Lessons from "El Mariachi" that the Mopologists Failed to Learn

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
User avatar
Doctor Scratch
B.H. Roberts Chair of Mopologetic Studies
Posts: 1747
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 7:24 pm
Location: Cassius University

Lessons from "El Mariachi" that the Mopologists Failed to Learn

Post by Doctor Scratch »

The laments concerning Bowdlerizing Brigham continue to issue forth at "SeN":
We’re trying to get the word out, and we hope that you’ll help us. We don’t have a big advertising budget for Becoming Brigham. Truth be told, we don’t even have a small advertising budget for the project. (We have no advertising budget at all.) What we’re relying upon, what we’re hoping for, is that people will watch the series and, we hope, like it, and that they will then share it with others. Will you join us?
First of all, who is the "we" here? Interpreter? Redbrick Filmworks? The vagueness is certainly interesting. (And deliberate, one assumes.) But you also have to wonder why--when the expressed goal here is to get as many people as possible to watch--there is "no advertising budget at all." Perhaps the thinking was that merely using the Interpreter President's connections would do the trick? Then again, it may be that the budget plan for the film was....shall we say, problematic?

Take the case of the classic, 1993 low-budget cinematic success story, El Mariachi directed by Robert Rodriguez. The film launched Rodriguez's career as a filmmaker and was wildly successful and yet it was produced on a shoestring budget: the entire production cost $7,225. Rodriguez accomplished this by using a number of cost-cutting measures--doing the editing in-camera, for example, or using locals as (unpaid) actors. Notably, Rodriguez drummed up nearly half of the budget by "participating in experimental clinical drug testing." Now, compare this to what we've learned about the funding of Bowdlerizing Brigham. The Afore has stated that he went on *six* 5-6 day-long trips, and that his expenses were covered by Redbrick Films. (Whether any of Redbrick's budget came via donations to Interpreter remains unknown, though it seems likely). So, we can assume 30-36 travel days, which might break down as follows:

--Airfare: $450 per flight x 6 trips = $2,700
--Lodging: 36 x $150 per night = $5,400
--Meals: 3 meals per day @ $15 per meal x 36 days = $1,600

All told, simply covering the Afore's expenses on this film comes to $9,720--well beyond what Rodriguez put up to produce a film that has become a cult classic. And as the Wikipedia entry relates, executives at Columbia Pictures liked the film so well that they eventually chipped in $200,000 to get the movie onto film, and then "millions more on marketing." Could it be that Rodriguez's gritty determination played a role in the movies ultimate success? It definitely seems that way.

So, what's the lesson for the Mopologists here? One takeaway here would seem to be a matter of priorities. If gaining the widest possible audience was the main goal, then why not tell the Afore to stay home and instead use that $10,000 on marketing? I mean, is the film really helped by scenes of him sitting around and musing about a conspiracy theory where BY plots to take out Joseph Smith? But there is also the matter of commitment and sacrifice. Robert Rodriguez was willing to put his own body at risk and undergo medical tests in order to generate money for the film. Where is a similar sacrifice from BB's producers? Sure: the Afore has stated that he gives money to Interpreter, but he has not clarified whether any of that money has been transferred over to Redbrick. Meanwhile, we've been led to believe that "running Interpreter" is somehow on a par with a senior mission, and yet, once again, the element of "sacrifice" seems to be missing. What if the Afore gave up some of his travel budget and diverted that money instead to a marketing fund for Bowdlerizing Brigham?

Well, as the saying goes, we all have to live with our choices. But the very clear lessons from El Mariachi are there for any nascent or wannabe filmmakers who are willing to listen.
"If, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
I Have Questions
God
Posts: 4269
Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am

Re: Lessons from "El Mariachi" that the Mopologists Failed to Learn

Post by I Have Questions »

It is interesting that, instead of giving the poor reception and universal apathy that Witnesses and 6DIA were met with, and that the Brigham Young character rehabilitation effort is now being met with (even the Afore's own home ward members have little to no interest in it), you'd think that he would at the very least give some consideration to what level of responsibility he might bear for their poor showing. That he might consider the subject matter which bombed so so badly at the box office might not merit a further investment of 80 more episodes. But no, the problem is that he needs more money and for members to stop being lazy. His lack of self awareness and lack of personal sacrifice is staggering.
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
drumdude
God
Posts: 8042
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 5:29 am

Re: Lessons from "El Mariachi" that the Mopologists Failed to Learn

Post by drumdude »

I Have Questions wrote:
Fri Feb 13, 2026 11:44 pm
lack of personal sacrifice is staggering.
He's definitely sacrificing what's left of his reputation. "Failed filmmaker" isn't a great coda to a lifetime of apologetic achievement.
User avatar
Gadianton
God
Posts: 6729
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2020 11:56 pm
Location: Elsewhere

Re: Lessons from "El Mariachi" that the Mopologists Failed to Learn

Post by Gadianton »

Doctor Scratch wrote:The Afore has stated that he went on *six* 5-6 day-long trips, and that his expenses were covered by Redbrick Films
Why do we even know that? I mean, anyone would wonder why someone would create a film with zero advertising budget or leave it as an afterthought. Who else went on those trips?
"if you can't admire Joe Biden as a person then it's probably, you got a problem." -- Lindsey Graham
User avatar
Everybody Wang Chung
God
Posts: 3819
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:52 am

Re: Lessons from "El Mariachi" that the Mopologists Failed to Learn

Post by Everybody Wang Chung »

The Afore has officially cemented his status as the Ed Wood of Mormon cinema, though that might be an insult to Ed Wood’s work ethic. The Afore has now managed to tank three straight projects. He's been dumbfounded and shocked about the lack of advertising budget on all three. To call him clueless is an understatement.
"I'm on paid sabbatical from BYU in exchange for my promise to use this time to finish two books."

