Fairview residents fight back

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
I Have Questions
God
Posts: 4121
Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am

Fairview residents fight back

Post by I Have Questions »

"It is our opinion that the 5-2 vote … was not an approval of the application," Mark Johnson, the attorney representing the Fairview homeowners behind the lawsuit, told the Dallas Morning News on Monday. "It was a denial."

The dispute appears to hinge on zoning laws. Fairview laws and the Texas local government code require three-fourths of a governing body to approve a proposed zoning change if 20 percent of property owners within 200 feet of the change submit a protest. That means enough residents could "trigger a supermajority" vote from council members, Mayor John Hubbard told Chron. In Fairview, a supermajority means getting votes from six of seven council members.
It’s an interesting development. I’m guessing the residents are confident that 2 of the 7 council members are 100% against the temple.
Immediately after, Fairview Town Council members said that property owners of only about 18 percent of the land within 200 feet of the LDS Church temple's 8.2-acre site protested the permit application. However, Fairview United argued that they'd sent letters on April 28 protesting the permit application for a temple with a spire taller than 70 feet. The group said that property owners of 20 percent of the land protested, and the town miscalculated the count because it included the opinions of individuals who own land that's part of the nearby city of Allen. Considering only Fairview landowners, the suit argues, means that property owners of about 21 percent of the land protested the temple project—which means the council should've rejected the permit application, the suit says, per the Dallas Morning News.
I’m not sure if the legal statutes cover this, but it seems that the Fairview City Council shouldn’t be considering the land and protests of Allen City residents. Does this mean that the Allen City Council also needs to also give its approval?
Last edited by I Have Questions on Tue Jun 10, 2025 10:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
User avatar
Moksha
God
Posts: 8266
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 3:13 am
Location: Koloburbia

Re: Fairview residents fight back

Post by Moksha »

Trump would offer the Temple a pardon for the Church donating a new Supersonic Jet to him.
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
Marcus
God
Posts: 7984
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:44 pm

Re: Fairview residents fight back

Post by Marcus »

Rest in peace, Moksha.

A year later, Fairview's Mayor has offered an option:
Construction is underway on the controversial Fairview Texas Temple, but debate over the height of its steeple is far from over...

The original proposal called for a 174-foot steeple. The church later reduced the height to 120 feet before the town approved the project in April 2025.

...Hubbard said the controversy still follows him around town.

“A lot of people in the town feel like it’s been forced on them, this temple,” Hubbard said. “That it doesn’t fit and it really, really doesn’t fit.”

...For comparison, Fairview Town Hall stands five stories tall at about 65 feet, meaning the approved steeple would be nearly double its height.

In a new letter to leaders of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Hubbard asked the church to voluntarily reconsider the steeple height again, pointing to newer temples built with shorter or no steeples.

In the letter, Hubbard referenced the church’s Yorba Linda, California, temple, which features a steeple about 70 feet tall, and a planned temple in Vienna, Austria, that does not include a steeple.

Hubbard wrote that while the church has the legal right to move forward under the approved permit, a voluntary reduction could help heal lingering tensions in the community.

He said he worries the years-long fight over the project could leave a lasting divide in Fairview.

“Instead of being a symbol of hope and warmth or symbol of peace, it’s going to become a reminder of the forcefulness that was behind that,” Hubbard said.

With construction moving forward, Hubbard said he hopes one final request for compromise could help the town move on.

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has not responded to Hubbard’s latest request or NBC 5’s request for comment...
https://www.nbcdfw.com/news/local/fairv ... z2iy1gnz0c
[bolding added by me]
I Have Questions
God
Posts: 4121
Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am

Re: Fairview residents fight back

Post by I Have Questions »

The Mayor is right. It will be a constant reminder of the bully in their midst. The equivalent of a dictators in-your-face gold statue, silently gloating that they are big and you are small.
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
User avatar
MetaProf
Sunbeam
Posts: 42
Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2022 1:09 am

Re: Fairview residents fight back

Post by MetaProf »

It's not just a bully. It's rape. And they know it and won't apologize, because in the words of their dear leader "the church doesn't seek apologies and we don't give them"
User avatar
sock puppet
God
Posts: 1167
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2021 9:29 pm

Re: Fairview residents fight back

Post by sock puppet »

Does the temple and spire there make Jesus smile???
"There will come a time when the rich own all the media, and it will be impossible for the public to make an informed opinion." Albert Einstein, ~1949 "It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere." Voltaire
Post Reply