The Witnesses Gets Its First Professional Review

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
User avatar
Everybody Wang Chung
God
Posts: 2637
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:52 am

The Witnesses Gets Its First Professional Review

Post by Everybody Wang Chung »

"I'm on paid sabbatical from BYU in exchange for my promise to use this time to finish two books."

Daniel C. Peterson, 2014
User avatar
Bought Yahoo
High Councilman
Posts: 523
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 8:59 pm

Re: The Witnesses Gets Its First Professional Review

Post by Bought Yahoo »

It isn't rotten. It is respectful.

But I have some comments:

1. The actor playing the young David Whitmer looked too ethnic for the role. (Italian or Jewish.)
2. The sound editing was poor. Too much rustling of starched clothing.
3. The video editing was mediocre. Almost approached the qualify of a seminary video.
4. The male characters were too groomed and clean shaven for the frontier.
5. The choice of topics too many and not well explained: Fanny Alger, Salt Sermon, Kirtland Bank etc and etc.
6. The acting was good; in particular the senior David Whitmer, the reporter, Joseph Smith and Martin Harris.
7. The cinematography was excellent for a film of this nature.

All in all I would say that this film was almost at the same quality of God's Army.
Doctor CamNC4Me
God
Posts: 9730
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 2:04 am

Re: The Witnesses Gets Its First Professional Review

Post by Doctor CamNC4Me »

Why do people keep referring to the transcription as a translation? Literally didn't happen within the given narrative. Taking the story at face value it was literally metaphysical forces causing words to appear on a rock. It was transcription, not translation.

- Doc
User avatar
Kishkumen
God
Posts: 9227
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:37 pm
Location: Cassius University
Contact:

Re: The Witnesses Gets Its First Professional Review

Post by Kishkumen »

Bought Yahoo wrote:
Fri Jun 25, 2021 5:52 pm
It isn't rotten. It is respectful.
Yeah, the review seems pretty respectful and fair to me. His criticism gets at a problem one would expect to weigh the film down--the obtrusive presence of the heroic Joseph Smith. I still say that the cinema's best Joseph Smith was played by Richard Moll in the 1977 film Brigham. Here is the rough-cut, frontier character I think Joseph Smith probably was, instead of the cherubic-faced catalog model with a nimbus-like glow we often see in these productions. Too bad! But, that said, this review tells me there is still something worth seeing here.
"I have learned with what evils tyranny infects a state. For it frustrates all the virtues, robs freedom of its lofty mood, and opens a school of fawning and terror, inasmuch as it leaves matters not to the wisdom of the laws, but to the angry whim of those who are in authority.”
Doctor CamNC4Me
God
Posts: 9730
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 2:04 am

Re: The Witnesses Gets Its First Professional Review

Post by Doctor CamNC4Me »

Bought Yahoo wrote:
Fri Jun 25, 2021 5:52 pm
1. The actor playing the young David Whitmer looked too ethnic for the role. (Italian or Jewish.)
That’s interesting. I thought they matched him as a young my wife:

Image

Image

Whitmer gots dat Roman nose, yo.

- Doc
Post Reply