https://web.archive.org/web/20241204153 ... e/?journal
https://web.archive.org/web/20241204154 ... hings.html“DCP” wrote: Interpreter has published, and will have published, at least one journal article each and every Friday during the year 2024.
https://web.archive.org/web/20241204154 ... hings.html“DCP” wrote: Interpreter has published, and will have published, at least one journal article each and every Friday during the year 2024.
So, the Easter post was a reprint of not only an old talk, but also of a non-original blog entry. Tapir Dan the Plagiarizer strikes again.drumdude wrote: ↑Wed Dec 04, 2024 4:07 pmThe gaps are filled with the following non-articles:
November 22: two book reviews
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeters ... ormon.html
https://journal.interpreterfoundation.o ... storation/
https://journal.interpreterfoundation.o ... of-Mormon/
October 11: a hasty narrative blog post from DCP
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeters ... llage.html
https://journal.interpreterfoundation.o ... a-village/
September 20: another book review (DCP calls it a “piece”)
https://journal.interpreterfoundation.o ... y-looking/
July 12: another editorial:
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeters ... -keys.html
“A thoroughly vicious and rage-fueled new article has appeared in Interpreter: A Journal of Latter-day Saint Faith and Scholarship: “Who Holds the Keys?” written by Daniel C. Peterson”
https://journal.interpreterfoundation.o ... -the-keys/
March 29: A hasty Easter message:
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeters ... riday.html
“ The person who was slated to write the Interpreter Foundation’s Easter message this year suffered a family emergency and, in the end, was unable to complete the essay in time for publication. I was too embarrassed to ask anybody else to fill in at so late a date — when it became clear that the expected essay would not be arriving, we were at the absolutely last back-up worst-case deadline — so, being reminded by my wife of an Easter 2023 sacrament meeting talk that I had given (and that, quite uncharacteristically, I had written fully out), I slightly modified that talk (which, I was reminded just this morning, I had also posted on this blog soon after its delivery) and I submitted it to the journal as a rather desperate substitute. I had too little time, really, to have done anything else. I apologize, and I beg your charitable forgiveness.”
https://journal.interpreterfoundation.o ... -is-risen/
https://web.archive.org/web/20241204154 ... hings.html“DCP” wrote: As of last week, in addition to its blog entries and reprints and books and movies and radio broadcasts and conferences and the like, Interpreter has published at least one journal article on each of the past 645 consecutive Fridays.
Interpreter seems to categorize the postings into 3 groups: articles, essays, and reviews.Doctor Scratch wrote: ↑Wed Dec 04, 2024 5:58 pm**MYTH DISPELLED**!!! Well done, Drumdude! This is absolutely devastating! It seemingly happens every year: after I released the Top Ten list, something pops up that would have definitely made it on the list.... Well, this will have to wait until next year, I suppose, but we can officially call it:
Interpreter's Streak of Posting Articles HAS BEEN BROKEN!
And it would appear that this has been going on for quite some time. How far back did you explore the article posting calendar, Drumdude? Regardless, this is without a doubt the biggest explosion of a Mopologetic myth since we obtained definitive proof that Mopologists are paid. It's also a huge repudiation of the President's silly criticisms of Bond, as it shows that, all along, the President has had to engage in grotesque equivocation in order to cover up the fact that Interpreter isn't actually living up to his claims.
https://www.science.org/content/article ... -citationsWikipedia wrote:According to one study, 60% of articles published in predatory journals receive no citations over the five-year period following publication.
The President and his "junk journal" have provided countless hours of entertainment. Beyond that, it truly is a junk journal in every sense of the definition.drumdude wrote: ↑Wed Dec 04, 2024 7:26 pmCounting up the totals:
203 journal entries in Interpreter are reviews, or about 26%.
69 journal entries in Interpreter are essays, or about 10%.
500 journal entries in Interpreter are articles, or about 64%.
In other words, Interpreter can easily be seen as a "junk journal" in which almost half of the "articles" aren't even original research.
A study put a hard number on the lack of citations many of these "junk journals" receive:
https://www.science.org/content/article ... -citationsWikipedia wrote:According to one study, 60% of articles published in predatory journals receive no citations over the five-year period following publication.
In Interpreter's case, I think they would struggle to proffer a single example of one of Interpreter's articles being cited in another journal, much less have a citation rate as high as 40%.