How Much Money Has Royal Skousen Made from Mopologetics?

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
User avatar
Everybody Wang Chung
God
Posts: 1623
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:52 am

Re: How Much Money Has Royal Skousen Made from Mopologetics?

Post by Everybody Wang Chung »

Last week DCP was sincerely asked by one of his regular commentors what the presence of Early Modern English means for the Book of Mormon.
“DCP” wrote: DanielPeterson baxter999
7 days ago

baxter999: "What exactly does the dictated text being Early Modern English mean?"

DCP: Dunno. Not exactly, anyway.
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeters ... qus_thread

After spending close to a million dollars on this “research” DCP still can’t explain what it means. But that hasn’t stopped him from lashing out at anyone who dares question or expresses their opinion.
"I'm on paid sabbatical from BYU in exchange for my promise to use this time to finish two books."

Daniel C. Peterson, 2014
Alphus and Omegus
Area Authority
Posts: 603
Joined: Thu May 13, 2021 8:41 pm

Re: How Much Money Has Royal Skousen Made from Mopologetics?

Post by Alphus and Omegus »

Everybody Wang Chung wrote:
Tue Nov 22, 2022 12:11 am
Last week DCP was sincerely asked by one of his regular commentors what the presence of Early Modern English means for the Book of Mormon.
“DCP” wrote: DanielPeterson baxter999
7 days ago

baxter999: "What exactly does the dictated text being Early Modern English mean?"

DCP: Dunno. Not exactly, anyway.
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeters ... qus_thread

After spending close to a million dollars on this “research” DCP still can’t explain what it means. But that hasn’t stopped him from lashing out at anyone who dares question or expresses their opinion.
Sounds like it means that DCP just blew a million bucks with nothing to show for it. All they've done is shown that Joseph Smith knew his KJV very well. Which we already knew.
User avatar
Moksha
God
Posts: 5810
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 3:13 am
Location: Koloburbia

Re: How Much Money Has Royal Skousen Made from Mopologetics?

Post by Moksha »

Could someone post a few of those Early English sentences from the Book of Mormon?

For example: "A Knyght ther was, and that a worthy man, that fro the tyme that he first bigan to riden out, he loved Mormanie, trouthe and honóur, fredom and curteisie."
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
User avatar
Doctor Scratch
B.H. Roberts Chair of Mopologetic Studies
Posts: 1161
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 7:24 pm
Location: Cassius University

Re: How Much Money Has Royal Skousen Made from Mopologetics?

Post by Doctor Scratch »

Tom:

Would you happen to have a ballpark figure—or an exact one—on how much money Interpreter has paid to Skousen?
"If, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
Philo Sofee
God
Posts: 5015
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 1:18 am

Re: How Much Money Has Royal Skousen Made from Mopologetics?

Post by Philo Sofee »

I honestly suspect they are just trying their best to make sure Royal Skousen's life's work has not been a complete waste of time with obviously no useful conclusions after such deft and thorough scholarship on the matter. It is truly one of the saddest spectacles I have ever seen in Mormonism.
Tom
Area Authority
Posts: 613
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:41 pm

Re: How Much Money Has Royal Skousen Made from Mopologetics?

Post by Tom »

The last solid figure I had was $329,289.65: viewtopic.php?p=18288#p18288

I don’t know if Dr. Skousen received additional funding in 2021 or this year. A specific line expense for Critical Text volume III appeared for the last time in the Interpreter Foundation’s expense report for the fourth quarter of 2020.
Last edited by Tom on Tue Nov 22, 2022 1:14 am, edited 1 time in total.
“But if you are told by your leader to do a thing, do it. None of your business whether it is right or wrong.” Heber C. Kimball, 8 Nov. 1857
Marcus
God
Posts: 5033
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:44 pm

Re: How Much Money Has Royal Skousen Made from Mopologetics?

Post by Marcus »

Thank you, gentlemen, for the salubrious pushback on my post...
I was about to add my thoughts. But, this sentence brought me up short. Maybe some do not realize the impact of such limiting language. But it does have an impact. An ice-cold, divisive impact.

At some point, one would think we could just address participants in --and even readers of-- a discussion without language that acknowledges only half of them.
User avatar
Dr Moore
Endowed Chair of Historical Innovation
Posts: 1812
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2020 2:16 pm
Location: Cassius University

Re: How Much Money Has Royal Skousen Made from Mopologetics?

