John Dehlin’s Micro-Agressions

[Kishkumen]

FMH scientists search for John Dehlin’s micro-aggressions.

[Marcus]

aw come on kishkumen, can't you add a smile to your post? You're so much prettier when you smile!

[Kishkumen]

aw come on kishkumen, can't you add a smile to your post? You're so much prettier when you smile!

Aw shucks, Marcus. You’re such a flatterer.

[Marcus]

Microaggressions have more recently been defined as “brief and commonplace daily verbal, behavioral, and environmental indignities, whether intentional or unintentional, that communicate hostile, derogatory, or negative racial, gender, sexual-orientation, and religious slights and insults to the target person or group” (Sue et al., 2007, p. 5).

For example, it could be argued that the OP picture demonstrates a microagression, by implying that gender microaggressions can only be seen under a microscope. pretty heavy-handed, if so, but also...tone-deaf, anyone?

[Kishkumen]

For example, it could be argued that the OP picture demonstrates a microagression, by implying that gender microaggressions can only be seen under a microscope. pretty heavy-handed, if so, but also...tone-deaf, anyone?

Yes, I am sure it could be argued. Lots of things can. They may or may not have any merit, but they can be argued. You seem to do fine shoveling micro-aggressions at others, so apparently you have no problem with them.

[Marcus]

aw come on kishkumen, can't you add a smile to your post? You're so much prettier when you smile!

Aw shucks, Marcus. You’re such a flatterer.

aw shucks, Cutey-pie, do i have to pat your ass for you to get it? come on, do your part! you know what's expected of you. Get with the program, or get blacklisted. which i don't really mean, but yes, i really do mean. and don't think you can tell anyone about this and think anyone will believe you, because microaggressions aren't really a thing. As you well know!!!! Smile, honey.

[Marcus]

For example, it could be argued that the OP picture demonstrates a microagression, by implying that gender microaggressions can only be seen under a microscope. pretty heavy-handed, if so, but also...tone-deaf, anyone?

Yes, I am sure it could be argued. Lots of things can. They may or may not have any merit, but they can be argued. You seem to do fine shoveling micro-aggressions at others, so apparently you have no problem with them.

oh, so micro-aggressions ARE a thing. Well, we are at least making progress.

[Kishkumen]

aw shucks, Cutey-pie, do i have to pat your ass for you to get it? come on, do your part! you know what's expected of you. Get with the program, or get blacklisted. which i don't really mean, but yes, i really do mean. and don't think you can tell anyone about this and think anyone will believe you, because microaggressions aren't really a thing. As you well know!!!! Smile, honey.

Yeah, there you go! Way to show us all, Marcus! You have no problem with micro-aggressions! You engage in them all the time. But we knew that already. Without a microscope.

oh, so micro-aggressions ARE a thing. Well, we are at least making progress.

If they weren’t a thing, Marcus, there would be nothing to look for. Some people just look really, really hard, squinting so tightly that they can just make out what they want to see in the blur. Another thing you have modeled well for us here.

Thanks.

[drumdude]

Tell us how you really feel guys, jeez.

This John Dehlin nonsense is making a real mess of the forum which I’m sure was the whole point. IMHO it’s high time to send it down to the lower levels.

[Kishkumen]

Tell us how you really feel guys, jeez.

This John Dehlin nonsense is making a real mess of the forum which I’m sure was the whole point. IMHO it’s high time to send it down to the lower levels.

I know Marcus is tough, so I am sure everything will be fine.