Legal counsel may not be present for disciplinary trial

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
drumdude
God
Posts: 5213
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 5:29 am

Legal counsel may not be present for disciplinary trial

Post by drumdude »

https://www.reddit.com/r/exmormon/comme ... _the_mail/

What kind of a church tells this to a member who is facing (in their minds) the potential of losing everything in the afterlife - "sorry, you can't have representation."

Definitely sounds like a church headed by Jesus Christ to me. :lol: :roll:
Last edited by drumdude on Tue Mar 21, 2023 5:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
drumdude
God
Posts: 5213
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 5:29 am

Re: Legal council may not be present for disciplinary trial

Post by drumdude »

Compare with 2014's Kate Kelly letter - where she was invited to have witnesses and evidence shown during the "council."

https://ordainwomen.org/wp-content/uplo ... ter1-1.pdf
User avatar
Moksha
God
Posts: 5810
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 3:13 am
Location: Koloburbia

Re: Legal council may not be present for disciplinary trial

Post by Moksha »

The disciplinary trial is just a formality, the decision has already been made.
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
User avatar
Res Ipsa
God
Posts: 9568
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2020 6:44 pm
Location: Playing Rabbits

Re: Legal council may not be present for disciplinary trial

Post by Res Ipsa »

As an attorney, my professional expertise is in law. In the U.S., with a few, narrow exceptions, the First Amendment prevents the government from interfering in the internal processes of church governance, including decisions about who can be a member and who can not. Professionally, I would have nothing to add to an LDS disciplinary hearing. And that's what I would tell someone who approached me about representing them at such a hearing.
he/him
When I go to sea, don’t fear for me. Fear for the storm.

Jessica Best, Fear for the Storm. From The Strange Case of the Starship Iris.
drumdude
God
Posts: 5213
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 5:29 am

Re: Legal council may not be present for disciplinary trial

Post by drumdude »

Res Ipsa wrote:
Sun Mar 19, 2023 9:38 pm
As an attorney, my professional expertise is in law. In the U.S., with a few, narrow exceptions, the First Amendment prevents the government from interfering in the internal processes of church governance, including decisions about who can be a member and who can not. Professionally, I would have nothing to add to an LDS disciplinary hearing. And that's what I would tell someone who approached me about representing them at such a hearing.
As an attorney, would you expect the church to use boiler plate language in these letters rather than just make up random arbitrary rules for each one?
User avatar
Res Ipsa
God
Posts: 9568
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2020 6:44 pm
Location: Playing Rabbits

Re: Legal council may not be present for disciplinary trial

Post by Res Ipsa »

drumdude wrote:
Sun Mar 19, 2023 9:41 pm
Res Ipsa wrote:
Sun Mar 19, 2023 9:38 pm
As an attorney, my professional expertise is in law. In the U.S., with a few, narrow exceptions, the First Amendment prevents the government from interfering in the internal processes of church governance, including decisions about who can be a member and who can not. Professionally, I would have nothing to add to an LDS disciplinary hearing. And that's what I would tell someone who approached me about representing them at such a hearing.
As an attorney, would you expect the church to use boiler plate language in these letters rather than just make up random arbitrary rules for each one?
As an attorney, I have no expectations either way. Given my understanding of the process, which is that discipline is conducted at the local (stake?) level, with involvement from higher authorities ranging from zero to a bunch, I'd guess that both would occur, depending on individual circumstances.
he/him
When I go to sea, don’t fear for me. Fear for the storm.

Jessica Best, Fear for the Storm. From The Strange Case of the Starship Iris.
honorentheos
God
Posts: 3762
Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2020 2:15 am

Re: Legal council may not be present for disciplinary trial

Post by honorentheos »

The letter suggests the recipient has been forward and vocal about attempting to dissuade others from participating in the LDS church. I can't say I view the recipient having attempted to bring an attorney to the council and posting about it on Reddit favorably, either. It reads like a stunt.
drumdude
God
Posts: 5213
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 5:29 am

Re: Legal council may not be present for disciplinary trial

Post by drumdude »

Seems to have worked, it’s getting a lot of attention on Reddit.

If it is a stunt: fighting fire with fire, I suppose.
Failed Prophecy
Sunbeam
Posts: 75
Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2021 4:14 pm

Re: Legal council may not be present for disciplinary trial

Post by Failed Prophecy »

This is in the Phillipines, not the US. In countries where canon law has been present (i.e. majority Catholic countries) there may be an assumption that canon lawyers can/should be present to represent the parties. Obviously in the LDS context there's no such thing. But, if there is a cultural expectation for it, the language may just be saying don't bother with that.
User avatar
bill4long
2nd Counselor
Posts: 410
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2021 3:56 am

Re: Legal council may not be present for disciplinary trial

Post by bill4long »

drumdude wrote:
Sun Mar 19, 2023 5:18 pm
https://www.reddit.com/r/exmormon/comme ... _the_mail/

What kind of a church tells this to a member who is facing (in their minds) the potential of losing everything in the afterlife - "sorry, you can't have representation."

Definitely sounds like a church headed by Jesus Christ to me. :lol: :roll:
Here's the thing. It's not a criminal tribunal. It's not even a civil tribunal. There is no "right" to a lawyer. It's merely a squabble between members of a social club.

Beyond that, anyone at a D.T. probably doesn't really want to be a MormBot anymore anyway. So why even bother to show up to such a Kangaroo proceeding? Time to move on.
The views and opinions expressed by Bill4Long could be wrong and are subject to change at any time. Viewer discretion is advised.
Post Reply