Internet Mormons, Chapel Mormons, Critics, Apologists, and Never-Mo's all welcome!
https://discussmormonism.com/
I fixed it. I was shocked when Rosebud accused someone of cyber-stalking since her picture is right next to the dictionary definition of a cyber-stalker.
I saw. I just posted a link. Interesting.Moksha wrote: ↑Thu Apr 18, 2024 10:05 pmI fixed it. I was shocked when Rosebud accused someone of cyber-stalking since her picture is right next to the dictionary definition of a cyber-stalker.
ByTW, the names Citizen Kane and Rosebud are interlinked with the classic Orson Wells movie Citizen Kane.
old post from a while ago referring to rosebud having citizen kane images. wrote: She's got that Citizen Kane thing on that website ... Facebook with the Citizen Kane for her cover
Perhaps someone has deliberately chosen that name purely to respond to rosebud. Or... I don't know.Wow! Thanks for acknowledging my good work with Mormon Stories! And how would you know if I have or haven’t created anything of note since?Doctor Steuss wrote: ↑Thu Apr 18, 2024 10:02 pmSo, when John cyber-harasses you, he refers to you as "Rosebud"?Rosebud wrote: ↑Thu Apr 18, 2024 8:52 pmAlso, I get that everyone knows my in-real-life name. I stick with “Rosebud” because I’m going to be sharing documentation that demonstrates John’s continued efforts to cyber-harass me by doing everything he could to ensure my in-real-life name was erased from association with the legitimate work I’ve done while simultaneously working to associate it with this scandal.
Also, it's you that's associating yourself with this scandal more than anyone else. Literally, no one else starts threads here drawing attention to your decision to violate your marriage vows and cheat on your husband, but you. Just like it was you that "doxed" yourself here, by posting your professional website, and later claiming it was others who "doxed" you.
Schrodinger's Rosebud. Hero and victim. Helplessly naïve, and brilliantly street smart. The ultimate mastermind behind Mormon Stories, and unable to create anything of note since.
Hi, it’s hard for me to know if you are trolling or not. I haven’t paid enough attention to the board.Imwashingmypirate wrote: ↑Thu Apr 18, 2024 10:25 pmold post from a while ago referring to rosebud having citizen kane images. wrote: She's got that Citizen Kane thing on that website ... Facebook with the Citizen Kane for her cover
What would you like John to do now to resolve this?Rosebud wrote: ↑Thu Apr 18, 2024 11:57 pmWow! Thanks for acknowledging my good work with Mormon Stories! And how would you know if I have or haven’t created anything of note since?Doctor Steuss wrote: ↑Thu Apr 18, 2024 10:02 pm
So, when John cyber-harasses you, he refers to you as "Rosebud"?
Also, it's you that's associating yourself with this scandal more than anyone else. Literally, no one else starts threads here drawing attention to your decision to violate your marriage vows and cheat on your husband, but you. Just like it was you that "doxed" yourself here, by posting your professional website, and later claiming it was others who "doxed" you.
Schrodinger's Rosebud. Hero and victim. Helplessly naïve, and brilliantly street smart. The ultimate mastermind behind Mormon Stories, and unable to create anything of note since.
If John had behaved ethically and was behaving ethically, I’d be long gone. What would be the point of me being here?
Anyway, thanks for acknowledging some of my good work and qualities aside your jabs. My hope is that you’ll never hear of my other amazing work.
The problems now are too big for a simple resolution. It’s not in my hands. Or, to be more specific, it wouldn’t be ethical for me to keep what is in my hands in them, so therefore, from my perspective, it’s not in my hands.drumdude wrote: ↑Fri Apr 19, 2024 12:04 amWhat would you like John to do now to resolve this?Rosebud wrote: ↑Thu Apr 18, 2024 11:57 pm
Wow! Thanks for acknowledging my good work with Mormon Stories! And how would you know if I have or haven’t created anything of note since?
If John had behaved ethically and was behaving ethically, I’d be long gone. What would be the point of me being here?
Anyway, thanks for acknowledging some of my good work and qualities aside your jabs. My hope is that you’ll never hear of my other amazing work.
From my perspective, John is living his life almost completely oblivious to what you’re doing. I haven’t seen any evidence that he is worrying about donors because of your handful of posts. He made a few vague references to you across maybe 3-5 podcasts over the last 10 years. And then RFM and the midnight Mormons did maybe 2-3 podcasts about you.Rosebud wrote: ↑Fri Apr 19, 2024 12:27 amThe problems now are too big for a simple resolution. It’s not in my hands. Or, to be more specific, it wouldn’t be ethical for me to keep what is in my hands in them, so therefore, from my perspective, it’s not in my hands.
John’s flair for media has created a circus. He has made many choices that got him here. He has been the one with the whip driving the elephants and the lions and the tigers through the rings of fire.
I like to think some good will come out of it, though. Here’s to hoping!
No. That's not how mega threads work.
Lol. That's not how megathreads work, either.I respectfully request that you not clutter the thread with aggressions, passive aggressions, or advice. You don’t have enough information to legitimately “help” me with anything and it all says much more about each of you than it does about me or what’s going on in the media and, now, the courtrooms.
Again, that's not how mega threads work here.But, I realize I can’t stop you either.
Still, this will only work if the crowd doesn’t mess up my thread with trolling and whatever emotions you personally feel about John or the church. They’re immaterial to what I’m doing and, if the crowd ruins this, I’m stuck going back to the old system...