DiscussMormonism.com

If you've ever been to William Schryver's Twitter account, you've seen another level of crazy. It's mainly comprised of climate change denials, anti-vaccination tweets, tweets about how Trump should be reinstated and how Putin's Russia is the most righteous country in the world.

William is also one of the biggest cheerleaders for the Russian invasion of Ukraine. But lately, his tweets have seemed to take an even darker, more sinister tone. Here is William Schryver publicly advocating and yearning for Russia to "kill" Ukrainians.

William Comrade Schryver wrote:As the operational encirclement of Bakhmut approaches, I sure hope the Russians are smart enough to not duplicate George Meade's blunder after Gettysburg: permitting the beaten enemy army to escape. They need to kill or capture the entire body of AFU troops trapped in Bakhmut.

https://Twitter.com/imetatronink/status ... CQmO8sAAAA

I have no idea how William Schryver can reconcile his desire for the death of Ukraninians with the teachings of the Savior. I can imagine the hurt and confusion Mormons in Ukraine might feel reading William Schryver's tweets longing for their deaths. WIth members like William Schryver, the church doesn't need any enemies.

William Schryver. FAIR author, Mormon and Priesthood holder.

https://www.fairlatterdaysaints.org/aut ... ryver-will

William Schryver is a turd monster. It should be noted he’s well-regarded by Mopologists, has kept his temple recommend, and is a member in good standing in the Mormon church. Perhaps Symmachus will be good enough to let us know why William “Moscow” Schryver is the cat’s pajamas and Russia is, in fact, justified murdering Ukrainians and taking over Europe.

- Doc

Schryver is a nut.

And yet the first presidency refused to let Lavina Fielding Anderson back in.


They’ve got their priorities straight.

He could be intrigued that the C-word starts with an S-sound in the Cyrillic alphabet.

drumdude wrote: ↑

Sun Jan 22, 2023 4:47 am

And yet the first presidency refused to let Lavina Fielding Anderson back in.


They’ve got their priorities straight.

“Elder Oaks” wrote: It's wrong to criticize leaders of the Church, even if the criticism is true.

Kishkumen wrote: ↑

Sun Jan 22, 2023 1:07 pm

drumdude wrote: ↑

Sun Jan 22, 2023 4:47 am

And yet the first presidency refused to let Lavina Fielding Anderson back in.


They’ve got their priorities straight.

“Elder Oaks” wrote: It's wrong to criticize leaders of the Church, even if the criticism is true.

Of course it is. Catch-22 vibes