Internet Mormons, Chapel Mormons, Critics, Apologists, and Never-Mo's all welcome!
https://discussmormonism.com/
That's what you get for not obeying the WoW and sneaking Snapple Iced Tea into your garage.
Kishkumen, I agree hence my question. My inclination is to be tolerant but I felt Smokey exceeded my tolerance limits.Kishkumen wrote: ↑Fri Sep 23, 2022 8:56 pmSmokey was a board terrorist. If there was anyone who should have been banned--I thought he was--it was Smokey.huckelberry wrote: ↑Thu Sep 22, 2022 10:42 pma point of curiosity here, did Smokey actually get banned or did he just tire of posting stuff. I wondered a couple of times if the persona and point of view was all just a fiction which the author tired of so ended and adopted a new different persona.
Sorry to hear about your kidney stone. That's a pain I would not wish on anyone.MG 2.0 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 23, 2022 7:18 pmI was banned. Kidney stone today. Sitting around in pain. Should be reading a book.huckelberry wrote: ↑Fri Sep 23, 2022 7:11 pm
Upthread it was observed a couple of times that banning a poster is rare. Binger thought that funny, doubting its accuracy I would think. I am aware of limits put on some posters for a period of time. I think LDSfaqs could only start threads in a limited forum. It limited the number of youtube links from him.
Is a question about actual banning somehow off limits or private?
Does anybody actually know?
Regards,
MG