RFM proves the First Presidency are federal criminals

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
User avatar
Dr Moore
Endowed Chair of Historical Innovation
Posts: 1820
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2020 2:16 pm
Location: Cassius University

RFM proves the First Presidency are federal criminals

Post by Dr Moore »

Another instant RFM classic, Red Handed!

Like past hits, such as Illegitimate First Presidency and the Miracle Making of President Nelson, RFM dismantles something complicated and takes the listener on a step by step journey through the evidence. In this case, a decades-long conspiracy, choreographed by the First Presidency, to commit federal criminal acts -- fraud -- in service of secrecy, a purely selfish and fear-based goal.

"Brazen," is my one word digest of the evidence explored in this 3+ hour podcast.

Unlike so many of the "messy" incidents in church history, this criminal conspiracy is recent and astonishingly well-documented. There are no "outs" for interpretation of facts or the law. Church devised a scheme and chose to break the law. Zero ifs ands or buts.

In summary: take an organization which is allergic to transparency (LDS church), put it in a place which demands transparency (the stock market), and what do you get? The answer: on the surface, you get circles within circles of cunning lip service to the law. Beneath the surface, simple fraud.

Stunning episode, RFM!

At one point in this episode, RFM reads the "warning" on the SEC forms at issue:
ATTENTION-- Intentional misstatements or omissions of facts constitute Federal Criminal Violations. See 18 U.S.C. 1001 and 15 U.S.C. 78ff(a).
Wow! Who in their right mind would mess with that? And yet, under FP approval, Ensign Peak made tens of thousands of intentional misstatements and omissions of facts on documents with that warning. For more than 2 decades.

Out of curiosity, I looked up 18 U.S.C. 1001. It reads:
18 U.S.C. 1001 wrote: (a)Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully—

(1)falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact;
(2)makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or
(3)makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry;


shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both. If the matter relates to an offense under chapter 109A, 109B, 110, or 117, or section 1591, then the term of imprisonment imposed under this section shall be not more than 8 years.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1001
If the church hadn't settled, people could have gone to jail.

Serious stuff, girls and boys. I have seen quite a few apologetics put forth to justify or absolve church leaders of any wrongdoing in this matter. Such as: it was like a speeding ticket, or, they got bad legal advice. Wrong, and wrong. The facts DO NOT support these apologetics, and it isn't close.

The evidence found during a 5 year investigation is damning as hell and shows a brazen conspiracy to break the law while giving pathetic lip service to the law.

So what? I was thinking about this today - what happens next? Well, on one hand, the material and context may be harder for many to appreciate than, say, Joseph's polygamy or institutional racism or the Book of Abraham. So maybe, at most, this issue is a slow burner. But the facts and evidence are just so completely at odds with notions of "complying with the law" as reiterated by the First Presidency so frequently. I think more people will begin to understand this issue, with all of its complexity and nuance, like a picking at festering scab. As more people do, more will realize the facts here are way, way worse than the church made them sound. I believe it will break a lot of shelves in the long run.
Last edited by Dr Moore on Tue May 02, 2023 1:45 am, edited 1 time in total.
drumdude
God
Posts: 5321
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 5:29 am

Re: RFM proves the FP are federal criminals

Post by drumdude »

I’m hoping this educates some Mormons who are still willfully ignorant about the issue.

It’s not rocket science, even though some certain apologists are trying to frame it as so complicated that no one can assign blame.
User avatar
Moksha
God
Posts: 5919
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 3:13 am
Location: Koloburbia

Re: RFM proves the FP are federal criminals

Post by Moksha »

Has Dr. Peterson attempted the apologetic mind trick: "These are not the Prophets, Seers, and Revelators you are looking for."
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
User avatar
Gadianton
God
Posts: 3916
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2020 11:56 pm
Location: Elsewhere

Re: RFM proves the First Presidency are federal criminals

Post by Gadianton »

After looking that over, I'll have to go back to SeN. Billy Shears was taking the whole lot of them to the woodshed over this, making them look like total fools. But I didn't have the basic explanation so I'll need to go back and find that thread.
consiglieri
Prophet
Posts: 842
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2020 3:48 am

Re: RFM proves the First Presidency are federal criminals

Post by consiglieri »

I am excited Professor Spencer Anderson could join me in our review of late-breaking research brought to us courtesy of The Widow’s Mite!
Post Reply