Quasimodo wrote:
The percent of deaths by guns by population in England is 0.07%.
In the U.S. it's 2.97%.
That's because people in England don't carry guns.
The percent of deaths by guns by population in England is 0.07%.
The percent of gun deaths in America is 2.98%
Therefore, if people don't carry guns, the gun death rate will be lower.
Fallacy of
False Cause2. What do you mean "gun deaths by population." What does this mean? What is the time frame? What are the demographic and cultural variables?
3. There's a
massive problem with making the the less guns, less crime problem empirically, because no empirical evidence supports this claim. The states with the most well-armed citizenry (and laws that allow one to carry a concealed weapon), violent crime is substantially lower. The highest rates of gun crime are in the states and cities with the most restrictive gun laws.
Chicago has the most restrictive gun laws in the country. Less crime? Nope. Chicago's murder rate is 15.65 per 100,000. The average for the Midwest is 4.5 (5.6 for the state of Illinois). In 2012, the gun homicide rate rise by 15%, which was the highest ever in a single year. Washington D.C. has among the most severe gun laws in the nation, and a heavy gun homicide rate, historically.
Further, Israel and Switzerland, two countries with very high rates of gun ownership (including the large scale carrying of concealed weapons) both have gun murder and suicide rates well below that the U.S. despite comparable rates of ownership.