New Five Part Series on Polygamy

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
MG 2.0
God
Posts: 8272
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm

New Five Part Series on Polygamy

Post by MG 2.0 »

Hi all,
Faith Matters is doing a five part series on Mormon Polygamy. There may be some folks here interested in listening to it.

https://www.faithmatters.org/p/lets-unpack-polygamy

Enjoy!

Regards,
MG
drumdude
God
Posts: 8042
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 5:29 am

Re: New Five Part Series on Polygamy

Post by drumdude »

That's a lot of lipstick. If you wanna kiss that pig, MG, go for it.
MG 2.0
God
Posts: 8272
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm

Re: New Five Part Series on Polygamy

Post by MG 2.0 »

drumdude wrote:
Thu Nov 06, 2025 1:11 am
That's a lot of lipstick. If you wanna kiss that pig, MG, go for it.
It appears from your comment that you don't believe that 'more is better' when it comes to exploring some of these issues. Your mind is set.

For others this first installment in the series on plural marriage might be interesting in that the guest being interviewed by Patrick Mason is Laurel Thatcher Ulrich. Here is a short biography:
Laurel Thatcher Ulrich is a Pulitzer Prize-winning historian known for her extensive research on polygamy and its impact on early Mormon women. Her book, A House Full of Females: Plural Marriage and Women’s Rights in Early Mormonism, 1835–1870, offers a nuanced perspective on the subject, exploring the lives of women in polygamous relationships and their contributions to the LDS Church. Ulrich's work has been influential in understanding the complexities of gender relations and women's rights during the early 19th century.
One thing that becomes apparent very quickly as she is presenting her material is that she knows what she is talking about. She is an academic who has studied polygamy over many years. And not just Mormon polygamy. She is a scholar. At the very beginning she makes it clear that the historical lens does not always provide a sharp/clear view of what was actually going on, on the ground, so to speak.

I'm about half way through and am finding that she covers the bases and then some. I would encourage folks to listen to the series.

drumdude, I was saddened to read your rather cryptic and judgemental response. It sounds as if you've already made up your mind and that this particular issue is a pillar of your disbelief in the Restoration.

Regards,
MG
Chap
God
Posts: 3260
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 8:42 am
Location: On the imaginary axis

Re: New Five Part Series on Polygamy

Post by Chap »

MG 2.0 wrote:
Thu Nov 06, 2025 4:50 pm
It sounds as if you've already made up your mind
Yup. I'm already fully convinced that it is a bad thing for a society if rich and powerful men can accumulate large numbers of women, thus ensuring that:

1. Young men in that society are inevitably going to find it impossible to find a partner (e.g, the 'lost boys' effectively expelled from Warren Jeff's church).

2. The young women accumulated by the rich and powerful will in many cases lack the normal experience of a full-time loving partner to whose life they are central.
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
Mayan Elephant:
Not only have I denounced the Big Lie, I have denounced the Big lie big lie.
User avatar
sock puppet
God
Posts: 1184
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2021 9:29 pm

Re: New Five Part Series on Polygamy

Post by sock puppet »

Obviously polygamy is still a festering sore for the LDS--some 135 years after the manifesto--for them to dish up this 5-part apologetic for it.
"There will come a time when the rich own all the media, and it will be impossible for the public to make an informed opinion." Albert Einstein, ~1949 "It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere." Voltaire
I Have Questions
God
Posts: 4269
Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am

Re: New Five Part Series on Polygamy

Post by I Have Questions »

MG 2.0 wrote:
Thu Nov 06, 2025 12:15 am
Hi all,
Faith Matters is doing a five part series on Mormon Polygamy. There may be some folks here interested in listening to it.

https://www.faithmatters.org/p/lets-unpack-polygamy

Enjoy!

Regards,
MG
Does this cover the rationale for a 37 year old Joseph Smith marrying and having sex with a “mere girl” of 14 years old?
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
Marcus
God
Posts: 8039
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:44 pm

Re: New Five Part Series on Polygamy

Post by Marcus »

MG 2.0 wrote:
Thu Nov 06, 2025 4:50 pm
... you don't believe that 'more is better' when it comes to exploring some of these issues. Your mind is set...

...I was saddened to read your rather cryptic and judgemental response. It sounds as if you've already made up your mind and that this particular issue is a pillar of your disbelief...
Again, the troll trolls. The mental gymnast has said that more is not better, his mind is set, he's already made up his mind, particular issues are pillars of his belief, etc., etc., etc.. Every judgmental mindset he accuses others of is yet another projection from his own mind.
huckelberry
God
Posts: 4072
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 3:48 pm

Re: New Five Part Series on Polygamy

Post by huckelberry »

I Have Questions wrote:
Thu Nov 06, 2025 5:12 pm
MG 2.0 wrote:
Thu Nov 06, 2025 12:15 am
Hi all,
Faith Matters is doing a five part series on Mormon Polygamy. There may be some folks here interested in listening to it.

https://www.faithmatters.org/p/lets-unpack-polygamy

Enjoy!

Regards,
MG
Does this cover the rationale for a 37 year old Joseph Smith marrying and having sex with a “mere girl” of 14 years old?
So did Helen report that she had sex with Joseph Smith?
Marcus
God
Posts: 8039
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:44 pm

Re: New Five Part Series on Polygamy

Post by Marcus »

huckelberry wrote:
Thu Nov 06, 2025 5:58 pm
I Have Questions wrote:
Thu Nov 06, 2025 5:12 pm
Does this cover the rationale for a 37 year old Joseph Smith marrying and having sex with a “mere girl” of 14 years old?
So did Helen report that she had sex with Joseph Smith?
When a 37 year old marries a 14 year old, do you question the 14 year old about sex?
huckelberry
God
Posts: 4072
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 3:48 pm

Re: New Five Part Series on Polygamy

Post by huckelberry »

Marcus wrote:
Thu Nov 06, 2025 6:06 pm
huckelberry wrote:
Thu Nov 06, 2025 5:58 pm
So did Helen report that she had sex with Joseph Smith?
When a 37 year old marries a 14 year old, do you question the 14 year old about sex?
She lived many years past fourteen but it certainly is not usual to ask older women about that. Best I know Helen did not explain. She may have or may not have had sex with Joseph Smith.
Post Reply