Big Boobs, Blonde Hair and Blue Eyes and White Skin = Progressive Insanity

[ajax18]

Can't you see Hound? It's Nazi propaganda. We need to pass an affirmative action law that forces Sydney to gain 300lbs and wear black contact lenses so as not to unfairly expose her blue irises. This should level the playing field and make up for past and current discrimination against females with not so great jeans. Or perhaps just outlaw good looking healthy people from marrying and having children altogether. That's why Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is announcing as part of her platform that we phase out and outlaw all same race romantic relationships by 2030. That should get rid of those Nazi blue eyes for good.

[ajax18]

Beyond that, I’m inclined to shrug my shoulders and wonder what any of this has to do with marxism of all things.

Because it's not fair that Lizzo doesn't get the same attention as Sydney Sweeney. The only solution is more government regulation in advertising. For every Sydney Sweeney commercial, companies will now have to pay Lizzo ten times that because, unattractive fat girls need modeling contracts too. Why should they have to put in effort and use their mind to make a living when other people don't. It's just not fair and the federal government is responsible for making life fair, don't you see?

Personally I'm kind of repulsed by commercials that use scantilly clad women to sell a product, but it should be a free country.

[huckelberry]

Take a look at this picture to get a better understanding of how leftists genuinely feel about white people.

Okay, let's get this debate started. In other words, this picture illustrates the way in which a major news network that has been taken over by Marxist progressives genuinely feels about white people. So what they are trying to say is that if a corporation uses a white person in an advertisement, then that in some way indicates that there is a shift toward whiteness!

As I have been warning for quite some time, progressive Marxism is the death knell for the Democratic party. Individuals who have been indoctrinated by the progressive cult or those who are complete idiots would be the only ones who would truly believe that the presence of a white woman in an advertisement for a clothes store indicates that the culture is moving toward whiteness. Exactly what we are dealing with here is nothing short of insanity!

In light of the fact that American Eagle utilized a white woman in their advertising campaign, progressives are now urging people to boycott the company.

I actually followed up on this article. I thought it a bit much even silly. White women in advertising does not strike me as new. I might be old enough to think a bit less libidenous might be more appropriate but they are trying to sell jeans to folks younger than I am.

[Hound of Heaven]

Can't you see Hound? It's Nazi propaganda. We need to pass an affirmative action law that forces Sydney to gain 300lbs and wear black contact lenses so as not to unfairly expose her blue irises. This should level the playing field and make up for past and current discrimination against females with not so great jeans. Or perhaps just outlaw good looking healthy people from marrying and having children altogether. That's why Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is announcing as part of her platform that we phase out and outlaw all same race romantic relationships by 2030. That should get rid of those Nazi blue eyes for good.

Right now, Democratic strategists are gathering around a table or on a Zoom call, attempting to figure out why Democrats have lost the male vote, particularly among men aged 18 to 29. Let me assist the Democratic strategist since it is really simple to grasp.

When an American company decides to do an advertisement campaign featuring an attractive woman wearing blue jeans and showing off what the good Lord has given her physically, especially her boobs, don't double down when the insane progressives on the far left of your party start using words like Nazi, white supremacist, or fascist when describing a commercial that young men will undoubtedly enjoy watching!

Young men are fleeing the Democratic Party for a variety of reasons, the first of which is that Democrats and their woke DEI agenda are incredibly annoying! Men of all colors, nationalities, and backgrounds are leaving the Democrat party because woke Marxist progressives turn a simple jeans commercial into Nazi propaganda, which it is not. And the leftists want to cancel Sidney Sweeney because she consented to appear in the commercial! There's nothing more unappealing to males than a group of privileged blue-haired progressives screaming over an attractive woman wearing jeans in a commercial designed to increase sales for an American brand.

The progressive marxist agenda, which encourages their cult members to see the worst in all situations, is destroying the Democratic Party. Progressives have the ability to transform any setting intended to be pleasant or entertaining into a complete cluster fxxk, turning everyone off and making them want to distance themselves from the progressive narrative. So, yeah, the Democratic Party is losing men's votes because they have grown obnoxious, and people are sick of having to deal with their continual whining about topics that no one should worry about.

This American Eagle ad campaign demonstrates why men of all origins and races are quitting the Democratic Party. Men are incredibly easy to grasp. If there's a lovely woman in jeans with her boobs showing, we'll watch the commercial. And if a political movement, such as the Marxist Progressive Movement, begins to compare that commercial to Nazi propaganda, men will seek out other places to hang out, where they can enjoy being men without being nagged or told they are a major contributor to all of the world's problems.

Progressivism is a suicide dance, and we are all witnessing the end of DEI and the Marxist woke agenda.

[Kishkumen]

For my part, I agree that Sweeney does have some pretty good genes, but thinking that doesn’t imply that people with different skin color or body types don’t have good genes, too. Beyond that, I’m inclined to shrug my shoulders and wonder what any of this has to do with marxism of all things.

I agree that to most people cultural Marxism seems obscure, but it does exist and Nazis really hate it. I do not doubt that is something you and most other people don’t really spend a lot of time thinking about.

I will, say, however, that the SJWs who are allegedly "fulminating about this as some kind of Nazi ad campaign” must be an extremely small group and must be outnumbered by at least 100-to-1 by Hound of Heaven and his ilk.

