Obama is naturally...

The Off-Topic forum for anything non-LDS related, such as sports or politics. Rated PG through PG-13.
_Tarski
_Emeritus
Posts: 3059
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 7:57 pm

Re: Obama is naturally...

Post by _Tarski »

subgenius wrote:
Brad Hudson wrote:
Oh, poor baby. Did I cast aspersions on your asparagus?

you poor little primate

whaddya got against primates? Isn't Elohim an indestructible primate?
when believers want to give their claims more weight, they dress these claims up in scientific terms. When believers want to belittle atheism or secular humanism, they call it a "religion". -Beastie

yesterday's Mormon doctrine is today's Mormon folklore.-Buffalo
_Tarski
_Emeritus
Posts: 3059
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 7:57 pm

Re: Obama is naturally...

Post by _Tarski »

subgenius wrote:corrupt or incompetent...consider:
Benghazi
IRS probes
AP News
Fast/Furious
Solyndra



Benghazi-----what is Obama guilty of? Do you have proof?

IRS probes----what is Obama guitly of? Do you have proof?

Fast/Furious-----what is Obama guilty of? Do you have proof?

Solyndra------ummm, when you invest in a company there is no guarantee that it will succeed. That's the American way. Romney invested in companies as well and more failed percent-wise than in the case of Obama's investments in energy companies.
So what law did Obama break here again?

Now shall we list the actual proven scandals, lies, incursions on liberty and general mayhem associated with any of the last several republican regimes?
I can't type for that long.
(you hypocrite)
when believers want to give their claims more weight, they dress these claims up in scientific terms. When believers want to belittle atheism or secular humanism, they call it a "religion". -Beastie

yesterday's Mormon doctrine is today's Mormon folklore.-Buffalo
_subgenius
_Emeritus
Posts: 13326
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 12:50 pm

Re: Obama is naturally...

Post by _subgenius »

Tarski wrote:

Benghazi-----what is Obama guilty of? Do you have proof?

IRS probes----what is Obama guitly of? Do you have proof?

Fast/Furious-----what is Obama guilty of? Do you have proof?

Solyndra------ummm, when you invest in a company there is no guarantee that it will succeed. That's the American way. Romney invested in companies as well and more failed percent-wise than in the case of Obama's investments in energy companies.
So what law did Obama break here again?

Now shall we list the actual proven scandals, lies, incursions on liberty and general mayhem associated with any of the last several republican regimes?
I can't type for that long.
(you hypocrite)


i never said i had proof of guilt or corruption, i thought i made it clear that i consider him to be incompetent....obviously you are leaning towards the incompetent side too...thanks for your support.
:wink:
Seek freedom and become captive of your desires...seek discipline and find your liberty
I can tell if a person is judgmental just by looking at them
what is chaos to the fly is normal to the spider - morticia addams
If you're not upsetting idiots, you might be an idiot. - Ted Nugent
_Tarski
_Emeritus
Posts: 3059
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 7:57 pm

Re: Obama is naturally...

Post by _Tarski »

subgenius wrote:
i never said i had proof of guilt or corruption,

You post was about corruption or incompetence.

You have proof of neither and your list was irrelevant unless you make a reasoned and factual direct connection to Obama.

So your post leaves us with the dilemma of how to characterize you; dishonest or of inferior intelligence. Of course, they aren't mutually exclusive.
when believers want to give their claims more weight, they dress these claims up in scientific terms. When believers want to belittle atheism or secular humanism, they call it a "religion". -Beastie

yesterday's Mormon doctrine is today's Mormon folklore.-Buffalo
_subgenius
_Emeritus
Posts: 13326
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 12:50 pm

Re: Obama is naturally...

Post by _subgenius »

Tarski wrote:
subgenius wrote:
i never said i had proof of guilt or corruption,

You post was about corruption or incompetence.

You have proof of neither and your list was irrelevant unless you make a reasoned and factual direct connection to Obama.

So your post leaves us with the dilemma of how to characterize you; dishonest or of inferior intelligence. Of course, they aren't mutually exclusive.

No dilemma with you however, you exemplify both with mastery.
I gave my support for the conclusions offered, it is not my burden to keep you informed of current affairs.
But glad to see that you are willing to absolve a President of knowledge and or responsibility for things that occur on his watch, by his appointees, and according to his policies.....yep, no dilemma with you at all.
Seek freedom and become captive of your desires...seek discipline and find your liberty
I can tell if a person is judgmental just by looking at them
what is chaos to the fly is normal to the spider - morticia addams
If you're not upsetting idiots, you might be an idiot. - Ted Nugent
Post Reply