From the second physical page of the document:
“Further, because no procedures or systems had been established to track separated families across HHS and DHS for later reunification, HHS struggled to identify separated children.”
Then, read the section that begins at listed page 15, strangely titled, “Key senior HHS officials failed to act on repeated warnings from staff; as a result, HHS did not plan for family separation”.
The OIG report that you are linking to says otherwise.
Strangely, your desperate attempt to blurt out, “But, but, Obammmmmmmaaaa!!1!” doesn’t change the fact that the Trump Administration had no viable plan.subgenius wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 2:29 pm(2) The "reunite" claim is also refuted by the facts -
whereas we learn via the Memorandum of Agreement (1st one signed by Obama in Feb 2016) that DHS and HHS had no clear system for communication between them, ergo the systematic errors/confusion began with Obama and not Trump, ergo Chap's claim that it "Truuummmpppfff!" is refuted.
Oops. Here’s where your usual mix of disingenuous editing and odd comprehension deficiency once again rise up to make you look foolish. Immediately after your quoted text block is the following:subgenius wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 2:29 pmReference also page 8 and 9 of referenced "report" linked herein and from cited article.
We can clearly "read" from the report -
"In June 2018, HHS and DHS did not routinely collect and share the information necessary to identify, track, or connect families separated by
DHS. Compliance with the Ms. L v. ICE court order of June 26, 2018, therefore required both HHS and DHS to undertake a significant new effort to rapidly identify children in ORR care who had been separated from their parents and reunify them."
So - arguably there may not have been a "plan to reunite", but that lack was from the Obama administration and not specific to Trump. The issue being discovered by the consequences of the above mentioned ruling.
WHAT WE DO KNOW AS FACT IS THAT JULY 2018 WAS WHEN THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION ISSUED Interagency Plan for Reunification Under Ms. L v. ICE - keyword = "PLAN". (see page 12).
“HHS coordinated closely with DHS and DOJ to develop a joint plan outlining the Agencies’ response to the court order in Ms. L v. ICE. The plan, dated July 18, 2018, describes processes to reunify Ms. L class members with their children.”
That would be the same court proceeding that I referred to previously, wherein the lawyer for the Trump Administration admitted that no plan to reunite families existed.
The ‘plan’ you are referring to here was created in response to that case. Therefore, Chap’s statement remains accurate. Your claims, on the other hand, do not. But, I do appreciate your brief moment of clarity when you end up agreeing with this conclusion (bolded above) in the midst of your foot-stomping.
Oh, I’m sorry. Someone should have taught you long ago that the excuse of, “Some other dude didn’t have a plan, so that means that Trump not having a plan actually means Trump had a plan!!1!” is not a valid display of logic. It is a bit amusing, though.Point being, Chap's claim (1) is refuted by fact; and claim (2) is refuted because Chap specifically states that the "reunite" issue was "propriety of the Trump administration's southern border policy" - when the facts show that it was Obama's policy with the shortcoming being from the Memorandum in Feb 2016.
OK. If you insist that my correct statements are the equivalence of arrogance in the face of your vapid utterances, distractions and continued episodes of falling flat on your face as you struggle to understand English, well, then, I’m arrogant. Better that, than to emulate your condition.your arrogance is only exceeded by your ignorance on the matter, which lags behind your desperation....but, yeah done here indeed.I appreciate that you tried so hard to make it look as if you weren’t just babbling out of your arse, but you’re done here.
And Chap’s statement still stands, as correct.