Did L Tom write out that testimony for you to sign?Everybody Wang Chung wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2025 2:03 amIn all fairness, L. Tom Perry really did have a manuscript that would answer everyone’s questions. He showed it to me once shortly after the Swedish Rescue.I Have Questions wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2025 1:45 amIt was first published in April 2013, and then again in October 2017. It’s now 2025. Are they still in disarray? Where is this comprehensive and coordinated response to it that Peterson claims they would have produced had they had the time and focus?
Well, I actually saw it in a vision, with my spiritual eye. So, trust me, L. Tom Perry was speaking the truth and there really is a manuscript out there that answers every single question. I'm sure the Church will be releasing it soon.
The CES letter was popular because it was a PDF
- sock puppet
- Stake President
- Posts: 579
- Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2021 9:29 pm
Re: The CES letter was popular because it was a PDF
"Apologists try to shill an explanation to questioning members as though science and reason really explain and buttress their professed faith. It [sic] does not. ...faith is the antithesis of science and reason." Critic as quoted by Peterson, Daniel C. (2010) FARMS Review, Intro., v22:2,2.
- Physics Guy
- God
- Posts: 1836
- Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 7:40 am
- Location: on the battlefield of life
-
- God
- Posts: 6155
- Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:44 pm
Re: The CES letter was popular because it was a PDF
Of course! I will be happy to stop by then and sign my statement, witnessing that I heard you tell me your vision, a statement which I am sure you will write out for me first. Or you can just sign it for me, that works too.Everybody Wang Chung wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2025 11:39 pmWell Marcus, over the years I have given at least four very different accounts of my experience/vision. Why did I recount multiple versions of my vision? Why are there so many major differences between them? Do these major differences suggest that I fabricated the experience, or is there a more likely explanation? Let’s explore what the Mopologists have said about the many differences in my accounts.Marcus wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2025 9:49 pmDid your spiritual eye see it from a slight distance, only briefly, where it was lying flat on a table? And really, could your spiritual eye distinguish between a manuscript and a paper? Maybe it was an "article" which, as Peterson has clearly explained, could be absolutely anything as long as you saw it on a Friday.
First, it's very important to remember that the main elements of my vision are still incredibly consistent. For example, in all my different accounts I was there. Most important, Mopologists say that when stories are told over time and to different people in different circumstances, then there are bound to be some differences between them. In fact, Mopologists have told me that the major differences in my vision accounts actually help support that my vision did happen, because they show that I did not deliberately create a memorized version of the story to tell. Makes total sense.
So Marcus, please doubt your doubts. There really is a briefcase with all of the answers. It matters not that the briefcase is now in heaven guarded by angels with flaming swords. I hope to see you back in the pews next Sunday.
- Gadianton
- God
- Posts: 4979
- Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2020 11:56 pm
- Location: Elsewhere
Re: The CES letter was popular because it was a PDF
While that's all well and good, I'm not aware of Everybody Wang Chung having significant leverage over Marcus. I prefer to accept a signature when the signee's life could be turned upside down by the document preparer if they don't sign. I think Dan would agree with me on that.
Social distancing has likely already begun to flatten the curve...Continue to research good antivirals and vaccine candidates. Make everyone wear masks. -- J.D. Vance
- Boomer57
- Sunbeam
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2022 4:10 pm
Re: The CES letter was popular because it was a PDF
I have it on good authority that both Hales and Peterson will be recipients of the 2024 Red Herring Award....
' Give me truth and clarity, not fluff and charity'