Chapstick owns the apologists on the Liahona

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
User avatar
Gadianton
God
Posts: 3934
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2020 11:56 pm
Location: Elsewhere

Re: Chapstick owns the apologists on the Liahona

Post by Gadianton »

Sledge wrote:The reason the argument doesn't exist in those papers in the exact way you want is because to compare a torpedo (even a naval mine) with a compass is so absurd--so preposterous,
As the great Gemli asked of Mr. M one day, do they keep you locked in a tower behind an iron mask?

Given the torpedo example is a usual example from critics, and given every last drop of Late War 'scholarship' from apologists is a response to critics, then if it's so preposterous, for that very reason, the form-function argument would be the first objection on the list.

Dr. Cam and Physics Guy might continue to try to explain your misunderstanding, deliberate or not, but I predict they will make no progress.
Post Reply