Probably! My rule of thumb is that my ability to find articles on a topic in the first page of a Google search indicates it probably is not a topic that is lacking interest. I found articles about the furor over the ad, complete with social media quotations, with no trouble at all.

[Hound of Heaven]

https://youtu.be/eSeQ1a3pfXo?si=RLkjfNNOf3tYz3wf

This gal from the New York Post has a hilarious take on why the Marxist progressives are throwing a fit over the American Eagle commercial. In this video, she hilariously points out that the overly dramatic progressives are throwing a fit because this commercial shows that the American public has completely ditched the complicated progressive DEI narrative. Instead, they’re opting for a straightforward, joyful existence where they can feast their eyes on fit and attractive folks, rather than being pressured by the progressive crowd to gaze at less-than-stellar fat people in commercials all in the name of diversity, equity, and inclusion.

Imagine that! Beauty sales!

[Dr Exiled]

Seems like the republicans are taking out the tried and true communism label and calling it "cultural marxism" and then putting it on their opponents. From what I just read, cultural marxism was a critique on the ruling class in society using existing cultural norms as a mechanism of control, like the right does and like the left does as well. The group moving together against this or that at the behest of group leadership and and a violation of whatever direction the leaders want could and does risk excommunication. I would say that the conspiracy theory view of cultural marxism puts the original meaning on its head. It's really one team trying to push nonsense on the other team in order to get some sort of meaningless separation. Republicans love religious themes and their religion is continually under attack! (because of what their leaders do when they try to force values onto the rest). The left does the same thing with their woke, DEI stuff.

This is what AI said about cultural marxism:

"Cultural Marxism" is a term with two distinct meanings: an academic concept and a far-right conspiracy theory.

The academic concept of cultural Marxism refers to a branch of Western Marxism that applies Marxist analysis to culture and society, focusing on how cultural institutions and ideologies maintain power structures and social hierarchies.
Key figures and schools in this tradition include:

The Frankfurt School: A group of intellectuals including Theodor Adorno, Max Horkheimer, and Herbert Marcuse, who analyzed the "culture industry" and how mass-produced culture reinforces capitalist domination and undermines individuality.
They combined Marxist theory with psychoanalysis to critique modern culture.
Antonio Gramsci: An Italian Marxist philosopher who developed the theory of cultural hegemony, arguing that the ruling class maintains power not just through force but by shaping cultural norms and values to appear as "common sense," thus securing the consent of the governed.
He advocated for a "war of position" to gradually gain control of cultural institutions.
The Birmingham School (Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies): A group in the UK that further developed cultural studies, influenced by both the Frankfurt School and Gramsci, analyzing how culture is produced, interpreted, and received within specific socio-historical contexts.
This academic tradition critiques mass culture, media, and the ways ideology operates in everyday life, often focusing on the interplay between culture and capitalism.

However, the term "Cultural Marxism" is now more commonly associated with a far-right antisemitic conspiracy theory.
This conspiracy theory misrepresents the Frankfurt School and other Marxist thinkers as being responsible for modern progressive movements, identity politics, and political correctness.
It claims there is a deliberate, coordinated effort by intellectuals to subvert Western society, undermine traditional (often Christian) values, and replace them with progressive values through a "culture war".
This version of the theory originated in the United States in the 1990s and has since entered mainstream discourse.
It is considered a revival of the Nazi propaganda term "Cultural Bolshevism".
Critics argue that this conspiracy theory fundamentally misunderstands and distorts the original academic work, confusing the critique of cultural hegemony with the act of imposing it.

[canpakes]

Hound is certainly throwing himself into culture warrior mode here. He has stereotyped his perceived enemy and cast them in the required role so he can be a MAGA culture war hero in contrast with these "insane progressives."

Gotta give props to the ‘insane progressives’ who are choosing to call out blockheaded advertising campaigns alluding to genetics, as compared to their MAGA counterparts who are actively working to bury the records of child abusers and traffickers.

I note that the first person on this board to bring up the topic of this ad is Hound, and he will be the last person to talk about Epstein. MAGA priorities, yo.

[canpakes]

Republicans love religious themes and their religion is continually under attack! (because of what their leaders do when they try to force values onto the rest).

And it might not just be about forcing their values on to others, but also about forcing random body parts on to others.

Then there’s the folks who like to combine both into one hobby while trying to frame the other side for it, like this guy:

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/202 ... xual-abuse

[huckelberry]

Beyond that, I’m inclined to shrug my shoulders and wonder what any of this has to do with marxism of all things.

Because it's not fair that Lizzo doesn't get the same attention as Sydney Sweeney. The only solution is more government regulation in advertising. For every Sydney Sweeney commercial, companies will now have to pay Lizzo ten times that because, unattractive fat girls need modeling contracts too. Why should they have to put in effort and use their mind to make a living when other people don't. It's just not fair and the federal government is responsible for making life fair, don't you see?

Personally I'm kind of repulsed by commercials that use scantilly clad women to sell a product, but it should be a free country.

Ajax, is this silliness something you actually fear?

Fiddle, you know it is a joke not what anybody is interested in doing. Somebody may choose not to buy jeans advertised this way while others will choose these to buy. It is a free country, people can even write dumb complaints about the advertisements.