Page 1 of 2
DCP takes a strange misogynistic shot at Kate “what’s-her-name” Kelly
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2022 4:41 pm
by drumdude
He felt the urgent need yesterday evening to inform his readers that he has not been thinking about her.
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeters ... -name.html
“DCP” wrote: I realized this evening that I haven’t about nor even thought about Kate Kelly, the former leader (?) of Ordain Women, for a very long time. Maybe I just haven’t been listening or don’t move in the right circles.
Re: DCP takes a strange misogynistic shot at Kate “what’s-her-name” Kelly
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2022 4:56 pm
by Kishkumen
He did a good job of proving her point, as defending the church seems to have inspired him to misread and/or misrepresent her quote in the Guardian.
Re: DCP takes a strange misogynistic shot at Kate “what’s-her-name” Kelly
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2022 7:55 pm
by Wonhyo
Kate Kelly probably hasn't thought about DCP for a while, either, if ever...
On a side note, DCP's linked post mentions Dan McClellan and his growing influence on TikTok (the subject of an active thread here on the Terrestrial Forum). And he also mentions an Interpreter article on Psalm 82 that Mak wrote in 2015, a topic about which DCP had earlier penned a different opinion.
DCP's pathological inability to be wrong on a given issue, to admit that he's mistaken, to leave his butt-hurts in the past, and to reconsider erroneous positions is supremely entertaining. If we were living in centuries past, DCP would have made an excellent leader of the Catholic Inquisition.
Re: DCP takes a strange misogynistic shot at Kate “what’s-her-name” Kelly
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2022 10:11 pm
by Tom
drumdude wrote: ↑Sun Dec 11, 2022 4:41 pm
He felt the urgent need yesterday evening to inform his readers that he has not been thinking about her.
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeters ... -name.html
“DCP” wrote: I realized this evening that I haven’t about nor even thought about Kate Kelly, the former leader (?) of Ordain Women, for a very long time. Maybe I just haven’t been listening or don’t move in the right circles.
In this case, “a very long time” means since August 2022:
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeters ... esent.html.
I haven’t heard much in recent years about Kate Kelly, the former leader (?) of Ordain Women. Maybe I just haven’t been listening, or perhaps I don’t move in the right circles. I’m afraid that I also don’t think about her very much. However, in looking for something else, I’ve just run across these two items, from blog entries that I posted all the way back in February 2015, and — I dunno — I still like them.
Re: DCP takes a strange misogynistic shot at Kate “what’s-her-name” Kelly
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2022 10:19 pm
by Kishkumen
Re: DCP takes a strange misogynistic shot at Kate “what’s-her-name” Kelly
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2022 10:21 pm
by Res Ipsa
Wait. Let me make sure I understand this. Peterson literally copy-pasted his blog entry from August about Kelly, which says he can’t recall the last time he thought about her?
I’m not sure that rises to the level of phoning it in.
Re: DCP takes a strange misogynistic shot at Kate “what’s-her-name” Kelly
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2022 10:43 pm
by Tator
Pasterson the plagiarist, plagiarizes Peterson.
Re: DCP takes a strange misogynistic shot at Kate “what’s-her-name” Kelly
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2022 11:30 pm
by Doctor CamNC4Me
So, in one blog post he craps on two people. Huh.
We all know what you've been through, and it hasn't been easy, but in the world of our Heavenly Father it is that very opposition, that very challenging trials, that opens up visions and avenues and doors and everything that brings to pass at Interpreter Foundation.
Dan is the primary victim of his pissing people off. Ugh. Poor little kitten.
On an interesting aside, he welcomes two new board members, one is a Bible guy and the other is a money guy. I’m not quite sure what that means, but it did raise an eyebrow.
- Doc
Re: DCP takes a strange misogynistic shot at Kate “what’s-her-name” Kelly
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2022 4:58 pm
by IHAQ
Tom wrote: ↑Sun Dec 11, 2022 10:11 pm
In this case, “a very long time” means since August 2022:
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeters ... esent.html.
I haven’t heard much in recent years about Kate Kelly, the former leader (?) of Ordain Women. Maybe I just haven’t been listening, or perhaps I don’t move in the right circles. I’m afraid that I also don’t think about her very much. However, in looking for something else, I’ve just run across these two items, from blog entries that I posted all the way back in February 2015, and — I dunno — I still like them.
He really is a pillock.
Re: DCP takes a strange misogynistic shot at Kate “what’s-her-name” Kelly
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2022 5:04 pm
by IHAQ
October 2018
I haven’t been hearing much lately about Kate Kelly, the former leader (?) of Ordain Women. Maybe I just haven’t been listening, or don’t move in the right circles. I’m afraid that I also don’t think about her very much.
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeterson?s=Kate+kelly
August 2022
I haven’t heard much in recent years about Kate Kelly, the former leader (?) of Ordain Women. Maybe I just haven’t been listening, or perhaps I don’t move in the right circles. I’m afraid that I also don’t think about her very much.
December 2022
I realized this evening that I haven’t heard about nor even thought about Kate Kelly, the former leader (?) of Ordain Women, for a very long time. Maybe I just haven’t been listening or don’t move in the right circles.
