I was speaking within the context of the LDS church’s ban on black people. If there was a ban on Pakistanis and not Indians, yes that would be as problematic as the ban became in Brazil.
In that context, the ban was on people of Black African descent, not simply black people. I actually don’t think Bishops got good guidance on how to manage the ban and identify people correctly, so they took your easy route of black skin = banned.
A quick browse of the wikipedia entry for Black people:
Almost all considered to be "black" are of relatively recent African ancestry. Of course we are all descendants of Africa on a long enough time-scale.
The main exceptions seem to be mixed-race people, such as in Brazil, and islander/Aboriginal peoples. I doubt there were enough Aboriginal people applying for temple recommends to constitute a significant problem.
Penis holders "feeling" like they are like vagina holders (whatever the hell that means, how could they know what a vagina-holder feels like?) is mental illness. And practically speaking, they are trans-vestites and most often mentally ill in other ways as well. Need to deal with the problem head on.
Most vagina holders don't want penis holders in their safe spaces, such as rest rooms and dressing rooms. Esp when minors are involved. This is a vagina holder rights issue.
The views and opinions expressed by Bill4Long could be wrong and are subject to change at any time. Viewer discretion is advised.
Penis holders "feeling" like they are like vagina holders (whatever the hell that means, how could they know what a vagina-holder feels like?) is mental illness. And practically speaking, they are trans-vestites and most often mentally ill in other ways as well. Need to deal with the problem head on.
Most vagina holders don't want penis holders in their safe spaces, such as rest rooms and dressing rooms. Esp when minors are involved. This is a vagina holder rights issue.
There are plenty of public spaces where bathrooms are not gendered, for example if you’ve ever taken a plane flight. Bathrooms are not an issue.
The church has enough money to convert the restrooms 100 times over with change leftover if they’re so concerned.
Penis holders "feeling" like they are like vagina holders (whatever the hell that means, how could they know what a vagina-holder feels like?) is mental illness. And practically speaking, they are trans-vestites and most often mentally ill in other ways as well. Need to deal with the problem head on.
Most vagina holders don't want penis holders in their safe spaces, such as rest rooms and dressing rooms. Esp when minors are involved. This is a vagina holder rights issue.
You express the LDS point of view as eloquently as the First Presidency or the Interpreter Foundation.
As they say, "Gotta hate on those LGBTQ infidels!"
Penis holders "feeling" like they are like vagina holders (whatever the hell that means, how could they know what a vagina-holder feels like?) is mental illness. And practically speaking, they are trans-vestites and most often mentally ill in other ways as well. Need to deal with the problem head on.
Most vagina holders don't want penis holders in their safe spaces, such as rest rooms and dressing rooms. Esp when minors are involved. This is a vagina holder rights issue.
You express the LDS point of view as eloquently as the First Presidency or the Interpreter Foundation.
As they say, "Gotta hate on those LGBTQ infidels!"
You're a weirdo. Blocked.
The views and opinions expressed by Bill4Long could be wrong and are subject to change at any time. Viewer discretion is advised.
