Over at the comments section of SeN:
Clueless SeN commenter wrote:gemli, why don't you try saying something new, please?
Gemli wrote:Well, if the old stuff hasn't yet made my point, I'm not sure new stuff would do any better. Sigh...
DCP to Gemli wrote:You might be surprised at the way actual substance can affect a conversation.
How does that substance
affect the conversation at SeN?
Clueless SeN Commenter wrote:Bold of you to assume that evangelical atheists actually investigate claims that threaten their world view
DCP wrote:So true. Take poor gemli, for instance. But he's not entirely alone.
Amid all of the eye-rolling and guffawing that have ensued here and (mostly) elsewhere over my recent ruminations about the possible reality of "extraordinary knowing," not a single mocker or critic has, so far as I'm aware, so much as glanced in the direction of the books that I've cited.
Axelbeingcivil wrote:I'm not sure whether I fall into either category in your mind, but did I not go through one of the CIA research documents that was the topic of one of the chapters of these works and provide a link to the full document for the interest of others?
DCP wrote:You did. You're a much more serious-minded critic than Gemli is, or than the scorners on the Peterson Obsession Board are. I happily grant that.
God forbid DCP actually engage with criticism. He complains that critics aren't engaging, and when they do engage, this is the predictable result. Deny, minimize, bury, and go back to spewing snippets of spurious studies.