I find it quite amusing that you, of all individuals, choose to enter this thread today to share your profound insights with everyone, particularly given that you are the most prominent and vocal overseer I have ever encountered!
Prior to posting in this thread a few days ago, I took the time to read through the entire discussion, and it appears that Res Ipsa initiated this thread specifically for you and Jersey Girl. You, more than anyone else in this thread, are highlighting specific rules and detailing the exact numbers associated with them, along with reasons for their adherence.
Across the extensive board spanning hundreds of pages, you, more than anyone else, including Canpakes, are directing blame at various individuals, urging Shades to either ban them or confine their content to Spirit Prison.
A few weeks ago, I came across a thread where we were bothering a user named Leeuniverse to the point that he stopped posting for more than a year! You pressured the individual off the board, and it was a deliberate action on your part. You exhibit a harsh and spiteful nature, both in your role as Marcus and as Lem.
Cease attempting to manipulate the rules to benefit your progressive allies. You lack the intelligence to engage with me effectively. I recognize the kind of person you are, my experience in various women's psychiatric hospitals has equipped me to handle individuals who may be experiencing instability, meaning, I understand who you are.
You spent time in psychiatric hospitals? Was that recent? Bless your heart, that explains a lot.
Also, you need to stomp those tiny feet when you command someone to "Cease!"
As I mentioned, I find it amusing that you chose to come here today to back your progressive friend Canpakes after witnessing his struggle to effectively address my straightforward facts.
I must say, you truly are one of the funniest board nannies I've ever encountered! When I began reading this thread and encountered your post below, I nearly fell out of my chair from laughing so much. There's no way you can come on here and start discussing board rules. You are among the most significant violators of the rules to have ever posted on the board, and you seem to believe you can evade consequences due to being a woman, Lem.
Also, you need to stomp those tiny feet when you command someone to "Cease!"
It was very kind of you to not mention Hound’s tiny hands.
Hello, Canpakes, I noticed that Dr. Cam's image was left on the board overnight without any accompanying text. Does this imply that we can now post images without written content, or is this privilege exclusive to your progressive friends?
Also, you need to stomp those tiny feet when you command someone to "Cease!"
It was very kind of you to not mention Hound’s tiny hands.
Hello Canpakes, I notice that you're participating in the 4th of July thread initiated by Wang Chung. Since you, Canpakes the moderator, are engaging in a thread that lacks any context or written explanation in the opening post, does this imply that we are now permitted to share images without accompanying text? Is that privilege exclusively for your progressive friends?
It was very kind of you to not mention Hound’s tiny hands.
Hello Canpakes, I notice that you're participating in the 4th of July thread initiated by Wang Chung. Since you, Canpakes the moderator, are engaging in a thread that lacks any context or written explanation in the opening post, does this imply that we are now permitted to share images without accompanying text? Is that privilege exclusively for your progressive friends?
Have you used the report feature to report the post? Using the report feature alerts Shades and the mods to posts needing attention, as well as their whereabouts.
Hello Canpakes, I notice that you're participating in the 4th of July thread initiated by Wang Chung. Since you, Canpakes the moderator, are engaging in a thread that lacks any context or written explanation in the opening post, does this imply that we are now permitted to share images without accompanying text? Is that privilege exclusively for your progressive friends?
e
Have you used the report feature to report the post? Using the report feature alerts Shades and the mods to posts needing attention, as well as their whereabouts.
I am a bit lost, where is this rule against posting an image without text?
Hello, Canpakes, I noticed that Dr. Cam's image was left on the board overnight without any accompanying text. Does this imply that we can now post images without written content, or is this privilege exclusive to your progressive friends?
Have you used the report feature to report the post? Using the report feature alerts Shades and the mods to posts needing attention, as well as their whereabouts.
I am a bit lost, where is this rule against posting an image without text?
The context matters. In this case, an image posted by Hound once was a simple derail, so he appears to be using his misunderstanding of derails to claim that posting images is always bad. Or something like that.
Never believe that MAGAs are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since they believe in words. The MAGAs have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their questioners. They delight in acting as victims in one instance and bullies the next, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to frustrate and disconcert the opponent. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, or loftily shift the goalposts and pretend they scored a rhetorical point.