Post by Dr Moore »

Marcus wrote:
Tue Nov 22, 2022 1:14 am
Thank you, gentlemen, for the salubrious pushback on my post...
I was about to add my thoughts. But, this sentence brought me up short. Maybe some do not realize the impact of such limiting language. But it does have an impact. An ice-cold, divisive impact.

At some point, one would think we could just address participants in --and even readers of-- a discussion without language that acknowledges only half of them.
I hear this, but believe the intention was merely to acknowledge the few who pushed back on his message, each of whom to my knowledge are male. Unless I’ve missed something upthread.

Separately, I was hoping Marcus would weigh in because it amazes - blows the mind - that Intetpreter continues to support an apologetic in which Early Modern English stands as one of the two MOST convincing evidences for Book of Mormon historicity. This is easily seen in Rasmussen’s “Estimating the Evidence” work of half-humor, half-apologetic, pornography project. His essays are sprinkled with incorrectly applied math, and the stench of bad science remains on the site. It is ironically, one of the strongest evidences against the intellectual seriousness of Interpreter.

The reason I bring this up via Marcus is: apologetically speaking, Early Modern English objectively is stronger evidence of a 19th century creative effort than a pre-Christian ancient epoch. And, if the strongest evidence in favor of a mathematical development can be validly (and more simply) argued to prove the opposite conclusion, then in practice we would expect 100% of serious scholars to dismiss the project out of hand. Is there any reason to expect otherwise? This one point in Kyler’s misguided work is so clearly a case of motivated reasoning, there’s no point in engaging. It’s flat earther level of stupidity.

I’m convinced this is why Kyler refused an easy $10,000 when I offered it if he would subject his essays to a thorough review by a sitting BYU professor of stats. While BYU isn’t Stanford, my experience is that most of its professors in the hard sciences are actually quite serious scholars who really do give a damn about their academic reputations.
Marcus
God
Posts: 5033
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:44 pm

Re: How Much Money Has Royal Skousen Made from Mopologetics?

Post by Marcus »

Dr Moore wrote:
Tue Nov 22, 2022 1:28 am
Marcus wrote:
Tue Nov 22, 2022 1:14 am

I was about to add my thoughts. But, this sentence brought me up short. Maybe some do not realize the impact of such limiting language. But it does have an impact. An ice-cold, divisive impact.

At some point, one would think we could just address participants in --and even readers of-- a discussion without language that acknowledges only half of them.
I hear this, but [ I ] believe the intention....
Of course. The good intention is always there. You make a strong point, but we are a small group of contributors and readers and I'm just past the point where not intending to exclude is an acceptable excuse for exclusionary language.

Separately, I was hoping Marcus would weigh in because it amazes - blows the mind - that Intetpreter continues to support an apologetic in which Early Modern English stands as one of the two MOST convincing evidences for Book of Mormon historicity. This is easily seen in Rasmussen’s “Estimating the Evidence” work of half-humor, half-apologetic, pornography project. His essays are sprinkled with incorrectly applied math, and the stench of bad science remains on the site. It is ironically, one of the strongest evidences against the intellectual seriousness of Interpreter.

The reason I bring this up via Marcus is: apologetically speaking, Early Modern English objectively is stronger evidence of a 19th century creative effort than a pre-Christian ancient epoch. And, if the strongest evidence in favor of a mathematical development can be validly (and more simply) argued to prove the opposite conclusion, then in practice we would expect 100% of serious scholars to dismiss the project out of hand. Is there any reason to expect otherwise? This one point in Kyler’s misguided work is so clearly a case of motivated reasoning, there’s no point in engaging. It’s flat earther level of stupidity.
I spent some time this afternoon reviewing past threads documenting Early Modern English arguments and marshalling some specific arguments. I'll post some comments soon for the various gentlepeople following the thread.
Informant
CTR B
Posts: 154
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2022 1:56 am
Location: Woodshed
Contact:

Re: How Much Money Has Royal Skousen Made from Mopologetics?

Post by Informant »

Marcus wrote:
Tue Nov 22, 2022 1:14 am
Thank you, gentlemen, for the salubrious pushback on my post...
I was about to add my thoughts. But, this sentence brought me up short. Maybe some do not realize the impact of such limiting language. But it does have an impact. An ice-cold, divisive impact.

At some point, one would think we could just address participants in --and even readers of-- a discussion without language that acknowledges only half of them.
It’s the academic LARPing. There are very few female professors in the idealized (fantasy) academic halls of 100 years ago.
Post Reply