John Gee and the length of the Book of Abraham etc

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
hauslern
Bishop
Posts: 489
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2020 2:36 am

John Gee and the length of the Book of Abraham etc

Post by hauslern »

The interpreter has a radio show with John Gee talking about the length of the original Book of Abraham. Argues from historical sources that we do not have all the papyri Smith had in his possession. Gee talked about a recent discovery of a Book of the Dead scroll which was 10 meters or 45 feet long:

https://interpreterfoundation.org/inter ... ent-532001

Both Skousen and Givens seem to take the view that the Book of Abraham was given by revelation.

Smith and Cook have debated the issue:

https://www.dialoguejournal.com/article ... ll-of-hor/
User avatar
Shulem
God
Posts: 7090
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:40 am
Location: Facsimile No. 3

“King Pharaoh, whose name is given in the characters above his head”

Post by Shulem »

We have and can SEE all the characters written in the label of Facsimile No. 3, directly above the head of Isis. There is no king’s name therein. Joseph Smith was wrong. The Explanation tendered in the Facsimile publication is false. There is no Cartouche to signify a royal name. There is nothing John Gee can do or say to convert that hieroglyphic writing into a king’s name.

John Gee, you suck!
User avatar
Shulem
God
Posts: 7090
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:40 am
Location: Facsimile No. 3

Long Roll

Post by Shulem »

John Gee 12:52 wrote:None of the fragments we have qualifies as being part of the long roll.

THAT IS A LIE. THE FRAGMENTS WE HAVE CAME FROM THE ROLLS POSSESSED BY JOSEPH SMITH!

Only in John Gee's warped imagination is there a long roll that has nothing to do with the existing fragments.
User avatar
Shulem
God
Posts: 7090
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:40 am
Location: Facsimile No. 3

Re: John Gee and the length of the Book of Abraham etc

Post by Shulem »

John Gee 14:48 wrote:I can read the stuff and am a Book of the Dead specialist

Fig. 5. Shulem, one of the king’s principal waiters, as represented by the characters above his hand.

Image

Show me the name "Shulem" in the writing of the label, John.

Show me!
User avatar
Shulem
God
Posts: 7090
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:40 am
Location: Facsimile No. 3

Written by his own hand...

Post by Shulem »

John Gee 21:50 wrote:People say, well, these are Egyptian papyri, and they are from the Ptolemaic Period and so they can’t be Abraham’s handwriting. But that’s not what the text says, so the text says, that this was called, and this seems to be the ancient title, “The Book of Abraham, written by his own hand, upon papyrus.” That’s the ancient title of the book. And by his own hand here looks like it’s a criticism but it’s actually a support to the Book of Abraham. The phrase by his own hand in ancient documents, particularly ancient Egyptian documents of the time of the Joseph Smith papyri is a designation for who the author is. There are three ways that they designated it, so it was made by, or by the hand of, or written by, and that’s how they designate the author. So, it’s the Book of Abraham written by his own hand means it’s Abraham’s autobiography. And that’s the way an ancient author would express it and how an Egyptian would express it.

But that's not how Joseph Smith expressed it and that's not how his followers in Kirtland and Nauvoo understood it. Joseph Smith claimed it was an original autograph, not a copy or a replica of the original but an actual autograph that had been entombed for some 3,500 years! Joseph Smith was on official record for stating that the mummies and papyri were that old!

Look, I've been through this time and time again and John Gee wants to hide the evidence and lie. Or is he really that stupid and uninformed. What an idiot! Dumb ass!

Shame on him! Gee wouldn't last 5 minutes with me in a discussion of the Book of Abraham. I would destroy his argument and wipe him out! He is like a little boy talking about ancient Egypt to a crowd of Mormon idiots who are buying his garbage.

Philo Sofee, are you there? You better be or I'm going to twist your arm!

John Gee is beginning to piss me off!

:evil:
User avatar
Everybody Wang Chung
God
Posts: 1660
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:52 am

Re: John Gee and the length of the Book of Abraham etc

Post by Everybody Wang Chung »

John Gee has publicly stated that his favorite movie is The Mummy starring Brendan Frasier. I find that deeply significant.
"I'm on paid sabbatical from BYU in exchange for my promise to use this time to finish two books."

Daniel C. Peterson, 2014
User avatar
Shulem
God
Posts: 7090
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:40 am
Location: Facsimile No. 3

Re: John Gee and the length of the Book of Abraham etc

Post by Shulem »

Everybody Wang Chung wrote:
Sat Feb 04, 2023 1:57 am
John Gee has publicly stated

John Gee is a coward and a piece of you-know-what! The man has no character. He's a liar and is playing a fool's game. He needs his sorry ass kicked!

See the area (length by width) below with the Egyptian characters written therein upon papyrus.

How many centimeters wide is the space? How long is the vertical length thereof? There are X amount of characters in X amount of space.

What does it say? Does it say what Joseph Smith said it said?

[ ] Yes
[x] No


Image
User avatar
Moksha
God
Posts: 5925
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 3:13 am
Location: Koloburbia

Re: Long Roll

Post by Moksha »

Shulem wrote:
Fri Feb 03, 2023 10:18 pm
John Gee 12:52 wrote:None of the fragments we have qualifies as being part of the long roll.

THAT IS A LIE. THE FRAGMENTS WE HAVE CAME FROM THE ROLLS POSSESSED BY JOSEPH SMITH!

Only in John Gee's warped imagination is there a long roll that has nothing to do with the existing fragments.
Smith making up the Book of Abraham from his own imagination fits very well with the evidence.
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
User avatar
Moksha
God
Posts: 5925
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 3:13 am
Location: Koloburbia

Re: John Gee and the length of the Book of Abraham etc

Post by Moksha »

Everybody Wang Chung wrote:
Sat Feb 04, 2023 1:57 am
John Gee has publicly stated that his favorite movie is The Mummy starring Brendan Frasier. I find that deeply significant.
Makes sense to me, Anck-Su-Namun was very hot!
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
User avatar
Everybody Wang Chung
God
Posts: 1660
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:52 am

Re: John Gee and the length of the Book of Abraham etc

Post by Everybody Wang Chung »

Image
"I'm on paid sabbatical from BYU in exchange for my promise to use this time to finish two books."

Daniel C. Peterson, 2014
Post Reply