Sic et Non Is Dead

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Fence Sitter
Teacher
Posts: 259
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 2:02 am

Re: Sic et Non Is Dead

Post by Fence Sitter »

Binger wrote:
Thu Sep 22, 2022 2:15 pm
Fence Sitter wrote:
Thu Sep 22, 2022 2:02 pm
I don't think so. Banning is an extremely rare event here. Dissenters tend to get overwhelmed. Who are you thinking about?
That is one of the funniest posts ever posted on this forum.

Well done. I really laughed.
You seem unable to read for context.
But are easily amused.
huckelberry
God
Posts: 1382
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 3:48 pm

Re: Sic et Non Is Dead

Post by huckelberry »

Fence Sitter wrote:
Thu Sep 22, 2022 5:27 pm
Binger wrote:
Thu Sep 22, 2022 2:15 pm


That is one of the funniest posts ever posted on this forum.

Well done. I really laughed.
You seem unable to read for context.
But are easily amused.
a point of curiosity here, did Smokey actually get banned or did he just tire of posting stuff. I wondered a couple of times if the persona and point of view was all just a fiction which the author tired of so ended and adopted a new different persona.
User avatar
Moksha
God
Posts: 3856
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 3:13 am
Location: Koloburbia

Re: Sic et Non Is Dead

Post by Moksha »

If Binger were in an oyster, he would have a pearl form around him.
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
User avatar
Binger
God
Posts: 4457
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2021 12:34 am

Re: Sic et Non Is Dead

Post by Binger »

Moksha wrote:
Thu Sep 22, 2022 10:45 pm
If Binger were in an oyster, he would have a pearl form around him.
Thane Queue.
huckelberry
God
Posts: 1382
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 3:48 pm

Re: Sic et Non Is Dead

Post by huckelberry »

huckelberry wrote:
Thu Sep 22, 2022 10:42 pm
a point of curiosity here, did Smokey actually get banned or did he just tire of posting stuff. I wondered a couple of times if the persona and point of view was all just a fiction which the author tired of so ended and adopted a new different persona.
Upthread it was observed a couple of times that banning a poster is rare. Binger thought that funny, doubting its accuracy I would think. I am aware of limits put on some posters for a period of time. I think LDSfaqs could only start threads in a limited forum. It limited the number of youtube links from him.

Is a question about actual banning somehow off limits or private?
Does anybody actually know?
MG 2.0
God
Posts: 1832
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm

Re: Sic et Non Is Dead

Post by MG 2.0 »

huckelberry wrote:
Fri Sep 23, 2022 7:11 pm
huckelberry wrote:
Thu Sep 22, 2022 10:42 pm
a point of curiosity here, did Smokey actually get banned or did he just tire of posting stuff. I wondered a couple of times if the persona and point of view was all just a fiction which the author tired of so ended and adopted a new different persona.
Upthread it was observed a couple of times that banning a poster is rare. Binger thought that funny, doubting its accuracy I would think. I am aware of limits put on some posters for a period of time. I think LDSfaqs could only start threads in a limited forum. It limited the number of youtube links from him.

Is a question about actual banning somehow off limits or private?
Does anybody actually know?
I was banned. Kidney stone today. Sitting around in pain. Should be reading a book.

Regards,
MG
huckelberry
God
Posts: 1382
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 3:48 pm

Re: Sic et Non Is Dead

Post by huckelberry »

Mg, your response creates more question than clarification.You are posting now so are obviously not banned. What sort of temporary ban are you referring to?
User avatar
Kishkumen
God
Posts: 3511
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:37 pm
Location: Cassius University

Re: Sic et Non Is Dead

Post by Kishkumen »

MG 2.0 wrote:
Fri Sep 23, 2022 7:18 pm
I was banned. Kidney stone today. Sitting around in pain. Should be reading a book.

Regards,
MG
I hope you feel better. Kidney stones are the worst. Get well and see you soon!
"Stubborn audacity is the last refuge of guilt." ~ Samuel Johnson
User avatar
Kishkumen
God
Posts: 3511
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:37 pm
Location: Cassius University

Re: Sic et Non Is Dead

Post by Kishkumen »

huckelberry wrote:
Thu Sep 22, 2022 10:42 pm
a point of curiosity here, did Smokey actually get banned or did he just tire of posting stuff. I wondered a couple of times if the persona and point of view was all just a fiction which the author tired of so ended and adopted a new different persona.
Smokey was a board terrorist. If there was anyone who should have been banned--I thought he was--it was Smokey.
"Stubborn audacity is the last refuge of guilt." ~ Samuel Johnson
MG 2.0
God
Posts: 1832
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm

Re: Sic et Non Is Dead

Post by MG 2.0 »

huckelberry wrote:
Fri Sep 23, 2022 8:51 pm
Mg, your response creates more question than clarification.You are posting now so are obviously not banned. What sort of temporary ban are you referring to?
This was a few years ago. Back in my wilder days. Thanks Kishkumen. No one home today except me and the kidney stone. Not fun at all.

Regards,
MG
Post Reply