And it's rotten:
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/witnes ... er-reviews
The Witnesses Gets Its First Professional Review
- Everybody Wang Chung
- God
- Posts: 2637
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:52 am
The Witnesses Gets Its First Professional Review
"I'm on paid sabbatical from BYU in exchange for my promise to use this time to finish two books."
Daniel C. Peterson, 2014
Daniel C. Peterson, 2014
- Bought Yahoo
- High Councilman
- Posts: 523
- Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 8:59 pm
Re: The Witnesses Gets Its First Professional Review
It isn't rotten. It is respectful.
But I have some comments:
1. The actor playing the young David Whitmer looked too ethnic for the role. (Italian or Jewish.)
2. The sound editing was poor. Too much rustling of starched clothing.
3. The video editing was mediocre. Almost approached the qualify of a seminary video.
4. The male characters were too groomed and clean shaven for the frontier.
5. The choice of topics too many and not well explained: Fanny Alger, Salt Sermon, Kirtland Bank etc and etc.
6. The acting was good; in particular the senior David Whitmer, the reporter, Joseph Smith and Martin Harris.
7. The cinematography was excellent for a film of this nature.
All in all I would say that this film was almost at the same quality of God's Army.
But I have some comments:
1. The actor playing the young David Whitmer looked too ethnic for the role. (Italian or Jewish.)
2. The sound editing was poor. Too much rustling of starched clothing.
3. The video editing was mediocre. Almost approached the qualify of a seminary video.
4. The male characters were too groomed and clean shaven for the frontier.
5. The choice of topics too many and not well explained: Fanny Alger, Salt Sermon, Kirtland Bank etc and etc.
6. The acting was good; in particular the senior David Whitmer, the reporter, Joseph Smith and Martin Harris.
7. The cinematography was excellent for a film of this nature.
All in all I would say that this film was almost at the same quality of God's Army.
-
- God
- Posts: 9730
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 2:04 am
Re: The Witnesses Gets Its First Professional Review
Why do people keep referring to the transcription as a translation? Literally didn't happen within the given narrative. Taking the story at face value it was literally metaphysical forces causing words to appear on a rock. It was transcription, not translation.Everybody Wang Chung wrote: ↑Fri Jun 25, 2021 5:20 pmAnd it's rotten:
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/witnes ... er-reviews
- Doc
- Kishkumen
- God
- Posts: 9227
- Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:37 pm
- Location: Cassius University
- Contact:
Re: The Witnesses Gets Its First Professional Review
Yeah, the review seems pretty respectful and fair to me. His criticism gets at a problem one would expect to weigh the film down--the obtrusive presence of the heroic Joseph Smith. I still say that the cinema's best Joseph Smith was played by Richard Moll in the 1977 film Brigham. Here is the rough-cut, frontier character I think Joseph Smith probably was, instead of the cherubic-faced catalog model with a nimbus-like glow we often see in these productions. Too bad! But, that said, this review tells me there is still something worth seeing here.
"I have learned with what evils tyranny infects a state. For it frustrates all the virtues, robs freedom of its lofty mood, and opens a school of fawning and terror, inasmuch as it leaves matters not to the wisdom of the laws, but to the angry whim of those who are in authority.”
-
- God
- Posts: 9730
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 2:04 am
Re: The Witnesses Gets Its First Professional Review
That’s interesting. I thought they matched him as a young my wife:Bought Yahoo wrote: ↑Fri Jun 25, 2021 5:52 pm1. The actor playing the young David Whitmer looked too ethnic for the role. (Italian or Jewish.)


Whitmer gots dat Roman nose, yo.
- Doc