Boylan's "sexual sin" hypocrisy?

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Tapir Rodeo
CTR B
Posts: 154
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2023 6:18 am

Boylan's "sexual sin" hypocrisy?

Post by Tapir Rodeo »

I stumbled upon this blog post that was linked by someone I follow on social media. Probably not a bombshell. But certainly interesting. It looks like Boylan fails to live up to his own standard and the standard of his church when it comes to lust/sexual sin.

https://mormonmyths1830.blogspot.com/20 ... eXRlcw&m=1
User avatar
IWMP
Pirate
Posts: 1989
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2021 1:46 pm

Re: Boylan's "sexual sin" hypocrisy?

Post by IWMP »

Oh my lord, it's like a what are those diaries called... Like a very gossipy, slagging off book.
drumdude
God
Posts: 8043
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 5:29 am

Re: Boylan's "sexual sin" hypocrisy?

Post by drumdude »

Wow. He pissed off someone enough to troll Boylan with a fake woman’s account… those screenshots are extremely embarrassing and cringe.

I want to laugh at this but it’s just sad. Boylan is clearly neurodivergent. It feels way below the belt to expose how his disability has affected his relationship (or lack thereof) with women.
Marcus
God
Posts: 8039
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:44 pm

Re: Boylan's "sexual sin" hypocrisy?

Post by Marcus »

drumdude wrote:
Sun Jun 16, 2024 2:02 pm
Wow. He pissed off someone enough to troll Boylan with a fake woman’s account… those screenshots are extremely embarrassing and cringe.

I want to laugh at this but it’s just sad. Boylan is clearly neurodivergent. It feels way below the belt to expose how his disability has affected his relationship (or lack thereof) with women.
Maybe someone could hint privately to him that when he dislikes people, calling one person's mother a 'ball of dung' and another person's wife a 'human cum stain' is not appropriate?
User avatar
IWMP
Pirate
Posts: 1989
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2021 1:46 pm

Re: Boylan's "sexual sin" hypocrisy?

Post by IWMP »

I wonder if everyone misses the point he is trying to make and feels like they are intruding into someone's deepest darkest thoughts.

Edit to clarify, "he" being the author of the blog.
Last edited by IWMP on Sun Jun 16, 2024 4:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Tapir Rodeo
CTR B
Posts: 154
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2023 6:18 am

Re: Boylan's "sexual sin" hypocrisy?

Post by Tapir Rodeo »

Marcus wrote:
Sun Jun 16, 2024 3:18 pm
Maybe someone could hint privately to him that when he dislikes people, calling one person's mother a 'ball of dung' and another person's wife a 'human cum stain' is not appropriate?
When his blog was removed by blogspot and then reinstated he removed a bunch of the more nasty posts. Then he just made more about different people. The guy is so off his rocker that losing access to what is, at this point, his life's work, proved to be inconsequential in deterring his unscrupulousness.

Boylan maintains close relationships with many Mopologists who present themselves as moderate and reasonable. As far as I can tell, they make no effort to moderate his impropriety, some seem to encourage it.
User avatar
Dr. Shades
Founder and Visionary
Posts: 3223
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2020 2:48 pm
Contact:

Re: Boylan's "sexual sin" hypocrisy?

Post by Dr. Shades »

IWMP wrote:
Sun Jun 16, 2024 3:53 pm
I wonder if everyone misses the point he is trying to make . . .
What point is he trying to make?
.
"When the Mormon God requires a PR crisis to act moral, we've clearly outgrown him."

--Everybody Wang Chung, 06-01-2026
User avatar
IWMP
Pirate
Posts: 1989
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2021 1:46 pm

Re: Boylan's "sexual sin" hypocrisy?

Post by IWMP »

Dr. Shades wrote:
Sun Jun 16, 2024 4:02 pm
IWMP wrote:
Sun Jun 16, 2024 3:53 pm
I wonder if everyone misses the point he is trying to make . . .
What point is he trying to make?
That boylan can't talk. (He's a hypocrite because he talks about others sinning when he appears to also be a sinner as per their definition of sexual sin).
drumdude
God
Posts: 8043
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 5:29 am

Re: Boylan's "sexual sin" hypocrisy?

Post by drumdude »

IWMP wrote:
Sun Jun 16, 2024 4:07 pm
Dr. Shades wrote:
Sun Jun 16, 2024 4:02 pm

What point is he trying to make?
That boylan can't talk. (He's a hypocrite because he talks about others sinning when he appears to also be a sinner as per their definition of sexual sin).
I think that was just a cover to embarrass Boylan. The hypocrisy is a side issue, this was about payback for Boylan’s years of smearing Christians online.
Tapir Rodeo
CTR B
Posts: 154
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2023 6:18 am

Re: Boylan's "sexual sin" hypocrisy?

Post by Tapir Rodeo »

drumdude wrote:
Sun Jun 16, 2024 2:02 pm
Wow. He pissed off someone enough to troll Boylan with a fake woman’s account… those screenshots are extremely embarrassing and cringe.

I want to laugh at this but it’s just sad. Boylan is clearly neurodivergent. It feels way below the belt to expose how his disability has affected his relationship (or lack thereof) with women.
I have no way to know if the woman is fake or not.

I also have no way to know if Boylan has any kind of disability, unless he has been open about a formal diagnosis? We can speculate but I don't know for sure.

What I do know for certain is that Boylan revels in exposing what he perceives to be the sexual sin of others (along with all his other nasty behaviors). This is just his chickens coming home to roost. The dude is guilty of the very thing he attacks others for.
Post Reply