The Rosebud MEGATHREAD

[Moksha]

Why does being an ex-Mormon mean you don't trust a person named Faust?

Because of the pact made by Dr. Faustus? Sounds rather Midglean.

[Rosebud]

I don't think courts can be used as personal vengeance vehicles.

You aren’t really that naïve, are you?

Well, then…

If Moksha is really of that opinion, I amend my previous statement that read, “We all get how the civil system works,” to, “Those of us who don’t chose to live in naïvété get how the civil system works.”

[Rosebud]

The judge’s name is Faust so as an ex-Mormon, I don’t trust him.

Why does being an ex-Mormon mean you don't trust a person named Faust?

The judge in the case is closely related to James E. Faust:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_E._Faust

[Rosebud]

If anyone wants to check out how long the docket is and how many motions Open Stories Foundation donors have paid for John to file in order to scare people sh**less, it’s in Salt Lake County, 3rd District Court, Case #230900882.

Please keep in mind that this kind of aggression is nothing new for John. It’s just that his unwell behaviors are coming further and further to the surface making it easier and easier for people who don’t know him to see what he’s really like behind his Mr. Good Guy cloak.

[Marcus]

If anyone wants to check out how long the docket is and how many motions Open Stories Foundation donors have paid for John to file in order to scare people sh**less, it’s in Salt Lake County, 3rd District Court, Case #230900882.

Please keep in mind that this kind of aggression is nothing new for John. It’s just that his unwell behaviors are coming further and further to the surface making it easier and easier for people who don’t know him to see what he’s really like behind his Mr. Good Guy cloak.

Oh for “F”'s sake. Stop being a drama queen. If you have information state it. This parseling out of "clues" is ridiculous. Post the information you have about the case in question or don't.

[drumdude]

The documents on that Rosebud wiki are the same documents that I have already released.

You need to use past tense here. You removed them very shortly after posting.

But there are lots and lots more.

I don’t believe you, and since you are the one making up claims that never get substantiated I doubt many here believe you either.

James (since you brought him up), he didn’t get subpoenaed, but he has moved on to other things.

It’s very telling that your excuse doesn’t apply to James, who mysteriously stopped supporting you once he had thoroughly studied the documents for himself.

maybe you should pressure John to release all the documents

He doesn’t have the burden of proof. He isn’t making wild unsubstantiated claims.

It’s so lame (but so typical) to find a few out-of-context documents to try to make a woman look “crazy”…. or what was it that this PhD in psychology said back in the day. “Histrionic” was it?

You released the documents with context, and when it didn’t prove your case you quickly removed them. We all saw the context.

He should release everything.

You first.

[drumdude]

If you have information state it. This parseling out of "clues" is ridiculous. Post the information you have about the case in question or don't.

This.

[Markk]

I don't think courts can be used as personal vengeance vehicles.

I don't care about Rosebud, or John Dehlin, and have not really followed this....but come on...what world are you living in?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIAJl-wZElg

[msnobody]

You’re never going to let this end, are you?

[Markk]

You’re never going to let this end, are you?

????