The canonical Christian gospels do not describe the Resurrection itself. I'd be surprised if any ancient non-canonical sources do, either, because even though I'm no expert on them, I think I'd have heard about something like that, and I haven't.
The gospels indeed agree that the empty tomb was found open. They all emphasise this. Anyway the implication is that Jesus could just have walked out normally after coming back to life. He wouldn't have had to teleport, in the canonical story.
A couple of the accounts (Luke and John) mention the linen strips that had wrapped Jesus's body being found in the tomb. In the story of Lazarus being raised from the dead, Lazarus is able to walk out of his tomb, but can use some help to unwrap himself. It's not clear how helplessly bound Lazarus was, or how tied-up Jesus would have been. So I think there may have been some notions that Jesus somehow just dissolved his way out of the wrappings, leaving them behind, but I think one can just as well imagine him unwrapping himself normally.
Otherwise the New Testament is ambiguous about how ordinarily physical Jesus's body was, post-Resurrection. On the one hand several passages emphasise that he could be touched, and that he could eat, and that he was not a ghost. On the other hand several passages describe him appearing and disappearing unexpectedly. They don't explicitly say that he just appeared out of nowhere, or vanished, but they have him suddenly being there in a room that was locked. And then Luke's Ascension accounts have Jesus "taken up" into heaven; in Acts, the disciples are left staring up into a cloud. So Jesus's exit is not a teleportation, but it is apparently a levitation.
My understanding is that later Christian controversies strengthened the mainstream Christian emphasis on Jesus's physical body, because it became a kind of political issue. The authoritative Church structure that emerged, and exerted version control on Christian doctrine, was based on chains of personal contact back to the Apostles who had personal contact with Jesus. Paul managed to wangle his way into the inner circle based on purely visionary contact, but the Church had to do all it could to suppress that precedent because anybody at all could make that kind of claim. So there was a lot emphasis on Jesus having been flesh and blood, even after the Resurrection. Those who had known him personally in the body were the sole sources of valid traditions about him; he was not a spirit who might continue appearing to anyone, starting up rival movements.
There was still Paul, plus the whole Logos and Trinity deal, which did kind of imply that Jesus might pop up again anywhere, anytime, anyhow, the Tao that runs through all things. This rather opposite tradition didn't completely die out.
The Secret Gospel of Thomas wrote:"I am the light that is over all. I am the All. The All came forth out of me. And to me the All has come.
Split a piece of wood — I am there. Lift the stone, and you will find me there.”
So we get Joseph Smith having his own Paul-like vision, all those centuries later.
Whether it's a coherent but hard-to-imagine concept like curved spacetime, or just nonsense, the Christian picture of Christ as normal human but God has been two-sided from the beginning. It isn't just Mormons who have looked more at the flesh-and-blood side, when they thought about their own resurrections, and avoided cremation. I doubt everyone thought that God would need to have their undisturbed bones in order to raise them to eternal life. There were acknowledged saints who had been burned, after all. The general feeling seems to have been, I think, that if being raised bodily was good enough for Jesus then Christians should follow suit, and leave a raisable body.