Page 1 of 3
Gee's Review of Tamas Mekis' book on Hypocephalus
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2022 12:21 am
by hauslern
Can someone tell me how I upload the review to here?
Dr Dee
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2022 1:18 am
by Shulem
Dr Dee wrote:
4.0 out of 5 stars A fantastic compilation of hypocephali.
Reviewed in the United States on 10 June 2021
Verified Purchase
The book was in perfect condition. No problems there. Fantastic packaging. Wow! A few references I found so far that refers to incorrect photos or reflect incorrect page numbers, but nothing too serious. Beautifully laid out, easy to read, and lovely reproductions of hypocephali. The research I felt was very mechanical and the author limited himself by sticking strictly to a literal translation and not bringing in the theological meaning of the iconography and phrases and as such I feel his study, (as detailed and meticulous as it is, and he did a great job with that), is not as full flavoured as it could have been. So what like cooking rice without adding salt. It's still rice, but it's "empty" ....
Re: Gee's Review of Tamas Mekis' book on Hypocephalus
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2022 1:28 am
by Philo Sofee
If he had put something in to confirm the Book of Abraham Gee would have slobbered all over it and called it a steak...
Gee is such a dolt. Just how looooooong has Gee had so many hypocephali and written nothing on them? when will he ever move beyond mere introductions in his work and research?
Re: Gee's Review of Tamas Mekis' book on Hypocephalus
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2022 2:58 am
by Dr. Shades
hauslern wrote: ↑Tue Dec 13, 2022 12:21 am
Can someone tell me how I upload the review to here?
Just copy and paste the URL here, tell us a little about it, and we'll click on it.
Re: Dr Dee
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2022 8:33 am
by IHAQ
Shulem wrote: ↑Tue Dec 13, 2022 1:18 am
Dr Dee wrote:
4.0 out of 5 stars A fantastic compilation of hypocephali.
Reviewed in the United States on 10 June 2021
Verified Purchase
The book was in perfect condition. No problems there. Fantastic packaging. Wow! A few references I found so far that refers to incorrect photos or reflect incorrect page numbers, but nothing too serious. Beautifully laid out, easy to read, and lovely reproductions of hypocephali. The research I felt was very mechanical and the author limited himself by sticking strictly to a literal translation and not bringing in the theological meaning of the iconography and phrases and as such I feel his study, (as detailed and meticulous as it is, and he did a great job with that), is not as full flavoured as it could have been. So what like cooking rice without adding salt. It's still rice, but it's "empty" ....
The author stuck with a literal translation rather than adding a subjective religious flight of fancy interpretation to everything, and that's a problem?
Re: Gee's Review of Tamas Mekis' book on Hypocephalus
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2022 8:35 am
by IHAQ
hauslern wrote: ↑Tue Dec 13, 2022 12:21 am
Can someone tell me how I upload the review to here?
Mekis deserves gratitude for an outstanding achievement in gathering and organizing a wealth of material that will make studying hypocephali much easier in the future. He has also put forward a coherent interpretation. Though other interpretations are possible and will doubtlessly be forthcoming, he has at least provided a target for others to tilt at. This work should be the new starting point for future study.’ – John Gee
https://www.amazon.sg/Hypocephalus-Anci ... 1789693330
Re: Gee's Review of Tamas Mekis' book on Hypocephalus
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2022 6:31 pm
by Shulem
Product description Review, Gee wrote:- Mekis deserves gratitude for an outstanding achievement in gathering and organizing a wealth of material that will make studying hypocephali much easier in the future.
- He has also put forward a coherent interpretation.
Ok
Product description Review, Gee wrote:Though other interpretations are possible and will doubtlessly be forthcoming, he has at least provided a target for others to tilt at.
What other interpretations are possible other than a correct one? You mean, Joe Smith's?
Other interpretations are
forthcoming? Oh, really? What and when?
At least provided? You ungrateful SOB! Why didn't you do this work during your long career as an Egyptologist? What held you back from providing a target for other (Egyptologists) to tilt at?
You, John Gee, are an ass.
Liar Gee
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2022 9:20 pm
by Shulem
Joseph Smith, Times and Seasons, 1842 wrote:
Fig. 8. Contains writings that cannot be revealed unto the world; but is to be had in the Holy Temple of God.
Perhaps John Gee would like to come here to this forum, right now, and explain to me how the living ba-spirit of Osiris Sheshonq has anything to do with Joseph Smith's temple in Nauvoo. How does invoking the name of the god
Osiris have anything to do with salvation through Christ? Has the Mormon temple become the habitation of Egyptian gods and idols?
Gee, you're a Goddamn snake in the grass. You're crooked, dude. You are not getting away with it because you've been pinned down and beaten. You have lied to everyone but most importantly, to yourself! When you get up every morning and look at yourself in the mirror you are looking at the face of a liar. What a horrible way to live.
Re: Gee's Review of Tamas Mekis' book on Hypocephalus
Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2022 1:19 am
by Shulem
Product description Review, Gee wrote:Though other interpretations are possible and will doubtlessly be forthcoming
Oh really? Is that a fact?
I'm absolutely positive that Joseph Smith's translations and interpretations will never find a place in the Cairo Museum. Never!
Dream on, Gee. I'm calling your bluff! You're full of it.
Re: Gee's Review of Tamas Mekis' book on Hypocephalus
Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2022 8:23 pm
by Tom
hauslern wrote: ↑Tue Dec 13, 2022 12:21 am
Can someone tell me how I upload the review to here?
Do you have a copy of the full review?
