The List

The Off-Topic forum for anything non-LDS related, such as sports or politics. Rated PG through PG-13.
Post Reply
Chap
God
Posts: 3277
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 8:42 am
Location: On the imaginary axis

Re: The List

Post by Chap »

canpakes wrote: ↑
Tue Sep 22, 2026 1:53 pm
Are you suggesting that loading a large, unfortified and highly-visible box - in the middle of a busy traffic circle and with easy vehicular access from multiple directions right up to its foundation, including by random passersby - with explosives and snipers is a bad idea from a security and safety standpoint?

But, yes … a number of military folks have spoken out about the apparent ludicrousness of this idea from that standpoint
An interested and non-hostile request - can you give us a link to members of the military speaking out on this aspect?

Certainly the veteran's group you cite are in the right about the interference of this huge presence with the atmosphere in Arlington National Cemetery.
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
Mayan Elephant:
Not only have I denounced the Big Lie, I have denounced the Big lie big lie.
User avatar
canpakes
God
Posts: 10673
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:25 am

Re: The List

Post by canpakes »

Chap wrote: ↑
Tue Sep 22, 2026 6:34 pm
canpakes wrote: ↑
Tue Sep 22, 2026 1:53 pm
Are you suggesting that loading a large, unfortified and highly-visible box - in the middle of a busy traffic circle and with easy vehicular access from multiple directions right up to its foundation, including by random passersby - with explosives and snipers is a bad idea from a security and safety standpoint?

But, yes … a number of military folks have spoken out about the apparent ludicrousness of this idea from that standpoint
An interested and non-hostile request - can you give us a link to members of the military speaking out on this aspect?

Certainly the veteran's group you cite are in the right about the interference of this huge presence with the atmosphere in Arlington National Cemetery.
Not a hostile request at all. And you can aim as many hostile requests as you want my way, anyway. : D

You’re absolutely right; I’ve used confusing language there. I tend to apply the term, ‘military folks’, to high-ranking retired individuals in media or consulting, typically those having achieved the rank of Colonel or General. But these people are all still retired (veterans). I use ‘veterans’ when describing the larger group of retired military officers of all ranks.

To be clear, I have not run across any dissenting opinions about Fort Trumpy Arch from active military personnel, and I wouldn’t expect to, given that public disagreement with Trump or Hegseth would have their thin-skin egos seeking retaliation, and given that military personnel are expected to publicly support the decisions of their commanders provided that those decisions are not leading to illegal actions.
User avatar
canpakes
God
Posts: 10673
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:25 am

Re: The List

Post by canpakes »

.
This probably won’t end well for us.
Pentagon Investigating How F-35 Fighter Jet Parts Bound for US Were Diverted to Hong Kong

Derricke Dennis
Sep 23, 2026, 9:28 AM EDT


Image

Lawmakers on Capitol Hill have launched an inquiry into reports that sensitive F-35 fighter jet technology was somehow sent to Hong Kong this summer in an unexplained mishap.

Politico was the first to report how the shipment of F-35 parts was bound for the United States for repairs but was rerouted over the Pacific Ocean from Australia. The incident has raised concern over the possibility that Hong Kong, a special administrative region of China which has become an increasing U.S. adversary, could have access to key components of the highly classified weapons system.

The report claims an intermediary was transporting the parts on behalf of manufacturer Lockheed Martin. It’s not clear why the equipment was rerouted to Hong Kong or who has possession of it now.

Military.com reached out to the Pentagon's F-35 Joint Program Office for further details of the diverted F-35 parts, asking specifically how it could happen and whether national security could be at risk by having sensitive military jet components in the hands of China.

"The F-35 Joint Program Office and Office of the Secretary of War are aware of a shipment issue of unserviceable F-35 Lightning II components," the office told Military.com. "We are actively working with U.S. authorities and industry partners to retrieve these components, investigate the incident, and place safeguards to avoid a future occurrence."

Lockheed said in a statement: "Our teams handle every shipment with the utmost diligence and safeguards to ensure the integrity of the F-35 program and the security of our allied partners.”

What Was in the Shipment?

The shipment reportedly included one of the jet’s cockpit canopies, which contains stealth technology that only the U.S. and its allies can access.

It's an acrylic bubble that tops the cockpit and is coated with a thin layer of transparent radar absorbent material that helps hide the plane from enemy radar.

The incident has led to a series of inquiries and briefings among congressional lawmakers and staff serving on key national security committees. Many are concerned an adversary could study the parts and potentially copy or reverse-engineer the technology for their own use.

Politico reported that U.S. State Department and Pentagon officials were first briefed staff in June, according to sources, and that additional briefings are expected in coming weeks.

The shipment’s unexpected diversion to Hong Kong would have brought it under Beijing’s command, which has in recent years kept a tight hold on Hong Kong. There are strict national security laws that allow Chinese authorities to influence Hong Kong’s political system and crack down on dissent.
User avatar
canpakes
God
Posts: 10673
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:25 am

Re: The List

Post by canpakes »

.
The Admimistration’s policies are not yet positively impacting housing affordability.

From the Wall Street Journal today:
Average 30-year mortgage rates hit 7.03% this week, the first time they have surpassed 7% since the beginning of last year, according to Freddie Mac. The threshold doesn’t hold any particular economic significance, but it is psychologically important for buyers. Economists say that with mortgages above 7%, more potential buyers are likely to stick to the sidelines, dragging down a housing market that is in its fourth year of stagnant sales.
User avatar
canpakes
God
Posts: 10673
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:25 am

Re: The List

Post by canpakes »

.
Sure it’s kind of high, but we’ve won this war, like, 67 times already.

Image
User avatar
Doctor CamNC4Me
God
Posts: 11117
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 2:04 am

Re: The List

Post by Doctor CamNC4Me »

Image

A MAGA insider shows himself to be a fan of Only Fans models.
Hiring a part-time news entertainment anchor as SecDef, what could go wrong?
Post Reply