The Witnesses Gets Its First Professional Review
Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2021 5:20 pm
Internet Mormons, Chapel Mormons, Critics, Apologists, and Never-Mo's all welcome!
https://discussmormonism.com/
Why do people keep referring to the transcription as a translation? Literally didn't happen within the given narrative. Taking the story at face value it was literally metaphysical forces causing words to appear on a rock. It was transcription, not translation.Everybody Wang Chung wrote: ↑Fri Jun 25, 2021 5:20 pmAnd it's rotten:
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/witnes ... er-reviews
Yeah, the review seems pretty respectful and fair to me. His criticism gets at a problem one would expect to weigh the film down--the obtrusive presence of the heroic Joseph Smith. I still say that the cinema's best Joseph Smith was played by Richard Moll in the 1977 film Brigham. Here is the rough-cut, frontier character I think Joseph Smith probably was, instead of the cherubic-faced catalog model with a nimbus-like glow we often see in these productions. Too bad! But, that said, this review tells me there is still something worth seeing here.
That’s interesting. I thought they matched him as a young my wife:Bought Yahoo wrote: ↑Fri Jun 25, 2021 5:52 pm1. The actor playing the young David Whitmer looked too ethnic for the role. (Italian or Jewish.)