sock puppet wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 9:38 pmIs that a trick question?![]()
It is the same "sock puppet" of 2010-2017 from mormondiscussions.com.
Well, if it is you then we shall know soon enough. No way you can hide under that sock.
sock puppet wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 9:38 pmIs that a trick question?![]()
It is the same "sock puppet" of 2010-2017 from mormondiscussions.com.
I finally got around to watching this last night. Has anybody transcribed precisely what Turley said on this? Because the way I heard it, he didn't shoot Mormonism in the foot--he shot it in the heart.Lem wrote: ↑Sat Mar 06, 2021 8:39 pmWow, talk about shooting your own religion in the foot. He could have said ‘Prophets know, but don’t tell,’ except that the prophet is photographed buying the documents, so the retrenchment to justify that is ‘Prophets aren’t allowed to know’??????Gadianton wrote: ↑Sat Mar 06, 2021 8:30 pmThey only skim the Church's response to the Salamander letter. I think there was a very brief scene with Oaks in it, reading some kind of response but I don't recall what it was. They do make the Church look a little silly. GBH bought up documents to suppress them while leaders made a flurry of contradictory statements about them. Turley jumps in to say that even the prophet isn't allowed to know the truth as it would impinge on free agency.
So, prophets who prophesy violate free will. But lds members must sustain their prophets as prophets. The cognitive dissonance must be head-exploding.