »

A post on the old MAD board once proved the Book of Mormon was true. Unfortunately, it and most other posts needed to be removed when Dr. Daniel Peterson was requested to testify in the Brian David Mitchell trial (Elizabeth Smart). It was feared that the defense lawyer would use the MAD posts corpus to impeach Dr. Peterson's testimony. No use searching, that proof of the truthfulness of the Book has been removed from the earth. However, Dr. Peterson's testimony at the trial did help establish that Mitchell was not an Old Testament prophet, which if left unchallenged may have swayed a Utah jury (It cannot be overemphasized how influential a person can be when claiming the mantle of a prophet and practicing plural marriage).

The suspect information at the MAD board needed to be sacrificed for the greater end so that Dr. Peterson could bear his witness. It was a fruitful Exhortation and Testimony Meeting. Mitchell was lucky he was not fitted with a noose and placed on a bucking tapir that day once Dr. Peterson finished with "In the name of Jesus Christ, Amen".

What would have impeached Dr. Peterson's testimony? Why Mormon apologetics, of course!
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
Post Reply