Epic Mormonism Live on Rosebud Accusations

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Lem
God
Posts: 2456
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 12:46 am

Re: Epic Mormonism Live on Rosebud Accusations

Post by Lem »

Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:
Fri Oct 01, 2021 7:43 pm
I think SV makes a fair point, as it relates to me personally, about Mormonism. I was ready to dip on the faith when I was a teen, but brainwashed myself back into a faithful narrative primarily due to social and familial obligations. I managed to stay in long enough to make a catastrophically bad decision to marry in the temple post-mission. I just didn’t have the internal courage to have and enforce boundaries until my mid-twenties, where I went inactive and then at 30 finally resign once I saw others were thinking and feeling what I was - shout out to recoveryfrommormonism.org.

Where I disagree with SV and align with Lemmie is Rosebud had a fairly sympathetic ear on this site until she decided to play games with regard to the claims she was making, to be wholly narcissistic, to ignore some excellent advice from people who were acting in good faith, and to determinedly destroy her personal and professional reputation by waging a Glenn Closian campaign against a dude over a fairly tepid affair. It was and is bonkers, and I don’t believe the board’s interactions with her had much to do with ex-Mormons being self-unaware and judgmental. The judgementalism was mostly post-facto our years-long interactions with her.

- Doc

edit: removed the ‘e’ from judgmentalism *tip o’ the cap to the qultist*
Yes, it's been a very, very long ride with Rosebud on this forum. When she doxxed herself here, I gave her my best professional opinion, ex-tbm woman to ex-tbm woman, and now that stuff is indexed (thank you Gadianton, Dr. Moore, mods, Shades, and all others!!!), I found the post.

Note the date on this comment, four and a half YEARS ago:
_Lemmie wrote:
Thu May 25, 2017 9:06 pm
Rosebud wrote:
http://[in real life link]
oh boy. Fell free to tell me to **** off, but, speaking as a woman with a BIC- tbm background who has gone through this process of extricating oneself from lds influences, may I say that going forward, you will want to have a professional footprint that can be taken seriously. It is nice, as candygal said, to get to know each other, but linking your in real life professional data with the type of posts you leave here does NOT help your professional image.
Rosebud wrote: ....there's something about me that makes me vulnerable. My vulnerability is my problem, but to some extent, it comes from Mormonism. I've started to sort that out...
Right. Since 2011, yes? Get it done. Sorry to be so abrupt, and I know it's not fair but you are not setting yourself up for a future where you are taken seriously as a professional woman if you continue to publicly wallow in this. I am totally sympathetic to the long period of time it takes to get over stuff like this, but think about your professional image and work on yourself in private, maybe in a therapist's office.
Rosebud wrote:I'm really pissed that all these transitioning Mormons, who I care about, run into John Dehlin first thing (and his female counterparts) and get sucked into a new set of problems that is a repeat of the trauma they're trying to escape. Over the last 5 years I've seen such positive development and a maturing of the post-Mo community. I'd like it to develop beyond its dependence on its charismatic leader.
Come on. Again, I know you won't like this unsympathetic stance, but as a grown woman how professionally do you think you will be treated if you continue, for years and in public, to lament over the "power" a "charismatic leader" has had over you during your adult years? Plenty of women, post-Mormon or not, find themselves enjoying a community with no need for a dependence on any sort of leader. That you define a community in terms like that is still that old Mormon way of thinking.
I've resigned all my positions. If I ever get back into any projects, it will be with one of the few solid, grounded leaders. They're harder to find because they're not screaming from mountaintops as often.
Or, radical idea, be your own solid, grounded leader. I understand the Mormon background in this process, but professionally, you just come across as never getting over the need to keep looking for a man to pull your life together for you. You're an adult. Pull your own life together!
Rosebud wrote:Maybe someone needs to put together a blueprint for not being deceived by the creeps in the transitioning Mormon landscape.
There are thousands. You don't need one just for Mormon transitioning because although it feels so unique to you, it's really not a unique problem at all. See a psychiatrist or therapist and discuss the various options you have for learning how to finish growing up.
Now I'm just frightened for new members of his communities....

The church creates a dependent people, disappoints them, then abandons them to these jerks and very few seem to safely navigate the weeds. I certainly didn't. But what can the church do to protect people from John Dehlin besides what they've already done?
Again, no offense, but we are talking about adults, right? Not helpless children. I empathize because I went through all of this myself, but honestly, you have to do the work yourself. No one is obligated to protect you from life.

I know I sound harsh, but it's still not a clear sailing path for professional women to be taken seriously. I went through my similar battle while attending graduate school in Manhattan. Talk about out of the frying pan into the fire. :rolleyes: You just have to grit your teeth and grow the hell up, as fast as you can, all the while behaving as professionally as possible.

And last, you have to present yourself in the best light you can. It's not fair, I know, but there are still plenty of people who will discriminate based on gender. You can't fix each one, or run out of the room crying every time, or vow revenge online in traceable posts or you will never get any work done. You just have to personally hold yourself to the highest standard you can, and then ignore the rest. Assume virtually no one in the professional world wants to hear you discuss your gender-related vulnerabilities, and just let them know you can do the job. Period. Whatever your gender.
I have posted different things here at different times to have a different affect on John Dehlin
Really? He still has that much power over you that you feel you need to demonstrate publicly that you have an effect on him?

