I must admit my surprise that I beat the Proprietor to the punch, but I suppose he’s busy these days with more important projects, such as posting up a storm trying to rationalize his illicit love for the Beatles.It has taken longer than anyone first envisioned. And the reason for that is quite simple: there's no other website on the internet, that I'm aware of, that has the resources and the complexity we do.
My first impression of the new website: it’s overwhelmingly green.
Among other “new” content, the updated website includes a link to a reprint of Louis Midgley’s essay in the Daniel Peterson festschrift, “David Hume: On Human and Divine Things.” In it, Dr. Midgley confesses that he spent the morning of his first full day in the New Zealand Mission browsing in a secular bookstore. I am not making this up. He also confesses that he purchased a copy of Hume’s Essays: Moral, Political, and Literary in that same bookstore. (It’s unclear why then-Elder Midgley wasn’t proselytizing that morning.) In any case, Dr. Midgley writes:
After setting forth several examples of parallels between Hume’s writings and Madison’s essays, Dr. Midgley makes an intriguing claim:The first thing I discovered when I opened this then-sturdy little volume of 616 pages was that “Publius”—that is, James Madison—had been very deeply influenced by David Hume. I realized that Hume had set out much that Madison in particular later included in the Federalist Papers, the famous and truly remarkable letters to the editors of New York newspapers carefully explaining the contents of the proposed Constitution in the hope of New York’s ratifying it. For example, Madison’s famous Tenth Federalist lifted arguments from Hume about, for instance, the “mischiefs of faction.”
How Midgley determined that “no one had yet discovered that James Madison borrowed language and arguments from David Hume’s Essays” is left unexplained. Note that Dr. Midgley does not state that “no one had yet published an argument that Madison borrowed from Hume.” Rather, he insists that “no one had yet discovered” Madison’s borrowing. Even if he intended to say that no one had yet published such a claim, Dr. Midgley should have acknowledged Douglass Adair’s influential 1943 dissertation, wherein Adair drew attention to Madison’s use of Hume’s work. Dr. Midgley writes that “it was years later that Douglass Adair (1912–68), a very gifted historian at the College of William & Mary, became justly famous for essays in which he drew attention, among other things, to James Madison’s crucial dependence on David Hume’s Essays. Here Dr. Midgley cites Fame and the Founding Fathers: Essays by Douglass Adair (New York: Norton, for the Institute of Early American History and Culture at Williamsburg, 1974).What I did not realize then—and only discovered later, years after my first mission in New Zealand—is that no one had yet discovered that James Madison borrowed language and arguments from David Hume’s Essays that ended up constituting the core of Madison’s own crucial essays in the Federalist Papers.
Dr. Midgley notes that he spent his first week in New Zealand in Wellington, where he
I suppose it’s the lazy learners and lax disciples among the full-time missionaries who stick with the church-approved missionary teaching plan.actually engaged in what was then the recommended way of proselytizing that, much like most other missionaries, I soon refused to use. Latter-day Saint missionaries were then urged to use what was called the “Anderson Plan.” Along with other missionaries, I found it impossible to use. This had been fashioned by Richard L. Anderson, who later became a prominent professor at Brigham Young University and also a highly valued colleague and close friend. I never spoke of his “plan” with Richard.