Xenophon wrote:Do you think that if these women were ugly (by your standards because you don't know how the [ guy] views this) that it would somehow change the "consent factor" from these boys?
Xenophon,
Attractiveness is not a "consent factor". Consent by definition is "permission for something to happen or agreement to do something." I say beautiful or attractive just to make it sound more emotional because in my view it is ridiculous that 20 year old girls get arrested for having consensual sex with 16 or 17 year olds. I explain why below.
EAllusion wrote:This is a load of nonsense. We can't tell if it's more or less consensual based on how pretty the teachers are.
Agree. I didn't say the contrary.
EAllusion wrote:I think a teacher-student relationship is inherently fraught with coercion and claiming a sexual relationship between a 24 year old teacher and a student near the statutory age of consent as consensual is consequently questionable
Coercion or manipulation is something else and should be punished with a least some prison. However, it is the male students that make the first move, not the teachers. Psychology Today article says, "vast majority of adult-child sexual liaisons are consensual. In some, the under-age girls are the initiators and pursuers. And sometimes the men wind up in prison". I think it is highly likely that male students are the initiators. Young men only care about sex, and it makes sense in evolutionary biology.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/al ... enough-sexEAllusion wrote: Again, I don't think those penalties need be 10-15 years in prison, but I also don't think it is a given that this should be an entirely civil matter.
But please remember that being in the sex offender list is like being in prison, especially if you don't have someone to help you. I can imagine being on sex offender list is like Hell on Earth.
The idea that 16 or 17 year olds can't consent to sex isn't back up by biological evidence, but I understand the law is the law in your state. It is funny states don't agree with each other on what the legal age of consent should be.
A University of Minnesota book Harmful to Minors (endorsed by pediatrician) argues "America’s attempts to protect children from sex are worse than ineffectual."
https://www.upress.umn.edu/book-divisio ... -to-minorsPlease note I haven't read the book.