Anyway, just consider this post my approach to how to have a professional life, as a woman, after growing up in what I consider to have been a cult-like environment. I'm not trying to tell you how I want you to be, as you mentioned in a recent post to me, it's just irritating to see a woman go on and on like this so I am sharing how the process worked for me.
User avatar
Doctor CamNC4Me
God
Posts: 9053
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 2:04 am

Re: Epic Mormonism Live on Rosebud Accusations

Post by Doctor CamNC4Me »

Thanks for digging that up, Lem. It juxtaposes nicely with the ‘sneering’ comment and gives context to the very long history Rosebud has with the board and a few posters in particular. If one of my kids had a penchant for touching a hot stove and then complained about getting burned after the third or fourth time of touching the stove, even after lengthy conversations about the adverse effects of touching hot stoves, I’d mostly likely let them know in no uncertain terms they’re a damn fool. Would that make me a bad parent or a bad person? Maybe, but the kid would still be a damn fool.

- Doc
Hugh Nibley claimed he bumped into Adolf Hitler, Albert Einstein, Winston Churchill, Gertrude Stein, and the Grand Duke Vladimir Romanoff. Dishonesty is baked into Mormonism.
User avatar
SaturdaysVoyeur
CTR A
Posts: 121
Joined: Fri May 14, 2021 7:24 am

Re: Epic Mormonism Live on Rosebud Accusations

Post by SaturdaysVoyeur »

Apparently I need to repeat once again that my "sneering mockery" comment was only in reference to the resurrection of this thread a few days/pages ago.

Rosebud hasn't come around. None of her proxies have come around. The only person to even mention her that I know of was when I made a post a week or so ago titled "A Light for Rosebud" that wound up having more to do with how our Mormon upbringings (beliefs around Eternal Companion, Law of Chastity, etc.) sets us up to believe we will never have to learn to cope with the pain of a romantic breakup.

If you're all as sick of Rosebud as you claim, then quit talking about her! Bringing her up just to rag on what a dumb bitch she is because she wrote a post that overused the word "fanciful" is cheap and dickish. It doesn't make any actual point. It's just mean for the sake of being mean.
Lem
God
Posts: 2456
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 12:46 am

Re: Epic Mormonism Live on Rosebud Accusations

Post by Lem »

SaturdaysVoyeur wrote:
Fri Oct 01, 2021 10:12 pm
Apparently I need to repeat once again that my "sneering mockery" comment was only in reference to the resurrection of this thread a few days/pages ago.

Rosebud hasn't come around. None of her proxies have come around. The only person to even mention her that I know of was when I made a post a week or so ago titled "A Light for Rosebud" that wound up having more to do with how our Mormon upbringings (beliefs around Eternal Companion, Law of Chastity, etc.) sets us up to believe we will never have to learn to cope with the pain of a romantic breakup.

If you're all as sick of Rosebud as you claim, then quit talking about her! Bringing her up just to rag on what a dumb bitch she is because she wrote a post that overused the word "fanciful" is cheap and dickish. It doesn't make any actual point. It's just mean for the sake of being mean.
I didn't quite get this so I went back and read the page. I think your beef is mostly with consig and not "you all."
consiglieri wrote:
Wed Sep 29, 2021 1:19 am
How…fanciful…
That's pretty mild for him, but typically I don't agree with his approach either.

Seriously, though, you post as though everyone here were exactly the same. It's getting really tiresome.
User avatar
Doctor CamNC4Me
God
Posts: 9053
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 2:04 am

Re: Epic Mormonism Live on Rosebud Accusations

Post by Doctor CamNC4Me »

SaturdaysVoyeur wrote:
Fri Oct 01, 2021 10:12 pm
Apparently I need to repeat once again that my "sneering mockery" comment was only in reference to the resurrection of this thread a few days/pages ago.

Rosebud hasn't come around. None of her proxies have come around. The only person to even mention her that I know of was when I made a post a week or so ago titled "A Light for Rosebud" that wound up having more to do with how our Mormon upbringings (beliefs around Eternal Companion, Law of Chastity, etc.) sets us up to believe we will never have to learn to cope with the pain of a romantic breakup.

If you're all as sick of Rosebud as you claim, then quit talking about her! Bringing her up just to rag on what a dumb bitch she is because she wrote a post that overused the word "fanciful" is cheap and dickish. It doesn't make any actual point. It's just mean for the sake of being mean.
1) “We” aren’t a hive mind, so you’d do better to address your grievances with a particular poster and what they said specifically.

2) You literally brought her up as a topic, linked to her website, and indulged in discussion surrounding her and her behavior and you have the audacity to complain about people here “bringing her up”? Therapist, counsel thyself.

- Doc
Hugh Nibley claimed he bumped into Adolf Hitler, Albert Einstein, Winston Churchill, Gertrude Stein, and the Grand Duke Vladimir Romanoff. Dishonesty is baked into Mormonism.
User avatar
SaturdaysVoyeur
CTR A
Posts: 121
Joined: Fri May 14, 2021 7:24 am

Re: Epic Mormonism Live on Rosebud Accusations

Post by SaturdaysVoyeur »

If you guys are tired of me already, then you tire too easily. I haven't even made it out of Sunbeams yet!

I responded to the overall tone of the thread. If you don't like that, you can lump it.

Yes, I did post about her recently. I even mentioned that. But I didn't post to rag on her, and the subsequent thread, if you take the time to read it, is mostly not about her.
drumdude
God
Posts: 5325
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 5:29 am

Re: Epic Mormonism Live on Rosebud Accusations

Post by drumdude »

SaturdaysVoyeur wrote:
Sat Oct 02, 2021 12:19 am
If you guys are tired of me already, then you tire too easily. I haven't even made it out of Sunbeams yet!
This thread is primarily about the topic of Rosebud's trainwreck, but I would love a dedicated thread on Patterson's trainwreck as well. Sounds like there's enough material on ex-Mo reddit for one, especially if he's still going strong like Rosebud is.
consiglieri
Prophet
Posts: 842
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2020 3:48 am

Re: Epic Mormonism Live on Rosebud Accusations

Post by consiglieri »

I would hope this is a place where people can express themselves freely without fear of retaliation.
Post Reply