Page 1 of 6
Boylan's "sexual sin" hypocrisy?
Posted: Sun Jun 16, 2024 8:10 am
by Tapir Rodeo
I stumbled upon this blog post that was linked by someone I follow on social media. Probably not a bombshell. But certainly interesting. It looks like Boylan fails to live up to his own standard and the standard of his church when it comes to lust/sexual sin.
https://mormonmyths1830.blogspot.com/20 ... eXRlcw&m=1
Re: Boylan's "sexual sin" hypocrisy?
Posted: Sun Jun 16, 2024 12:47 pm
by IWMP
Oh my lord, it's like a what are those diaries called... Like a very gossipy, slagging off book.
Re: Boylan's "sexual sin" hypocrisy?
Posted: Sun Jun 16, 2024 2:02 pm
by drumdude
Wow. He pissed off someone enough to troll Boylan with a fake woman’s account… those screenshots are extremely embarrassing and cringe.
I want to laugh at this but it’s just sad. Boylan is clearly neurodivergent. It feels way below the belt to expose how his disability has affected his relationship (or lack thereof) with women.
Re: Boylan's "sexual sin" hypocrisy?
Posted: Sun Jun 16, 2024 3:18 pm
by Marcus
drumdude wrote: ↑Sun Jun 16, 2024 2:02 pm
Wow. He pissed off someone enough to troll Boylan with a fake woman’s account… those screenshots are extremely embarrassing and cringe.
I want to laugh at this but it’s just sad. Boylan is clearly neurodivergent. It feels way below the belt to expose how his disability has affected his relationship (or lack thereof) with women.
Maybe someone could hint privately to him that when he dislikes people, calling one person's mother a 'ball of dung' and another person's wife a 'human cum stain' is not appropriate?
Re: Boylan's "sexual sin" hypocrisy?
Posted: Sun Jun 16, 2024 3:53 pm
by IWMP
I wonder if everyone misses the point he is trying to make and feels like they are intruding into someone's deepest darkest thoughts.
Edit to clarify, "he" being the author of the blog.
Re: Boylan's "sexual sin" hypocrisy?
Posted: Sun Jun 16, 2024 4:00 pm
by Tapir Rodeo
Marcus wrote: ↑Sun Jun 16, 2024 3:18 pm
Maybe someone could hint privately to him that when he dislikes people, calling one person's mother a 'ball of dung' and another person's wife a 'human cum stain' is not appropriate?
When his blog was removed by blogspot and then reinstated he removed a bunch of the more nasty posts. Then he just made more about different people. The guy is so off his rocker that losing access to what is, at this point, his life's work, proved to be inconsequential in deterring his unscrupulousness.
Boylan maintains close relationships with many Mopologists who present themselves as moderate and reasonable. As far as I can tell, they make no effort to moderate his impropriety, some seem to encourage it.
Re: Boylan's "sexual sin" hypocrisy?
Posted: Sun Jun 16, 2024 4:02 pm
by Dr. Shades
IWMP wrote: ↑Sun Jun 16, 2024 3:53 pm
I wonder if everyone misses the point he is trying to make . . .
What point is he trying to make?
Re: Boylan's "sexual sin" hypocrisy?
Posted: Sun Jun 16, 2024 4:07 pm
by IWMP
Dr. Shades wrote: ↑Sun Jun 16, 2024 4:02 pm
IWMP wrote: ↑Sun Jun 16, 2024 3:53 pm
I wonder if everyone misses the point he is trying to make . . .
What point is he trying to make?
That boylan can't talk. (He's a hypocrite because he talks about others sinning when he appears to also be a sinner as per their definition of sexual sin).
Re: Boylan's "sexual sin" hypocrisy?
Posted: Sun Jun 16, 2024 4:09 pm
by drumdude
IWMP wrote: ↑Sun Jun 16, 2024 4:07 pm
Dr. Shades wrote: ↑Sun Jun 16, 2024 4:02 pm
What point is he trying to make?
That boylan can't talk. (He's a hypocrite because he talks about others sinning when he appears to also be a sinner as per their definition of sexual sin).
I think that was just a cover to embarrass Boylan. The hypocrisy is a side issue, this was about payback for Boylan’s years of smearing Christians online.
Re: Boylan's "sexual sin" hypocrisy?
Posted: Sun Jun 16, 2024 4:15 pm
by Tapir Rodeo
drumdude wrote: ↑Sun Jun 16, 2024 2:02 pm
Wow. He pissed off someone enough to troll Boylan with a fake woman’s account… those screenshots are extremely embarrassing and cringe.
I want to laugh at this but it’s just sad. Boylan is clearly neurodivergent. It feels way below the belt to expose how his disability has affected his relationship (or lack thereof) with women.
I have no way to know if the woman is fake or not.
I also have no way to know if Boylan has any kind of disability, unless he has been open about a formal diagnosis? We can speculate but I don't know for sure.
What I do know for certain is that Boylan revels in exposing what he perceives to be the sexual sin of others (along with all his other nasty behaviors). This is just his chickens coming home to roost. The dude is guilty of the very thing he attacks others for.