ajax18 wrote:It never ceases to amaze me how the Democrats manage to play both sides of this coin. One claims there are no decent paying jobs available hence we need more welfare. The other claims that we need mass immigration because our aging population is insufficient to provide the labor force we need. So which is it, not enough workers or not enough jobs? I guess it's a question that is answered by politicians depending on which part of their constituency is asking.
Can you show where the Democratic party is advocating for mass immigration?
Can you show where the Democratic party is advocating for mass immigration?
Nancy Pelosi was pretty clear in saying that it would be immoral to build a wall in an attempt to enforce the border. Those to the left of Pelosi want to abolish ICE. I don't think it's controversial to say Democrats want more immigration than the law currently allows for and seek to thwart attempts to enforce the laws currently on the books.
And when the confederates saw Jackson standing fearless as a stone wall the army of Northern Virginia took courage and drove the federal army off their land.
Can you show where the Democratic party is advocating for mass immigration?
Nancy Pelosi was pretty clear in saying that it would be immoral to build a wall in an attempt to enforce the border. Those to the left of Pelosi want to abolish ICE. I don't think it's controversial to say Democrats want more immigration than the law currently allows for and seek to thwart attempts to enforce the laws currently on the books.
So no mass immigration. How about showing their positions from the Democratic party, but I suspect you have never investigated this as any well informed voter should.
Can you show where the Democratic party is advocating for mass immigration?
Nancy Pelosi was pretty clear in saying that it would be immoral to build a wall in an attempt to enforce the border. Those to the left of Pelosi want to abolish ICE. I don't think it's controversial to say Democrats want more immigration than the law currently allows for and seek to thwart attempts to enforce the laws currently on the books.
It could also be considered immoral to poke your child in the eye with a toothpick if she broke your house rules, but saying as much isn’t advocating for allowing your daughter to do whatever she wants.
So, you start a thread here that seems to condemn a politician for not being self involved, but condemn a politician here for being self-involved....its a bit confusing until the realization of how juvenile your political insights have become.
Seek freedom and become captive of your desires...seek discipline and find your liberty I can tell if a person is judgmental just by looking at them what is chaos to the fly is normal to the spider - morticia addams If you're not upsetting idiots, you might be an idiot. - Ted Nugent