Daniel C. Peterson, 2014
User avatar
Doctor Scratch
B.H. Roberts Chair of Mopologetic Studies
Posts: 1747
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 7:24 pm
Location: Cassius University

Re: Lessons from "El Mariachi" that the Mopologists Failed to Learn

Post by Doctor Scratch »

Gadianton wrote:
Sat Feb 14, 2026 1:14 am
Doctor Scratch wrote:The Afore has stated that he went on *six* 5-6 day-long trips, and that his expenses were covered by Redbrick Films
Why do we even know that? I mean, anyone would wonder why someone would create a film with zero advertising budget or leave it as an afterthought. Who else went on those trips?
If the goal all along was to get donors to pay for his hobbies, then this is a massive success. And I’m sure I’m not alone in noticing how this has all played out. When the criticism about him draining donor funds was first leveled, he blew up, but then went quiet. *Too* quiet, actually. And then we got a post about how he was in a budget meeting with Interpreter’s financial/accounting person. Only *then*—after all that—do we get the overly confident assurance that “no Interpreter money” was spent on his film-related travel. Well, of course, you can see how this looks. It looks like he knew he was guilty all along, but needed to check with the accountant person to ensure that no one would be able to prove it using publicly available documents.

But I think it’s fairly obvious that he’s been a “drain” on donor funds. He’s enjoyed airfare, lodging, and microwaved Pizza Hut at the expense of donors. This project has benefited *him*. There is simply no way that he can characterize it as a “sacrifice” in the same vein as El Mariachi.

Rodriguez’s film succeeded because of his willingness to sacrifice, and because he legitimately cared about the project. This, though? It’s about getting to travel and do Mopologetics for free.

The Afore has been remarkably dishonest when he claims that he is a “donor” to Interpreter. The truth is that he subscribes to the much more mercenary idea of, “Spend money to make money.” He publicly says that he makes donations to Interpreter in order to obscure that fact that he is getting thousands of dollars worth of free travel and food.
"If, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
Marcus
God
Posts: 8039
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:44 pm

Re: Lessons from "El Mariachi" that the Mopologists Failed to Learn

Post by Marcus »

Doctor Scratch wrote:
Sat Feb 14, 2026 3:06 am
Gadianton wrote:
Sat Feb 14, 2026 1:14 am
Why do we even know that? I mean, anyone would wonder why someone would create a film with zero advertising budget or leave it as an afterthought. Who else went on those trips?
If the goal all along was to get donors to pay for his hobbies, then this is a massive success. And I’m sure I’m not alone in noticing how this has all played out. When the criticism about him draining donor funds was first leveled, he blew up, but then went quiet. *Too* quiet, actually. And then we got a post about how he was in a budget meeting with Interpreter’s financial/accounting person. Only *then*—after all that—do we get the overly confident assurance that “no Interpreter money” was spent on his film-related travel. Well, of course, you can see how this looks. It looks like he knew he was guilty all along, but needed to check with the accountant person to ensure that no one would be able to prove it using publicly available documents.

But I think it’s fairly obvious that he’s been a “drain” on donor funds. He’s enjoyed airfare, lodging, and microwaved Pizza Hut at the expense of donors. This project has benefited *him*. There is simply no way that he can characterize it as a “sacrifice” in the same vein as El Mariachi.

Rodriguez’s film succeeded because of his willingness to sacrifice, and because he legitimately cared about the project. This, though? It’s about getting to travel and do Mopologetics for free.

The Afore has been remarkably dishonest when he claims that he is a “donor” to Interpreter. The truth is that he subscribes to the much more mercenary idea of, “Spend money to make money.” He publicly says that he makes donations to Interpreter in order to obscure that fact that he is getting thousands of dollars worth of free travel and food.
Is he arguing the Interpreter did not commission the filmmaker to make these films?? How can he possibly argue the Interpreter isn't ultimately paying for a project it commissioned?
User avatar
Doctor Scratch
B.H. Roberts Chair of Mopologetic Studies
Posts: 1747
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 7:24 pm
Location: Cassius University

Re: Lessons from "El Mariachi" that the Mopologists Failed to Learn

Post by Doctor Scratch »

He seems to be saying that Redbrick compensation is somehow different from Interpreter compensation. Whether or not Interpreter money has been transferred to Redbrick seems to be irrelevant, in his mind.

And in a sense it’s all dumb: his typical reader doesn’t care in the slightest if he’s profiting off Mopologetics. They’ll happily fork over their money so that he can shuffle through the snow in yet another crappy episode of Bowdlerizing Brigham.
"If, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
User avatar
Gadianton
God
Posts: 6729
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2020 11:56 pm
Location: Elsewhere

Re: Lessons from "El Mariachi" that the Mopologists Failed to Learn

Post by Gadianton »

There's definitely the possibility that a vendor will butter up a client on their own dime in hopes of future business.
"if you can't admire Joe Biden as a person then it's probably, you got a problem." -- Lindsey Graham
I Have Questions
God
Posts: 4269
Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am

Re: Lessons from "El Mariachi" that the Mopologists Failed to Learn

Post by I Have Questions »

Gadianton wrote:
Sun Feb 15, 2026 3:56 am
There's definitely the possibility that a vendor will butter up a client on their own dime in hopes of future business.
Do Redbrick Filmworks draw income from anywhere other than their chum at Interpreter who has access to millions of dollars that he throws their way?
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
Post Reply