from slogblog wrote:The Wicker Man
Space Time Is Doomed
Post Mon Dec 11, 2023 3:58 pm
Starting around 2010 this phrase has been embraced by more and more physicist. They further refine this phrase by saying that "space time is not fundamental". This simply means that this creation can cease to exist and yet a fundamental reality will continue.
I have been saying this same thing using different words since 1969. I have explained many times that while in science class in 1969 the Spirit gave me a mental model of how the universe works. Everything can be explained by this very simple model. And when something 'new' is discovered by science this model predicted it ahead of time. And more importantly the model never needs to be modified when science finds something new.
I won't get into all the details of how it works. I've done that already many times. But I will explain it all again if someone is interested.
This creation is an energetic system. A star is the best example of this. However, a star cannot be energetic or even exist without gravity. This means that gravity is the source of energy in the creation. But without the creation gravity has no purpose and indeed gravity only exist within the creation. This means that something within the creation besides matter is responsible for gravity. Science has called this something else "the Higgs Field". And the Higgs Field is weakening.
Something is seriously wrong with gravity, and nobody's quite sure why.
I am quite sure. I have been quite sure for the last 54 years!
But that's not enough for a group of physicists who have developed an alternative theory to explain gravity. Their theory involves decaying particles and the Higgs boson.
This is just another way of saying that the Higgs Field is weakening. Which is another way of saying that gravity is slowly becoming weaker. The model given to me in 1969 also predicts the weakening of gravity.
Gravity, strong and weak nuclear forces are all the same thing. Strong and weak nuclear forces is just gravity working at a nanometer scale. A radioactive isotope is radioactive because gravity is no longer strong enough to hold the isotope together.
2nd Peter
3:10 But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.
3:11 Seeing then that all these things shall be dissolved, what manner of persons ought ye to be in all holy conversation and godliness,
3:12 Looking for and hasting unto the coming of the day of God, wherein the heavens being on fire shall be dissolved, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat?
As a
physicist of a sort....
Some things I'd reply with, (I flushed my brain when I did my degree then became a mum so what physics knowledge I had is very deeply buried or it ran away somewhere so these are more just my feelings):
I don't recall space time being considered fundamental in the sense described here. I imagine space time to exist because of the continuous momentum of electromagnetic waves. I'm sure I probably studied the theories in either quantum physics or electromagnetism and I'm sure my thoughts probably aren't what we were taught lol. So how I imagine space time to work, it would only work because of the EM expansion. I don't feel that EM waves are affected by gravity in the same way that we are taught that matter is.
I'm guessing from the introduction of higgs, wickerman is interested in CERN.
My understanding is that the earth's magnetic field is weakening. This is due to pole shift and the poles are getting ready to flip. We can see by the earth's structure that the poles have flipped many times. I believe that in the Bible when it talks of the 3 days of darkness that this is warning of the pole flip. When the pole flips there will be a period of time where there is no protection around us and in this time of you are outside you will be killed. Whether that is because the core is moving or the tectonic plates are moving, I don't know. 3 days of darkness would imply the plates shift over the core and the core is continuing to spin on it's axis. But maybe the earth will spin the other way, which brings in the sun rising from the west prophesy in. I don't know. Just speculating.
I don't agree with the sentence; "A star is the best example of this. However, a star cannot be energetic or even exist without gravity. This means that gravity is the source of energy in the creation. "
A star can't exist without matter, would that mean that matter must be the source of energy? I don't believe gravity is the source of energy. I believe light is the source.
All through scripture, light is mentioned. In the beginning God created light. Christ is the light.
Gravity is being affected by the change in the earth's magnetic field. I do believe the eclipse will have an effect.
I do not believe, gravity, strong and weak forces are the same. I can see the logic in that they describe the experience of a sort of push or pull of you like. If they were the same thing then you'd be easily able to take the laws of one and apply them to the other. Gravity is far weaker than other forces mathematically. Gravity does not affect atoms and isotopes from my understanding. I also do not believe that any physical 'force' is responsible for this behaviour. The quantum world likes to be stable and will partner up and give and take to stabilise. And will do so with whatever is closest and makes most sense. It's like a dance of fields. Ultimately matter is fields and waves in my opinion. I can kind of imagine what is being said though. The big problem with the statement that radioactive isotopes exist because gravity can no longer hold isotopes together is very wrong again in my opinion(who knows the real truth but thinking logically). This would mean that gravity wasn't strong enough a long time ago, at least when radiation from isotopes were first discovered and it would also mean that the universe would just be made up of isotopes (although to be fair, we might not call them isotopes if they were the norm).
Edit: removing the ramble.
