When there aren’t cameras around

The Off-Topic forum for anything non-LDS related, such as sports or politics. Rated PG through PG-13.
I Have Questions
God
Posts: 4193
Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am

Re: When there aren’t cameras around

Post by I Have Questions »

Res Ipsa wrote:
Fri Jan 30, 2026 2:59 am
Jersey Girl wrote:
Fri Jan 30, 2026 2:25 am
Thank you for replying. I learn so much from you. For example, this time I discovered that I apparently have no brain. :oops:
Naw, it was a good question. Lots of folks are asking if states can withhold tax payments to the federal government. I don’t think that works either because employers pay directly to the federal government.

in my opinion, the biggest hammers the people have are a general strike (not just for a day) and shutting DC down with 2-3 million protesters.
This.
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
Philo Sofee
God
Posts: 6020
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 1:18 am

Re: When there aren’t cameras around

Post by Philo Sofee »

Gunnar wrote:
Fri Jan 30, 2026 1:01 am
Res Ipsa wrote:
Thu Jan 29, 2026 2:57 am
In articles discussing the abuses perpetrated by ICE and CBP, I’ve seen several folks ask: “If they’re this bad when being recorded, what are they doing when there are no cameras?”

About what you’d expect.

The ACLU investigated conditions at Fort Bliss, one of the new pop up concentration camps for detainees. They sent a letter to ICE back in December. https://www.aclu.org/documents/ice-letter-re-fort-bliss The headliner:


Your tax dollars at work.

How about this:


Illegal and unconstitutional.

Well, how’s the food:


Maybe the weight loss is from exercise?


Well, I’ll bet the accommodations are nice…


These people are not the worst of the worst. They are detained in prisons and similarly secure facilities. These are your ordinary folks who came to escape persecution or seek a better life.

Done in your name with your tax dollars.
This is absolutely appalling! Isn't all this a blatant violation of the constitutional prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment? Such treatment of suspects and prisoners, no matter how reprehensible and guilty they are, is supposed to be prohibited by the Constitution, International law and the Geneva Convention, isn't it? Law enforcement personnel who are guilty of such abuse deserve to be indicted, prosecuted and sent to prison, just as surely as anyone else guilty of such cruelty!
this is why we left England under King George........
Post Reply