https://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeters ... qus_threadBut yes, we thought it a good idea to have our book come out near the much-trumpeted publication date of Method Infinite. I don't see anything wrong with that.
Bradshaw remaining silent on the matter?
Meanwhile Peterson distances himself and Interpreter from one of its own VP's...
Should Interpreter not suspend Bradshaw (and take down his publication) whilst they investigate this?One clarification about the Loyd Ericson matter probably needs to be made here: Of course I'm not claiming that a book published by the Interpreter Foundation has no connection with the Interpreter Foundation. (I thought that would be obvious, but apparently it wasn't. Nothing is impossible to miss for those who're strongly disinclined to see.)
But the offense, if such there actually was, doesn't lie in Interpreter's having simply published a book. It lies, if it lies anywhere, in the manner by which Jeff Bradshaw -- not Interpreter -- obtained an Advance Reader Copy of the book, which he then used, to some degree at least, in completing his own book, which was then submitted to the Interpreter Foundation for eventual publication. And of that topic I know essentially nothing beyond Loyd Ericson's claims. I hadn't heard of any complaint in this regard, let alone of Mr. Ericson's claims about it, until very late last night.